Friday, August 31, 2012

What is Virginia Green?

   
  • Virginia Green
    Virginia Green is Virginia’s program to encourage green practices throughout the state’s tourism industry!
    Sandy recycles at the Virginia Aquarium!Sandy recycles at the Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center.

    Recycling, Waste Reduction, Energy and Water Conservation

    All Virginia Green participants must have programs in place which address these environmental impacts.

    Self-Certification

    Virginia Green participants have “self-certified” that they are practicing the required green activities for their type of business.

    Recognition

    All Virginia Green participants are identified by the Virginia Green logo.

    Consumers Play a Major Role!

    Virginia Green asks environmentally-responsible customers to check on the participants and give constructive feedback

    Virginia Green is run in partnership between
    Virginia is for LoversDepartment of Environmental QualityVirginia Hospitality and Travel Association
  • Facility Operators: Do You Want to Join Virginia Green? Go to the Virginia Green program website at the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to learn more!
  •  
    TRAVEL GREEN! If you are looking to travel in Virginia, look for the Virginia Green logo!

Thursday, August 30, 2012

WORKSHOP: Local and Site-Specific Impacts -- Uranium Mining and Milling at Coles Hill



PLEASE JOIN US FOR A WORKSHOP

Presenter:  Val Green, mining /wastewater engineer

Topic: Local and Site-Specific Impacts -- Uranium Mining and Milling at Coles Hill

Date:  Thursday, September 13, 2012 from 7 to 9 p.m.

Location:  Olde Dominion Agricultural Foundation
19783 US Highway 29 South, Chatham, VA 24531

Sponsor:  Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League (www.bred.org)
Contact:  Ann Rogers, Community Organizer, BREDL 
540-312-3104 or amelvin3@verizon.net

This workshop will take a hard look at site-specific factors at the proposed uranium mine and mill site at Coles Hill in Pittsylvania County, and how those factors might be predicted to impact the environment and health of the communities surrounding the proposed mine site.  We will look at:

 1. Predictors of acid rock drainage – does Coles Hill bear the earmarks?
 2. Nature of the material that may seep from Coles Hill mill tailings containment, and what will need to be done to keep it out of the groundwater. 
3. Nature of how the Pittsylvania County wind patterns will affect distribution of radioactive dust during the active mining phase. 
4. Whether Coles Hill soil/ rock structures will affect the risk of releases from mill tailings containment at Coles Hill.
5. Whether the need to divert surface water from the mining area may result in the massive reconstruction of a FEMA Class A Flood Zone.
 6. Much more, plus Question & Answer period.

Mr. Green has served as expert witness for a dozen groups seeking to stop mines, including Friends of Santa Fe, Lloyds of London, and Ted Turner Ranches.

He taught mining engineering at New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology in Socorro, NM from 1989 to 1994.  Teaching and research topics while employed as Assistant Professor included:  environmental management for mining wastes; hydrologic analysis and design; mine waste facility design; mining waste disposal; and basic civil engineering.  He has performed evaluation and review of Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements, and permit applications for mining operations.  In positions within the governmental, non-profit, and for-profit sectors, he has had extensive experience working in compliance and enforcement of National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Air Act, and Clean Water Act.

He served as New Mexico's Mining Commissioner from 1993 to 1995.

From 1991 to 1999 he worked in mine waste management through work with the Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service; New Mexico Mining and Minerals Division; the Pueblo of Sandia; and non-profit and for-profit entities. He also provided technical assistance with the formulation and writing of the New Mexico Mining Regulations., and served as a member of the N.M. Mining Commission. From 1978-89, working as an environmental engineer for the South Carolina Land Resources Commission, Division of Mining & Reclamation, he provided review and oversight of projects involving aquifer containment and remediation for mine site dewatering; surface and subsurface containment from mine process wastes; and mining regulatory permitting procedures.

Mr. Green is a graduate of Clemson University with a BS in Civil Engineering, and holds an MS in Environmental Engineering from University of Texas.  He currently works in the nonprofit sector helping rural communities develop and protect potable water, wastewater, and solid waste systems.  He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.

Announcement of Val Green's workshop.doc:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=1392fb6ce3d70198&mt=application/msword&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D1392fb6ce3d70198%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbTIw_NxVyePnEOiBOQaOBNQM2Ccaw

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Company seeking to mine uranium in Virginia says water supplies not at risk; skeptic wonders



STEVE SZKOTAK Associated Press
August 28, 2012 - 6:51 pm EDT


RICHMOND, Va. — The company proposing to mine the nation's largest known uranium deposit assured Virginia Beach residents Tuesday their public water supplies would not be threatened by the processing of the radioactive ore.

Virginia Uranium Inc. restated its commitment to store radioactive-laced rock from the so-called Coles Hill deposit in below-ground containment cells, which it said would "eliminate the risk" of tailings entering public water supplies.

A Virginia Beach study has warned that a catastrophic weather event at a Pittsylvania County milling facility could scatter waste known as tailings into Lake Gaston, which supplies water to the resort city and neighboring communities about 100 miles away. The study's conclusions were based on above-ground containment cells.

"By announcing our company's firm commitment to store all tailings below ground,
Patrick Wales, Virginia Uranium's project manager, said in a statement.


Robert G. Burnley, a former director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality who opposes uranium mining, said regulators would decide how the tailings would be stored, not Virginia Uranium.




"For Patrick Wales to stand up and say 'If we could get a permit, this is what is going to be required' is just laughable," Burnley said. "My response is: poppycock."



"It just can't be done safely in this part of the world," said Burnley, who advises the Southern Environmental Law Center on uranium mining issues. "It's nobody's fault. It's just the way it is."



The processing, or milling, of the ore has been the primary concern of opponents. They fear huge amounts of uranium-tainted rock and chemicals used to separate the radioactive ore from the rock could escape containment cells during a storm of historic proportions.

A Virginia Beach study concluded that could occur and it would take two months to two years to completely flush radioactive containments out of Lake Gaston.

Virginia Beach city engineer Tim Leahy said other mining tailing accidents have occurred, despite industry's assurances, and they often involve water.

"These failures have occurred in the past and they can occur in the future," Leahy said in an interview earlier this year with The Associated Press. "We do assume the most likely event would coincide with a very, very heavy storm because when you look around the world, historically, water is often involved."

http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/47f56fe8345a4cc19ca9cb34b37cf215/VA--Uranium-Mining



Info about U mining in VA



Optimism sours to skepticism on delay for uranium mining
Anti-mine forces lobby in Richmond 01/26/12 Uranium mining scientific study lays out risks of uranium National Academy report cites ‘steep hurdles’ for mine 12/21/11

AS uranium mining study released
The release of the National Academy of Sciences’ study on uranium mining in Virginia is sure to intensify the debate over the proposed Coles Hill mine in Pittsylvania County — the only commercially feasible project of its kind in Virginia, the report concludes. The complete document is available here for download. 12/19/11

RRBA responds to Chmura uranium mining study
Socioeconomic impact uranium study fails to provide definite answers, Roanoke River Basin Association claiims 11/30/11

Chmura uranium mining study released
One of two studies that legislators will consider before deciding whether to lift Virginia’s ban on uranium mining has been filed with the General Assembly. Halifax County Service authority adds voice to uranium mining opposition The Halifax County Service Authority on Thursday backed a local resolution calling on state legislators to keep the ban on uranium mining until it can be shown that it can be mined safely. 10/24/11

Lake Gaston Association opposes uranium mining
  The Lake Gaston Association has become the latest organization to back the continuation of Virginia’s ban on uranium mining. 07/18/11

Mecklenburg County supervisors take stance against uranium mining
The Mecklenburg County Board of Supervisors on Monday unanimously voiced their opposition Monday to uranium mining in Virginia. 04/13/11

Experts spar over uranium mining’s hazards, benefits
  Experts say uranium mining and milling in Pittsylvania County will lower property values, make it more difficult for farmers to sell their products and greatly increase residents’ risks of illnesses and disease caused by living near a uranium mine. 03/15/10

Virginia Beach to study uranium mining’s effects
Virginia Beach will study what a proposed Pittsylvania County uranium mine and mill could do to the resort city’s water supply in the event of a weather-related disaster. “We’ve concluded that it’s very important (that) this be done,” said Thomas Leahy, director of public utilities for Virginia Beach. 01/14/10

Roanoke River Basin Advisory panel to weigh uranium mining
  The Virginia Roanoke River Basin Advisory Committee will meet Thursday, April 30 at 12:30 p.m. at the Clarksville Community Center. The topic of the meeting will be uranium mining, 04/30/09

Uranium mining opponents host forum at Chatham High
  A public forum, “Who Decides Whether Southside Virginia Will Be Sacrificed for Uranium Mining?” 04/30/09

Read all the stories above click here:
http://www.sovanow.com/index.php?/search/results/d1b92302dd00532378e0aaca0a81aab9/

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

News: Uranium Mining in VA

 




Uranium’s no. 1 hurdle

The News and RecordAug. 8
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report concluded that Virginia would face “steep hurdles” if it removes the moratorium on uranium mining. Arguably the steepest hurdle is developing a culture of safety, in which both regulators and employees, as well as elected officials and corporate executives, give priority to protecting our health and resources.
The NAS asserted, “Standards contained in regulatory programs represent only a starting point … A culture in which worker and public health, protection of environmental resources, and preservation of ecologic resources are highly valued, and continuously assessed and strengthened, is the ultimate goal of a regulatory program.” (NAS, p. 221-2)

Uranium Study Comparison:
Posted on by Admin DR

The purpose of this comparison of uranium studies is to provide a framework to examine the findings
regarding possible outcomes if uranium mining and milling occur at the Coles Hill site in Pittsylvania County, Virginia.

View pdf file http://www.drfonline.org/news/2012/documents/Uranium-Study-Board-17.pdf

This summary does not take a position on the accuracy of the studies nor does it take a pro or anti-uranium mining and milling stance. Comparison provided by DRF – www.drfonline.org.
The purpose of this comparison is to provide a summary of information for the public to use as a discussion tool. All information presented comes from the studies cited. Information presented as of 2/27/12.
Debate Continues on Uranium Mining Proposed Only 50 Miles From Roanoke:
Posted on by Admin DR
Mine Operations Would be Only Just 12 Miles From Smith Mountain LakeRoanoke Star – Gene Marrano

Virginia’s moratorium on uranium mining and whether or not it should be lifted was the subject of a pro-and-con discussion at Virginia Western Community College last Friday. The Public Forum on Uranium Mining in Virginia, centered around a large deposit of uranium found in Pittsylvania County that a Canadian company (Virginia Mining Inc.) wants to mine, was sponsored by the Cabell Brand Center for Global Poverty and Resource Sustainability.
The so-called “Coles Hill Uranium Find” in Pittsylvania County, located about 50 miles from Roanoke, has spurred a debate: Is it safe to mine uranium, used in nuclear reactors and in weapon systems, or is it too risky, considering that it is a radioactive material? What if the tailing ponds, used to contain bits of uranium left behind in the mining process, failed? Would the water table be contaminated? Is there a risk of airborne radioactivity, as bits of uranium carried off in dust from the mining site ends up affecting nearby residents or others – in Roanoke perhaps – depending on prevailing wind patterns?
“At the end of the day we’ll be so much better informed on the implications of uranium mining in Virginia,” said Rupert Cutler, the former Roanoke City Councilman who gave opening remarks. Cutler, an opponent of lifting the state’s ban on uranium mining, called the forum, attended by several hundred, “preparation,” for future legislation in the General Assembly.

NAS uranium study leader following Va. study:
STEVE SZKOTAK, Associated Press – Aug. 3, 2012
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Like many fellow Virginia residents, the chairman of National Academy of Sciences panel that studied uranium mining is following the issue as the state wrestles with the possibility of ending a 30-year ban on mining the radioactive metal.
Unlike another Virginian on the committee, however, Paul A. Locke is keeping his opinion to himself. A member of his committee, Peter deFur, publicly stated his opposition to uranium mining in Virginia last week and he outlined the reasons in detail Thursday. He called the obstacles to uranium mining “insurmountable.”
That conclusion goes beyond the NAS findings last December that Virginia faced “steep hurdles” before it could safely allow mining. The committee did not say whether a 1982 ban should be ended.

Read the above stories at:
http://keeptheban.org/

Monday, August 27, 2012

PRESS RELEASE: River Group Applauds VA-NC Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission’s Decision to Support Virginia’s Uranium Ban



 
 
For Immediate Release:  August 27, 2012
 
Contact:  Andrew Lester, 434-250-1185
 
River Group Applauds VA-NC Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission’s Decision to Support Virginia’s Uranium Ban
 
Boydton, VA -  The Roanoke River Basin Association (RRBA) applauds the resolution passed at today’s meeting of the Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission urging Virginia’s legislature to keep Virginia’s 30-year ban on uranium mining in place indefinitely.
 
A Canadian-owned company, Virginia Uranium, Inc., is seeking to lift the uranium ban to develop one of the potential uranium deposits on a site bordering the Banister River, a tributary to the Roanoke River. 
 
The North Carolina-Virginia Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission is composed of members of the legislature from both states.  The Commission’s function is to “make recommendations to local, state, and federal legislative and administrative bodies, and to others… regarding the use, stewardship, and enhancement of the Basin's water and other natural resources.”
 
Last year on May 23, 2011, the Bi-State Commission already passed a resolution urging Virginia’s General Assembly not to act on a proposal to lift the uranium ban until all then ongoning uranium studies were completed and reviewed. 
 
Since then seven studies at a total cost of $2.8 million have been completed; all of them warning Virginia’s decisionmakers that uranium mining would be a highly risky endeavor given Virginia’s unpredictable climate and the lack of state and federal experience in regulating uranium operations on the East Coast.
 
The resolution passed by the Bi-State Commission today was prompted by these studies’ findings.  The Bi-State Commission urged Virginia’s legislature to keep the uranium mining ban indefinitely to protect the Roanoke’s natural resources.
 
“We are very pleased with the Bi-State Commission’s decision to support the ban on uranium mining.  Our basin’s natural resources are the engine of the regional economy.  Agriculture and the tourism and outdoor recreation sectors bring in hundreds of millions of dollars annually to the states’ coffers.  The stigma and the risk of irreversible water contamination that uranium mining would create are incompatible with the future of our basin,” said Andrew Lester, RRBA’s executive director.  
 
 

Tropical Storm Isaac and Tips for Preparing for a Storm


Tropical ...

Update on Tropical Storm Isaac and Tips for Preparing for a Storm
            
Tropical Storm Isaac is churning in the Caribbean Sea, and the storm is currently tracking south of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We will have a better idea if and where it might hit the United States mainland in the next 12 to 24 hours.

If you live in an area that is in the current path of the storm or in coastal regions that could be affected, the Federal Emergency Management Agency advises you to listen to your local news to monitor weather updates and warnings and follow the instructions of local officials.
FEMA offers the following tips to prepare for tropical storms:
  • Tropical weather systems can bring heavy rains, flash flooding, and high winds, so if you haven’t already, visit Ready.gov for tips on creating your family emergency plan and getting an emergency kit.
  • Rains from tropical storms can cause flooding. A mere six inches of fast-moving flood water can knock over an adult. It takes only two feet of rushing water to carry away most vehicles. This includes pickups and SUVs.
  • High winds from tropical storms can cause power outages. The Consumer Product Safety Commission and U.S. Fire Administration urge consumers to use portable generators outdoors. Never use portable generators indoors or in garages. The exhaust from generators contains high levels of carbon monoxide that can quickly incapacitate and kill.
  • Everyone should also familiarize themselves with the terms that are used to identify a severe weather hazard. A Tropical Storm Warning means that tropical storm conditions are expected within 36 hours. If local officials give the order to shelter in place, take action immediately; and if the order from local officials is to evacuate, leave immediately. Monitor local radio and television news outlets or listen to NOAA Weather Radio for the latest developments.
Visit Ready.gov for more information on how to prepare for a tropical storm and check the National Hurricane Center to find the projected path of the storm.:  http://blog.usa.gov/post/30103980685/update-on-tropical-storm-isaac-and-tips-for-preparing

Uranium Working Group to meet in Virginia Beach



Posted: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:36 pm
Gov. Bob McDonnell’s Uranium Working Group will focus on air and water quality when it holds the third of five scheduled public meetings Tuesday, Aug. 28, in Virginia Beach.
 
The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Virginia Beach Convention Center.
McDonnell established the Uranium Working Group in January to examine health and safety concerns, environmental questions, and the economic impact from uranium mining.

The group includes experts from the Virginia Department of Health, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy.

Cathie J. France, deputy director of energy policy for the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy, described the group’s role as a “fact-finding mission.”

“There have been a lot of studies done and those studies have raised a lot of questions,” she said. “We have not made any conclusions. We will not take a position one way or the other on whether the ban should be lifted. The information we provide will be used by decision-makers.”

The working group hired Wright Environmental Services, a Colorado consulting firm, to help with the study. Wright will be paid more than $1 million in two separate contracts with the three state agencies.

France said the working group will produce a draft conceptual statutory and regulatory framework, but will not write regulations on uranium mining and milling unless told to do so by the General Assembly.

If legislators lift the 30-year ban, it would take about two years to draft and approve regulations for uranium mining and milling, according to Tom Bibb, a manager with the state mining department

The Uranium Working Group held its first public meeting in June in Chatham on uranium mining permitting and regulations.

A second meeting was held in Chatham earlier this month with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees uranium milling.

The working group will return to Chatham for its October meeting, which will focus on public health and safety.

Its final meeting will be in November in Richmond and will target worker health and safety and emergency preparedness and response.

The working group will present its findings to the governor in late November or early December.
It will be up to lawmakers to decide whether to lift the moratorium on uranium mining, which has been in place since 1982.

The public will have a chance to comment at the Aug. 28 meeting or can submit comments by mail or the website, www.uwg.vi.virginia.gov.

A summary of written comments will be presented at each meeting.

In addition to comments and the group’s scope of work, most of the uranium studies, including ones going back to the early 1980s, have been posted or are in the process of being posted to the website.
Citizens can also sign up for an email list.

http://www.wpcva.com/news/chathamstartribune.com/news/article_ea734968-ec7f-11e1-966b-001a4bcf887a.html

 

Meetings: Roanoke River Basin Meetings:August 27/ Governor's Uranium Meeting Tues. Aug. 28 in VA Beach, Virginia Health Department: uranium mining from 6-8 pm on Wednesday, Aug. 29 and 8 am-4 pm on Thursday, Aug 30.

 
Roanoke River Basin Meetings:
Voting on resolution to keep the uranium mining ban!
 
The Virginia Roanoke River Basin Advisory Committee (VRRBAC) and the Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission (RRBBC) will hold meetings onMonday, August 27, 2012 at the Visitor’s Center at John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, 1930 Mays Chapel Road, Boydton, VA 23917
The VRRBAC will meet from 11:00am until 12:00pm.
The RRBBC will meet following lunch from 1:00pm until 3:00pm.

 
What's in your drinking water?

Come to the Governor's Uranium Meeting Tues. Aug. 28 in VA Beach


Governor McDonnell's Uranium Work Group Meeting
Tuesday, August 28th
6 PM - 8 PM
Virginia Beach Convention Center
1000 19th St. Virginia Beach, VA 23451


We need your help! It is essential that we have a big turnout on Tuesday, August 28th at 6pm to demonstrate uranium mining IS NOT AN OPTION!

Please help us spread the message: "KEEP THE BAN" by telling co-workers, friends, relative, and neighbors, but MOST IMPORTANT, our elected officials!

Please file electronic comments stating your opposing uranium mining by going to http://www.uwg.vi.virginia.gov/index.shtml and click on "Contact Us".


Feel free to use the background info below or for more detailed information, go to: www.keeptheban.org

The Quick Update

Lake Gaston is THE PRIMARY drinking water source for about 1 million people - in Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Chesapeake, and neighboring communities in Virginia and North Carolina. Lake Gaston is located within the watershed, downstream from where uranium mining and milling is being proposed.

Lots have happened in the past year. The National Academy of Sciences shared the results of its uranium study and finished up a series of public meetings. They openly stated there are 'steep hurdles' to mining safely, and mining and processing carries with it a wide-range of adverse human health risks. One of the NAS panel members has since stated his personal opposition to uranium mining. Meanwhile, the Uranium Working Group that Governor McDonnell commissioned has also been busy this summer. They hired a consultant with close ties to the uranium industry and have been issuing reports and convening meetings to develop a regulatory framework for uranium mining.

Studies show our drinking water is at risk.


City of Virginia Beach studies indicate that the area proposed for uranium mining is vulnerable to extreme rainfall events which could cause failure of uranium waste containment structures and result in the contamination of the downstream drinking water, i.e. Lake Gaston. The City's latest report finds that in the event of significant contamination, "the City of Virginia Beach may have to cease pumping water from Lake Gaston for up to 1.5 years."

Purpose of this meeting is to discuss:

  • Water Quality monitoring plan for surface and groundwater
  • Air Quality monitoring plan
  • Virginia Water Quality Standards
  • Waterworks Regulations

**Written questions will be collected to be answered by the panel and other public comments will be taken at the conclusion of the question period.**


In case you missed the BIG meeting on the 28th, the Virginia Health Department is sponsoring two additional meetings on uranium mining from 6-8 pm on Wednesday, Aug. 29 and 8 am-4 pm on Thursday, Aug 30. There is the two hour Health Department public forum in the evening of Aug 29 at Meyera Oberndorff Library Auditorium, 4100 Virgjnia Beach Bvld., Virginia Beach. It's followed the next day, Aug 30 by a full day "small group" format at Virginia Beach Health Dept., Glass Conference Room 2nd floor, 4452 Corporation Lane, Virginia Beach. Both meetings are geared toward answering four questions:

  1. What are the public's concerns about related to the impact of uranium mining and milling on water quality and quantity of private wells?
  2. What are the public's concerns related to the impact of uranium mining and milling on recreational use of surface water?
  3. What role should VDH play in assuring that public health is protected in regard to private wells and recreational water use in regard to uranium mining and milling?
  4. What safeguards should be in place to protect private wells and recreational waste?

Sunday, August 26, 2012

VDH meeting notes in Chatham




Comments:  The bottom line to this meeting.......there are an unlimited number of questions that nobody has answered and which may not be answerable. 

Click here to read the minutes:

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=13956c5f68269905&mt=application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D13956c5f68269905%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbSIlWAMxXtYLIWwpG5ekur3m9qRdQ


Reminder: Public Meeting, August 28, 2012



Reminder: Public Meeting, August 28, 2012

This is to remind you of the upcoming public meeting of the Uranium Working Group on August 28, 2012, 6:00-8:00 pm at the Virginia Beach Convention Center, 1000 19th Street, Virginia Beach, VA 23451.

The agenda and presentation are attached and have been added to the Uranium Working Group website, www.uwg.vi.virginia.gov.

Uranium Working Group Agenda 082812.docx
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=13959ef3c7aabb4f&mt=application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D13959ef3c7aabb4f%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbSJkzksxRTZq3ow-mxQbpnjcoFddg



UWG%20Aug%2028%20Mtg[1].pptx
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.2&thid=13959ef3c7aabb4f&mt=application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D13959ef3c7aabb4f%26attid%3D0.2%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbSN4isOUH_dZYQQU6oDS3WK5q5Dmw

Saturday, August 25, 2012

State urged to reject uranium mining


Local
Source: Gainesville Times
FRIDAY, AUGUST 24 2012

One after another, they urged a gubernatorial-appointed committee to oppose uranium mining in Virginia.

On Aug. 15, the "uranium working group" received public comments about the topic in The Barn at Lord Fairfax Community College near Warrenton.

About 50 people attended and 19 spoke at the two-hour meeting, which ended at 8 p.m.
So far, the working group, which includes high-level state agency officials, has held three such gatherings around the state to hear about the mining and milling of uranium.

Maureen E. Dempsey, Virginia's chief deputy for Public Health, said comments and relevant materials would be collected in a report and released in early December.

Virginia Uranium Inc., established in 2007, wants to mine and mill uranium on 3,500 aces it controls in Pittsylvania County in Southwest Virginia, near the North Carolina border.
But no state regulations exist to allow such practices.

The company's interest in mining radioactive material from about 100 acres of the Coles Hill project site prompted the state to study the practice.

The working group limited the focus of the Aug. 15 meeting to the effects that uranium mining might have on private well water and water bodies for recreational use.

Some speakers said potential impacts on public water supplies also should be included in the discussion.

Bill Speider of Orange County raised concerns about the potentially negative effects that uranium mining and milling could have on property values, tourism and agriculture.

Who would compensate farmers and their market losses if their products get exposed to uranium? Speider asked.

Kit Johnston spoke about the potential for "irreparable" damage that uranium contamination at the Coles Hill site might do to water supplies that serve Virginia and North Carolina homeowners and farmers.

May Miculis warned that no state would take the uranium waste produced by Virginia Uranium.
Allowing uranium mining in the state would raise suspicions about the safety of Virginia products like beef and wine, causing people to reject them, Miculis said. "It's tainted," people will say of such products, she said. "It's radioactive. It's nuclear."

Rob Marmet, senior energy policy analyst for the Piedmont Environmental Council, blasted the uranium working group's approach to the study.

Marmet argued that the group should have first prepared a report, gathering the necessary information and then put it out for public review.

Instead, the process puts "the entire burden on the people out there" to raise critical questions and contribute research, he suggested.

"I think it's absolutely unconscionable to do it that way," Marmet said. "That's putting the cart before the horse."

The audience burst into loud applause.

But because of intense opposition, the company dropped its effort and the mineral leases expired.

The Piedmont Environmental Council played a major role in derailing the company's efforts.

Last week, the uranium working group met at the Warrenton Volunteer Rescue Squad Building for a daylong roundtable discussion about uranium mining. Seventeen people signed up to participate in the talk.

Read more:
http://www.gainesville-times.com/news/2012/aug/24/state-urged-reject-uranium-mining/

Friday, August 24, 2012

Governor’s Workaround Uranium Meeting in VA Beach Aug. 28: Need Big Turnout!


 

Meeting: Sept. 13 “Local and Site-Specific Factors: mining and milling uranium at Coles Hill”

 

Where: Olde Dominion Agricultural Foundation in Chatham.




When: September 13, 2012 7-9 pm



Who: Presentation by Val Green, mining engineer sponsored by Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League



Questions: Contact Ann Rogers 540-312-3104

http://www.vcnva.org/anx/index.cfm/1,93,2834,0,html/Sept-13-Local-and-Site-Specific-Factors-mining-and-milling-uranium-at-Coles-Hill

Thursday, August 23, 2012

History of Mine tailings dam failures


History of Mine tailings dam failures


Mine tailings dam failure and floodplain impacts on Soda Butte Creek, Montana and Yellowstone National Park
Related publication:  Marcus, W.A., Meyer, G.A., Nimmo, D.R., 2001, Geomorphic control of persistent mine impacts in a Yellowstone Park stream and implications for the recovery of fluvial systems: Geology, v. 29, no. 4, p. 355-358. (PDF file of article)
http://epswww.unm.edu/facstaff/gmeyer/tails/dambreak.htm

NRC FINES UNITED NUCLEAR $100,000 FOR FAILING TO SET ASIDE FUNDS FOR DECOMMISSIONING CHURCH ROCK URANIUM MILL

(Feb 14, 1997) "The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a fine of $100,000 against United Nuclear Corporation, of Gallup, New Mexico, for failing to properly comply with a January 1992 order to set aside $16.4 million needed to decommission and decontaminate the Church Rock uranium mill site near Gallup." [NRC Region IV Press Relase 97/10]
> View Notice of Violation EA 93-170

Kennecott Hides Potential for Deadly


Tailings Disaster
The Salt Lake Tribune is reporting that Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. has concealed, since 1988, the potential for an earthquake-caused major tailings disaster in Magna ...
www.northwoodswild.org/component/


content/article/57

We already have enough pollution disasters in our history. 1. Some 1.7 million tons of uranium tailings were dumped directly into the creeks and lakes of Port Radium, with ...
uww.raniumcitizensinquiry.com/submissions/


submission14.html

failure
Stava tailings dam failure, Trento, Italy. One of the worst tailings disasters in history
www.tailings.info/stava.htm


Major tailings dam failures

Jul. 21, 2011  Mianyang City, Songpan County, Sichuan Province, China , tailings dam damaged from landslides caused from heavy rains , tailings damaged residential roads and houses, forcing 272 people to leave; tailings were washed into the Fujiang River, leaving 200,000 people without drinking water supply

Oct. 4, 2010 Kolontár, Hungary, tailings dam failure , 700,000 cubic metres of caustic red mud , several towns flooded, 10 people killed, approx. 120 people injured, 8 square kilometres flooded

Dec. 22, 2008 Kingston fossil plant, Harriman, Tennessee, USA , retention wall failure , Release of 5.4 million cubic yards [4.1 million cubic metres] of ashy slurry , The ash slide covered 400 acres [1.6 square kilometres] as deep as 6 feet [1.83 metres]. The wave of ash and mud toppled power lines, covered Swan Pond Road and ruptured a gas line. It damaged 12 homes, and one person had to be rescued, though no one was seriously hurt.

April 14, 2005 Bangs Lake, Jackson County, Mississippi, USA , phosphogypsum stack failure, because the company was trying to increase the capacity of the pond at a faster rate than normal, according to Officials with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (the company has blamed the spill on unusually heavy rainfall, though) , approx. 17 million gallons of acidic liquid (64,350 m3) . liquid poured into adjacent marsh lands, causing vegetation to die

2004, Nov. 30 Pinchi Lake, British Columbia, Canada , tailings dam (100-metres long and 12-metres high) collapses during reclamation work , 6,000 to 8,000 m3 of rock, dirt and waste water , tailings spilled into 5,500 ha Pinchi Lake

2004, Sep. 5 Riverview, Florida, USA , a dike at the top of a 100-foot-high gypsum stack holding 150-million gallons of polluted water broke after waves driven by Hurricane Frances bashed the dike's southwest corner , 60 million gallons (227,000 m3) of acidic liquid , liquid spilled into Archie Creek that leads to Hillsborough Bay

2004, March 20 Malvési, Aude, France , decantation and evaporation pond of uranium conversion plan, dam failure after heavy rain in preceding year , 30,000 cubic metres of liquid and slurries , release led to elevated nitrate concentrations of up to 170 mg/L in the canal of Tauran for several weeks

2000, Oct. 11 Inez, Martin County, Kentucky, USA, tailings dam failure from collapse of an underground mine beneath the slurry impoundment, release of 2.5 million m3 of liquid into an adjacent settling pond, subsequent release of 1.5 million m3 of water (carrying some residual slurry) from the settling pond into the environment

1997, Dec. 7 Mulberry Phosphate, Polk County, Florida, USA, 
phosphogypsum stack failure , 200,000 m3 of phosphogypsum process water , biota in the Alafia River eliminated

1997, Oct. 22  Pinto Valley, Arizona, USA , tailings dam slope failure external link , 230,000 m3 of tailings and mine rock , tailings flow covers 16 hectares

1994, Nov. 19  Hopewell Mine, Hillsborough County, Florida, USA , dam failure , phosphate , Nearly 1.9 million m3 of water from a clay settling pond , spill into nearby wetlands and the Alafia River, Keysville flooded

1994, Payne Creek Mine, Polk County, Florida, USA , Fort Meade, Florida, USA , IMC-Agrico, Florida, USA :  phosphate

1994, Feb. 14 Olympic Dam, Roxby Downs, South Australia copper, uranium , leakage of tailings dam during 2 years or more , release of up to 5 million m3 of contaminated water into subsoil

1993, Oct. Gibsonton, Florida, USA , phosphate , Fish killed when acidic water spilled into Archie Creek

1991, Aug. 23 Sullivan mine, Kimberley, British Columbia, Canada, dam failure (liquefaction in old tailings foundation during construction of incremental raise) , dam failure (liquefaction in old tailings foundation during construction of incremental raise)

1988-1980, Tennessee Consolidated No.1, Grays Creek, TN, USA , Montcoal No.7, Raleigh County, West Virginia, USA, Olinghouse, Wadsworth, Nevada, USA , dam failure

1981, Dec. 18 Ages, Harlan County, Kentucky, USA , dam failure after heavy rain , 96,000 m3 coal refuse slurry , the slurry wave traveled the Left Fork of Ages Creek 1.3 km downstream, 1 person was killed, 3 homes destroyed, 30 homes damaged, fish kill in Clover Fork of the Cumberland River

1980, Oct. 13 Tyrone, New Mexico, USA dam wall breach, due to rapid increase in dam wall height, causing high internal pore pressure , 2 million m3 , tailings flow 8 km downstream and inundate farmland

1979, July 16 Church Rock, New Mexico, USA,  uranium , dam wall breach, due to differential foundation settlement , 370,000 m3 of radioactive water, 1,000 tonnes of contaminated sediment , Contamination of Rio Puerco sediments up to 110 km downstream

1979 or earlier (unidentified), British Columbia, Canada , piping in the sand beach of the tailings dam, 40,000 m3 of ponded water , considerable property damage

1977, Feb. 1  Homestake, Milan, New Mexico, USA, uranium , dam failure, due to rupture of plugged slurry pipeline , 30,000 m3 ,

1975-1965, Silverton, Colorado, USA, Mike Horse, Montana, USA , Deneen Mica, North Carolina, USA , unidentified), Southwestern USA , Fort Meade, Florida, USA , (unidentified), East Texas, USA :  dam failure , CO:  tailings flow slide polluted nearly 100 miles (160 km) of the Animas river and its tributaries; severe property damage; no injuries

1972, Feb. 26 Buffalo Creek, West Virginia, USA , collapse of tailings dam after heavy rain (view Citizens' Commission report external link, 500,000 m3 , the tailings traveled 27 km downstream, 125 people lost their lives, 500 homes were destroyed. Property and highway damage exceeded $65 million. (see details external link)

http://www.wise-uranium.org/mdaf.html

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Toxic legacy of uranium haunts proposed Colorado mill

Posted: 09/05/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT
Updated: 09/05/2010 02:48:13 PM MDT
By Nancy Lofholm
The Denver Post

GRAND JUNCTION — As Colorado nears the possible approval of the nation's first new uranium mill in a quarter century, the federal government and state continue to deal with the staggeringly expensive and never- ending mess left by earlier mills.

More than a billion dollars has been spent cleaning up radioactive tailings piles and lessening toxic leaks into rivers and aquifers at nine defunct mills in Colorado. Nearly 20 million tons of radioactive tailings sit in disposal sites where they must be monitored in perpetuity. Hundreds of acres of unusable water fill contaminated aquifers.

Much has changed in the understanding of uranium milling since that toxic legacy was created. New regulations are in place to make the industry safer. But those regulations are still untested. Costs for dealing with its inevitable contamination are as long-lived as its radioactive leavings: The state's latest regulations call for the monitoring of new mill waste for 1,000 years.

A full picture of all the taxpayer and privately funded expenses for past cleanup and ongoing monitoring and maintenance is not available because multiple agencies — the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment — along with multiple programs within those agencies, have a hand in overseeing the uranium legacy. The only federal cost information available is 5 years old.

Using those federal figures, The Denver Post found that, so far, the cleanup cost of mills in Colorado ranges from $50 million to $504 million per mill.

Nonetheless, the state is requiring that owners of the proposed new mill put up only $12 million in a bond for cleanup — an inadequate pittance in the opinion of mill opponents with an eye on history.


Read more: Toxic legacy of uranium haunts proposed Colorado mill - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_15996355#ixzz22ne1F6QK
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Uranium Mill Tailings:

The Atlas Site in Moab, Utah


Uranium Mill Tailings: Naturally radioactive residue from the processing of uranium ore. Although the milling process recovers about 95 percent of the uranium, the residues, or tailings, contain several naturally-occurring radioactive elements, including uranium, thorium, radium, polonium, and radon. -(http://www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartt/index.html) explains Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings. Subpart W; Operating Uranium Mill Tailings Piles - This page (http://www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartw/index.html)explains Operating Uranium Mill
Uranium Mill Tailings | Radiation Protection | US EPA07-08-2011
... Uranium mill tailings are the radioactive sandlike materials that remain after
uranium is extracted by milling ore mined from the earth. ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/radwaste/402-k-94-001-umt.html
Radiation Glossary UZ | Radiation Protection | US EPA07-08-2011
... Uranium Mill Tailings. naturally radioactive residue from the processing of
uranium ore. Although the milling process recovers about 95 percent of ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/glossary/termuvwxyz.html
[PDF] Nevada Gold Cyanide Mill Tailings Regulation: A Comparison ...04-04-2012
... Historically, uranium mills piled tailings without covers or ... In addition, most
uranium milling facilities are no ... with the uranium mill tailings piles still ...
http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd/ldr/mine/goldvur.pdf
[PDF] Feasability Analysis: A Comparison of Phosphogysum and ...04-04-2012
... Commission (NRC) regulates active uranium milling and inactive uranium
mill tailings disposal sites ... use source material for uranium mills is a ...
http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd/ldr/mine/gypvu.pdf
[ More results from www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd ]
Rad NESHAPs Subpart W: Operating Uranium Mill Tailings ...07-31-2012
... Subpart W: Operating Uranium Mill Tailings. ... less than 1 percent uranium,
uranium milling produces large ... are 26 NRC-licensed uranium mills in the ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartw/
[PDF] Uranium Mill Tailings Radon Flux Calulations04-23-2012
Page 1. Page 2. Page 3. Page 4. Page 5. Page 6. Page 7. Page 8. Page 9.
Page 10. Page 11. Page 12. Page 13. Page 14. Page 15. Page 16. Page ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartw/docket%20files/uraniumfl...
[ More results from www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartw ]
Rad NESHAPs Subpart T: Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings ...07-31-2012
... Subpart T: Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings. ... The Department of Energy
controls 24 abandoned uranium mill tailings piles. ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartt/
[PDF] National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from ...03-02-2010
... commonly referred to as uranium mills and their ... content of the tailings does
not ... impoundment means any uranium mill tailings impoundment which ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/neshaps/40cfr61subpart-w.pdf
[PDF] The long term stabilization of uranium mill tailings03-03-2010
... into areas contaminated by uranium mining and milling. ... in situations at mine,
mill and tailings ... for releases of radionuclides from uranium mines and ...
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/neshaps/subpart-w/historical-rulemak...
[ More results from www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/neshaps ]
Environmental Surveys of the Uranium Mill Tailings Pile and ...--
... in Dwellings Constructed on or with Uranium Mill Tailings — Surgeon General ...
Located near Uran- ium Mills Appendix F ... for the Vitro Tailings Pile in ...
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=9100OJ1Z.txt

Monday, August 20, 2012

Virginia Drought Regions

Drought Warning Issued on August 14, 2012, by Va. DEQ for Appomattox River Basin; Drought Watch for northern Piedmont and Roanoke River Basin

On August 14, 2012, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued a “drought warning” advisory for the Appomattox Basin, including the following localities: the counties of Amelia, Appomattox, Buckingham, Chesterfield, Cumberland, Dinwiddie, Nottoway, Powhatan, Prince Edward, and Prince George; the cities of Colonial Heights, Hopewell, and Petersburg; and the towns of Appomattox, Blackstone, Burkeville, Crewe, and Farmville. 

The DEQ had issued a drought “watch” for the basin on July 26. 

Also on August 14, the DEQ issued a drought watch advisory for the northern Piedmont and the Roanoke River basin. 

The Piedmont localities include the counties of Greene, Madison, Rappahannock, Orange, Culpeper, Louisa, Spotsylvania and Stafford; the city of Fredericksburg; and the towns of Culpeper, Gordonsville, Louisa, Mineral, Madison, Orange, Stanardsville, and Washington. 

The Roanoke basin localities include the counties of Patrick, Franklin, Roanoke, Henry, Bedford, Pittsylvania, Campbell, Halifax, Charlotte, and Mecklenburg; the cities of Bedford, Danville, Martinsville, Salem, and Roanoke; and the towns of Altavista, Brookneal, Charlotte Court House, Drakes Branch, Keysville, Phenix, Boones Mill, Rocky Mount, Halifax, Scottsburg, South Boston, Virgilina, Ridgeway, Boydton, Broadnax, Chase City, Clarksville, La Crosse, South Hill, Stuart, Chatham, Gretna, Hurt, and Vinton. 

According to the DEQ, “drought warning responses are required when the onset of a significant drought event is imminent. Water conservation and contingency plans that were prepared during the drought watch stage should be implemented. 

Water conservation activities at this stage generally are voluntary, but this does not preclude localities issuing mandatory restrictions if appropriate.” A drought watch advisory is issued to “increase awareness of conditions that are likely to precede a significant drought event and to facilitate preparation for a drought.” 

The DEQ’s drought-monitoring Web page is at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/WaterSupplyWaterQuantity/Drought.aspx.
Sources: Virginia issues ‘drought watch’ advisory for Appomattox River basin, Virginia DEQ News Release, 7/26/12; and Conditions in Appomattox River basin lead to ‘drought warning’ status, Virginia DEQ News Release, 8/14/12
Five area localities face mandatory water restrictions
Once again, mandatory water restrictions will be imposed on the five jurisdictions supplied by the Appomattox River Water Authority.
The authority voted Thursday to require the restrictions beginning next Thursday.
The restrictions are prompted by scarce rainfall, low groundwater levels and falling water levels at Lake Chesdin, the authority's 3,100-acre reservoir on the Chesterfield-Dinwiddie county line, said ARWA Executive Director Robert C. Wichser.
"Since October, we are down in precipitation 10 to 12 inches," he said Friday. "The groundwater levels have dropped 70-75 percent."
http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/aug/18/tdmet01-five-area-localities-face-mandatory-water--ar-2139017/?referer=http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftimesdispatch.com%2Far%2F2139017%2F&h=6AQHq09NG&s=1&shorturl=http://bit.ly/PkOHxT

VIRGINIA DROUGHT MONITORING TASK FORCE
Drought Status Report August 13, 2012
Relatively low rainfall and extreme heat conditions continued across Virginia throughout July. The National Weather Service’s Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Services (AHPS) web pages showing departures from normal rainfall over the past 30, 60 and 90 days
http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/news/pdf/drought-taskforce.pdf


Meetings: The Virginia Roanoke River Basin Advisory Committee (VRRBAC) and the Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission (RRBBC)


Visitor's Center at John H. Kerr Dam & Reservoir (Buggs Island Lake) - US Army Corps of Engineers


 
The Virginia Roanoke River Basin Advisory Committee (VRRBAC) and the Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission (RRBBC) will hold meetings on Monday, August 27, 2012

at the Visitor’s Center at John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir,
1930 Mays Chapel Road, Boydton, VA  23917.

The  VRRBAC will meet from 11:00am until 12:00pm. 

The RRBBC will meet following lunch from 1:00pm until 3:00pm.

The agenda for the meeting is attached, as well as the resolution passed by the Roanoke River Basin Association and the North Carolina delegation to the RRBBC regarding uranium mining. 

VRRBAC members are asked to review the resolution and provide any feedback on requested changes to Chairman Mike McEvoy (mike.mcevoy@westernvawater.org) prior to the meeting or present your comments at the meeting.  Please note that you should respond only to the Chairman and not to the entire group to comply with FOIA.  Minutes of the May VRRBAC meeting are also attached.

The RRBBC will meet following lunch from 1:00pm until 3:00pm.  The agenda for this meeting is attached, as well as the minutes from the July meeting.  Frank Yelverton from the US Army Corps of Engineers is scheduled to give the group an update on the Kerr 216 Study.  The RRBBC will discuss and consider a resolution regarding uranium mining following consideration by the VRRBAC (earlier meeting).

Please let me know whether or not you are planning to attend this meeting so we can get an accurate count for lunch, which will be provided by the Roanoke River Basin Association.  A response byThursday, August 23 is appreciated.

VRRBAC members may have had a meeting on their calendars for September 12, based on our earlier meeting schedule. A meeting for this date is not scheduled at this time, so you can remove that from your calendars.

As always, let me know if you have questions or need additional information.  I look forward to seeing you on the 27th!

Tammy D. Stephenson
Program Coordinator
Office of Water Supply
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
3019 Peters Creek Road
Roanoke, Virginia  24019
PH (540) 562-6828
tammy.stephenson@deq.virginia.gov
http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/WaterSupplyWaterQuantity/WaterSupplyPlanning.aspx

5 attachments —

Agenda_08 27  2012_VRRBAC.pdf:  https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=1392abfc10ab1501&mt=application/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D1392abfc10ab1501%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbQTt7sIamCxCgGFFHLeO2vPT3zEzw&pli=1
VRRBAC Minutes 05 14 2012.pdf:  https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.2&thid=1392abfc10ab1501&mt=application/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D1392abfc10ab1501%26attid%3D0.2%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbQA-CgJHIreIebvoOXidBtaBhJIdg
RRBA and NC__resolution re UM.docx:  https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.3&thid=1392abfc10ab1501&mt=application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D1392abfc10ab1501%26attid%3D0.3%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbSrr1edfL1VdBpSvk_xTzf0HQhTYA
RRBBC_draft minutes7-25-12.pdf:  https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.4&thid=1392abfc10ab1501&mt=application/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D1392abfc10ab1501%26attid%3D0.4%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbSTSZEVYQ0qwpgCLM5Om8XIwWRW1w
8-27-12_RRBBC_Agenda.pdf:  https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.5&thid=1392abfc10ab1501&mt=application/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D8c0bd0ee1b%26view%3Datt%26th%3D1392abfc10ab1501%26attid%3D0.5%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&sig=AHIEtbQx7LYBMZQlEQ68aVaa3g5ksdhVGA