Thursday, March 31, 2011

Don't Drink the Rainwater

Monday, Mar 28, 2011

The Virginia Department of Health has issued a warning to state residents: do not drink rainwater.

The warning comes after radioactive particles released in Japan have been documented around the United States and now in places on the East Coast.

From a release issued Sunday:
VDH is advising residents that the state’s drinking water supplies remain safe, but reminds Virginians out of an abundance of caution they should avoid using rainwater collected in cisterns as drinking water.

Virginia officials say that trace amounts of radioactive material have been detected across the country. "As a result of the incident with the nuclear power plant in Japan, several EPA air monitors have detected very low levels of radioactive material in the U.S.," state health commissioner Karen Remley said.

"To date, none of Virginia's multiple monitoring systems has detected a level of radioactive material that would pose a public-health concern."

Although radiation readings have yet to raise real alarm, Virginian health officials have stepped up testing as a precaution. Scheduled monitoring of air, drinking water, vegetation, and milk will be moved up by a week to begin this Monday. Officials are also coordinating with federal and state partners to keep tabs on the concern.

State health officials there say testing of rain water samples has not revealed any greater radiation readings. Maryland officials are telling residents that there is no need right now for residents to take potassium iodide tablets, the drug that protects the thyroid gland from radiation exposure.

Concerns about radioactivity on the East Coast come after trace amounts of the radioactive isotope Iodine-131 were found in rainwater samples in Boston. Public health officials there said the material matched particles released by the reactor in Sendai, Japan.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Uranium issue in Virginia dates to 1970s

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Virginia Uranium Inc. is working to remove Virginia’s moratorium on the mining, milling and processing of uranium ore, according to the Dan River Basin Association (DRBA) website at www.danriver.org.

The issue dates back to the late 1970s, when Marline Corp. began searching for uranium deposits in the eastern United States. By 1982, the company stated it had discovered 30 million pounds of uranium oxide in Pittsylvania County, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch and online information at www.virginiaplaces.org.

That year, Virginia legislators approved a moratorium on the mining of uranium, the milling of yellowcake and the disposal of radioactive waste, according to the website.

Marline Corp. obtained leases on 40,000 uranium-rich acres in Pittsylvania County and 16,000 acres in Fauquier, Madison, Culpeper and Orange counties, the website stated.

In November 2007, the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy approved a permit for exploring 194 acres in Pittsylvania County, called the Coles Hill site. Work there began about a month later, according to the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) website.

The following year, the General Assembly rejected an industry-backed proposal for a study that could have led to a lifting of the moratorium on uranium mining, the SELC’s website states. Instead, a legislative subcommittee is facilitating a study by the National Academy of Sciences. That is one of four studies that are under way, according to the DRBA website.

The SELC’s website lists those studies as:

• The National Academy of Sciences, which is collecting and reviewing existing reports and data on uranium mining and milling to help determine whether uranium mining can be done safely in Virginia. It is scheduled to be done by the end of this year;

• The uranium industry is supporting a study on socio-economic impacts by Chmura Economics & Analytics, a firm with ties to the coal mining industry;

• A study on the potential uranium production at Coles Hill as it relates to water quality is under way by the city of Virginia Beach, which is downstream of the Coles Hill site;

• The Danville Regional Foundation is investing up to $530,000 in a study by RTI International, a research institution.

Earlier this month, Walter Coles Jr., executive vice president of Virginia Uranium, the company has worked to win over legislators who will decide whether the ban should be lifted.

In a webcast with the investors recorded in February, Coles said Virginia Uranium has lined up sponsors of the legislation.

“In January of 2012, we will have a bill in the state legislature that directs the Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy to develop the regulations for uranium mining,” Coles said during the webcast

http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/article.cfm?ID=27725

Sunday, March 27, 2011

EPA Warns, “Children Act Fast...So Do Poisons,” in Observance of Poison Prevention Week

CONTACTS
Jalil Isa (Media Only)
Isa.jalil@epa.gov
202-564-3226
202-564-4355

Dale Kemery
kemery.dale@epa.gov
202-564-7839
202-564-4355

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 16, 2011

EPA Warns, “Children Act Fast...So Do Poisons,” in Observance of Poison Prevention Week

National awareness campaign planned for March 20-26 to reduce poisonings in U.S.

WASHINGTON – In ongoing efforts to protect people’s health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is collaborating with the Poison Prevention Week Council to encourage the public to keep poisonous substances out of the hands of children. In observance of National Poison Prevention Week (March 20-26), EPA recommends that locking household cleaners, disinfectants, solvents and other materials is the best way to reduce accidental poisoning among children.

“Because it takes only a split second for a child to be poisoned, we want everyone to remember the theme ‘Children Act Fast…So Do Poisons.’ Most exposures that occur in the home can be prevented or substantially reduced through proper and safe storage, use and supervision of all household products,” said Steve Owens, assistant administrator of EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “Poison Prevention Week serves as a reminder for everyone to keep pesticides locked up and away from children, and to read and follow all labels to minimize the potential dangers from pesticides.”

EPA promotes poison prevention each year to increase public awareness of the potential danger to children from pesticides and other household products. In 2009, the American Association of Poison Control Centers reported that more than half of the 2.4 million poisoning incidents each year involve children younger than six years old. Leading causes of poisonings include cosmetics such as perfume and nail polish, deodorant and soap, household cleaning products and medications.

Adults are also susceptible to poisoning (intentional or unintentional), but from generally different sources, including pain medicines, sedatives (drugs to reduce anxiety), sleeping pills, antipsychotics used to treat mental illness, household cleaning products, antidepressants, cardiovascular drugs (drugs to treat heart disease) and alcohols.

Anyone who has been exposed to a pesticide or other toxic substance and may be experiencing non-life-threatening symptoms should call the National Poison Center hotline at 1-800-222-1222. In case of more serious exposures, call 911. In addition, EPA urges the public to report all pesticide exposures to the product manufacturer (including the registration number found on the product label of all pesticide products registered by EPA). Registered manufacturers are required to report these incidents to EPA, and the agency uses the data to decide whether additional regulatory action is needed.

More information on poison prevention: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/poisonprevention.htm

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Tips: Keep energy from going to waste


MARY HARDBARGER
The Roanoke Times
mary.hardbarger@roanoke.com, 381-1679

BLACKSBURG -- About 50 people packed into Blacksburg library's community room last week eager to learn about ways to cut back on energy expenses.

The library held a Simple Energy Saving Techniques open house with guest speakers addressing the negatives of drafty houses and old household appliances and the positives of new, innovative energy-saving technologies.

Gearing up for one of the coldest months of the year, many asked questions and sought solutions to ever-increasing electric bills.

Nathan and Lori Francis of Blacksburg browsed the speakers' exhibits with their young daughters in tow.

The couple, like many in attendance, was looking for ways to save on household appliances and decrease their environmental footprint.

The Francis family was interested in finding out more about solar panels, a technology becoming more common in the New River Valley and considered a smart investment, according to Dave Roper, who gave a presentation on house energy renovations.

Roper, a retired Virginia Tech physics professor, recently sat down to discuss energy solutions for renters and homeowners alike.

He also addressed the latest energy-saving technologies such as solar energy and energy audits people can invest in, and why they should it soon.

"This is the best place to invest right now," Roper said. "It may cost a little money, but it's worth it for the future."

Q What can renters do to cut energy costs in their apartments, homes or townhomes?

a The main use of energy is heating in wintertime in this area. More energy -- about twice the amount -- is used in the wintertime than in the summertime.

There's not much renters can do about insulation, but one thing they can do is have heavy curtain on the windows. They should be closed when they're not in the room. The more insulation you can put on your windows, the better.

Renters can also change lighting. It's small, but it has an effect. You should take out the incandescent bulbs and replace them with LEDs (light-emitting diode). When you move out, you can put the incandescent light back in and take the LEDs where ever you move ... I'm not pushing CFLs (compact fluorescent light bulb) because I think LEDs is where we are going. And be sure to buy a good brand, not something you've never heard of before ...

Q What are simple, day-to-day, inexpensive practices anyone can do to save energy?

AIf you're living in a home, composting is something everybody should do. There are many different ways to do it ... I think it's amazing how much garbage you accumulate in your kitchen, and most people just throw it in the trash.

As you know, Virginia Tech just started composting. They're not composting what's left over when eaten, they're composting what's over when they're preparing food, which is still a lot of stuff...

In the home, you can also turn your thermostat down when you're not in the house. Or, you can set your thermostat to automatically kick-on or off throughout the day.


Q What are some trends you've seen in homes that are more energy efficient?

A I think you're seeing a lot of people doing energy audits.

Q What is an energy audit?

A First of all, energy auditors want to find out how leaky your house is. They do this with a blower. They open a door and put up a big fan and close up the rest of the door. They have some electronics that measure how much air is being pulled out of your house.

You close all the other windows and doors in your house, and they start sucking air out. Then, they calculate air exchanges per hour, and there's a certain criteria they're looking for. They say a good home would have, I think, 35 percent of air sucked out in an hour. Our house had 100 and some percent of air being sucked out in an hour. That meant we had a lot of leaks.

While they're doing that, they also use an infrared camera. They take a picture of a certain area in the house with a regular camera then one with the infrared camera. For example, on our kitchen ceiling, one whole area was cold, which meant it looked dark on the infrared camera.

There was a vent above our range, and the vent was leaking. It was sucking out the air. I knew I needed to put a special vent there and found a cheap one. I also put a new vent on the dryer vent outside.

Those things keep air from coming back in, if put on properly. Another example was in our den, where we have a sloping ceiling. The little triangle at the top was cold, but the rest of the wall was OK.

When the house was built, someone didn't bother to put any insulation in that place, and the camera found that. So, I had someone come in and blow some insulation up there. These are two basic instruments used in an energy audit, and I think more and more people are beginning to do this ...

When somebody asks me, particularly homeowners, "What should I do?" I say an energy audit. If you do this, you're going to find out things about your home you had no idea about ...

Q Why is it so important to invest in these type of energy-saving practices now?

A Because the price of electricity has gone up rapidly. It's doubled in the last three or four years, and it's going to continue to do that ...

In about 10 years from now, prices of all energy is going to go up. The only thing we're going to be able to do is to go solar.

When you invest in the stock market, they say you want to leave the money in long term, because then you'll make money. But you won't if you take it out, because you never know what's going to happen. With energy investment, you'll always know you're going to gain ... It's a no-brainer.

If you have the money, or even if you don't have the money and you can borrow it, that's the best place to invest. Invest in energy efficiency first, and then invest in renewable energy.

For more information on energy-saving tips, visit http://www.sustianableblacksburg.org/
Read more: http://www.roanoke.com/news/nrv/wb/275675

Friday, March 25, 2011

Harnish: Virginia can become East's clean-energy capital



By CHELSEA HARNISH
Published: January 24, 2011

There has been a lot of talk between the end of last year's General Assembly session and today about the potential to make Virginia the "Energy Capital of the East."

This session there are some concrete opportunities for our lawmakers to put us on that path. There will be several crucial pieces of clean-energy legislation before the General Assembly this session that will present the opportunity to embrace our clean-energy potential. In the absence of a mandatory Renewable Electricity Standard, Virginia must develop aggressive programs and incentives to demonstrate our commitment to renewable technology that will allow Virginia's industry to flourish and become a leader in the burgeoning U.S. renewable energy market.

The first opportunity is Sen. A. Donald McEachin's legislation, SB 814. This bill would protect the Chesapeake Bay and its resources from the threat of offshore oil drilling by extending the existing drilling buffer to 75 miles from 50 miles. The bill would also provide support for the permitting of commercial-scale offshore wind projects in federal waters. Virginia cannot afford to be left behind our neighboring states in the quest for offshore wind development.

We cannot drill our way out of our foreign oil addiction or to a sustainable energy future. Drilling prolongs and expands dependence on fossil fuels, threatening Hampton Roads twice: with oil spills and with sea-level rise due to climate change. Virginia should explore alternatives that will meet our energy needs while decreasing our reliance on fossil fuels.

In addition to our unrealized wind potential, Virginia is falling behind neighboring states in solar energy. Currently less than 1 percent of our energy comes from solar, despite Virginia having some of the best solar potential in the Mid-Atlantic region. With the right policies in place, Virginia could install 2,000 megawatts of solar photovoltaic capacity by 2030, powering 50,000 homes and businesses.

The Chesapeake Climate Action Network is supporting an initiative being introduced by Sen. Mary Margaret Whipple (SB 975) and Del. Adam P. Ebbin (HB 2191) to secure a budget-neutral funding stream to provide low-interest solar loans to residential customers. This publicly funded, revolving loan program will give assistance to Virginia residents who wish to "green" their homes. The money for these loans would come from utility customers who voluntarily donate through their utility payments to a loan program that would be created and administered by the state government.

Our last priority legislation would require utilities to set up a rate structure that promotes energy efficiency while reducing overall energy consumption. In Virginia, residential customers lack sufficient economic incentives to reduce electricity consumption. To that end, SB 907, sponsored by Sen. McEachin, would direct the State Corporation Commission to order utilities to develop an appropriate pricing strategy to incentivize residential customers to reduce their consumption. Inclining block rates (IBR) is just such a strategy and is designed so that the more electricity consumers use, the more they pay, sending a price signal, especially to high-use residential customers, to reduce their consumption.

IBR is the simplest, quickest and least expensive way for utilities to reduce overall consumption. Inclining block rates keep rates affordable for low-income customers, who tend to consume less energy, while shielding fixed-income customers from rate increases. This rate structure would also motivate high-use consumers to make investments in energy efficiency upgrades. Investor-owned utilities that have implemented an IBR structure in other states have demonstrated a reduction in overall consumption of between 1 and 6 percent.

All three of these initiatives put Virginia on the path to achieving Gov. Bob McDonnell's goal to become the "Energy Capital of the East" by increasing investments in renewables such as wind and solar and energy efficiency. Please call your legislators today and ask them to vote for these important bills as they come up for a vote.

Read more:
http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/jan/24/TDOPIN02-harnish-virginia-can-become-easts-clean-e-ar-793341/

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Virginia’s offshore wind energy

march 08, 2011

The waters off of Virginia are well-suited for offshore wind power production. Secretary Salazar included Virginia in his designation of offshore wind farm areas.

At a morning press conference in Norfolk, United States Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and United States Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar unveiled the official coordinated strategic plan for offshore wind energy development in the United States. The McDonnell Administration was represented at the event by Secretary of Commerce and Trade Jim Cheng and Secretary of Natural Resources Doug Domenech. Governor Bob McDonnell issued the following statement regarding the announcement.

“Cost effective development of Virginia’s offshore wind resources is one important component of our overall effort to make Virginia, “The Energy Capital of the East Coast.” We must generate more of our electricity from our domestic resources. That means utilizing a diverse portfolio of fuels, as well as biomass, offshore and onshore wind power, and solar. At the same time we must also maintain reasonable energy costs and a reliable, consistent supply. This Administration is focused on balancing these two important considerations.

It was fitting that Secretary Chu and Secretary Salazar chose the Commonwealth for today’s announcement. Virginia is uniquely positioned to lead the nation in the development of a reliable domestic offshore wind turbines industry that produces affordable energy for our homes and businesses. The waters off of Virginia are well-suited for offshore wind power production. The gradual slope of the continental shelf, consistent wind speeds, and proximity to existing transmission infrastructure make this area a prime location. Further, the Port of Hampton Roads offers the deep water and lack of maritime impediments necessary for the production and shipping of wind turbines.

We are pleased that Secretary Salazar included Virginia in his designation of offshore wind farm areas. And we applaud the decision to substantially shorten the permitting process in a way that will allow project developers to attract the investment necessary to support offshore wind projects. Virginia stands ready to compete for the dollars the Department of Energy plans to invest in research and technology development needed to reduce the cost of offshore wind power. Unfortunately, the high cost of offshore wind energy is currently one of the major barriers to utility scale development of this resource in this country. However, those costs can be reduced with next generation technologies and supply chain efficiencies.

The Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority, created by General Assembly legislation last year, is perfectly equipped and positioned to develop proposals that will make the most of Virginia’s extensive and unique offshore wind assets.
Read more:
http://www.evwind.es/noticias.php?id_not=10638

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Full court press in ’12 (Uranium Mining in VA)




Written by Paula I. Bryant
08:56 am 03/09/11

Last month’s remarks to investors by Virginia Uranium Inc. Executive Vice President Walter Coles Jr. that Virginia is “fairly pro-nuclear,” says a mouthful. In the 2012 General Assembly session you can look for the uranium company to pour thousands of dollars into a full court press pushing legislation to legalize uranium mining.

With sponsors chomping at the bit, it’s a sure bet that Virginia Uranium isn’t going to waste time waiting on scientific and safety findings to be determined by an impact study commissioned by the state, and due to be finalized in December paid for by Virginia Uranium.

Pittsylvania County is has uranium deposit.

Walter Coles Sr., who owns the land and a majority of the ore, formed Virginia Uranium Inc. to explore the possibility of eventually mining the massive deposit, which is worth an estimated $10 billion.

Coles Hill, which is the name of Coles’ family’s historic home, is between the Sonans and Sheva communities, about six miles northeast of Chatham.

Virginia has had a moratorium on uranium mining since 1982, and now in seeking to lift the moratorium

Virginia Uranium and uranium mining proponents paint an attractive picture of how this deposit can help satisfy the nation’s desire for energy independence, not to mention the jobs and investments a mine would bring to this economically depressed area of the state.

Opponents, on the other hand, point to the wet climate when they question whether uranium can be mined safely without causing irreparable environmental damage.

In this vein, Halifax County resident Elizabeth M. McGurty recently created a website at

www.banumva.org

 which includes a petition to continue the ban on uranium mining in Virginia.

She welcomes visitors to view her site and sign the petition.

Read more:
http://www.gazettevirginian.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2710:full-court-press-in-12&catid=39:paula-bryant&Itemid=72

Going Green While Pregnant: Ways to Help Your Baby &the Earth

by admin on August 23, 2010

As an expectant mom, you probably want to do everything you can to give your baby the best start possible. That means following your doctor’s orders, staying healthy, and avoiding hazards that can harm your unborn baby.

But did you know that going green during pregnancy (and beyond) is another great way to support the health of your child?

Beauty and Skincare: Pregnancy is a great time to reassess the chemicals that are present in your beauty and skincare routine:

  • Avoid hair dyes: Hair dyes can contain harmful chemicals, so wait until you’re no longer pregnant
  • Use coconut milk for moisturization
  • Read the label: Check out the labels of personal care products to find parabens and phthalates.
  • Use olive oil: Olive oil can be used for moisturizer and deep conditioning your hair.
  • Buy lead-free lipstick
  • Try highlights or lowlights: Highlights and lowlights are safer than a full dye job because they don’t touch your scalp.
  • Go fragrance-free: Fragrance-free products may lessen your exposure to phthalates.
  • Don’t tan: Inhaling particles of spray in sunless tanning can be harmful, and tanning in a bed or in the sun can dangerously elevate your body temperature.
  • Use caution with foreign chemicals
  • Look for safe cosmetics
  • Wait until the second trimester for dyes: Hair dying during the second and third trimesters is safer than the first.
  • Look for an all-natural stretch mark solution
Food:Follow these tips to ensure that the food you’re eating is healthy and sustainable for your baby and the Earth:

  • Eat locally produced food: Find food that’s fresh and local for a greener diet.
  • Use iodized salt: Iodine can help buffer against chemicals in pregnancy.
  • Don’t microwave food in plastic
  • Filter your tap water: Instead of buying filtered water, use a refillable bottle and a filter.
  • Go without added hormones: Milk and meats should be produced without added growth hormones.
  • Buy produce in season
  • Make your own meals: Cook fresh and limit packaged foods when you’re making your own meals.
  • organic: Look for organic produce, especially for thin-skinned fruits and vegetables that easily absorb pesticides.
  • Avoid canned food: Canned food is often found to have BPAs, a toxic chemical.
  • Don’t eat for two: You don’t really need to eat for two
  • Store food in glass
  • Eat fresh, whole foods: Stick to eating food in as natural a state as possible.
  • Drink organic decaf coffee
  • Choose fruits and vegetables wisely: If you can’t always go organic, choose fruits and vegetables that you can peel.
  • Use safe cookware: Teflon and other nonstick cookware often emits toxic chemicals at high temperatures.
  • Make your own baby food: You can make baby food ahead of time and freeze it in portions.
  • Drink water: Drink water instead of other types of beverages.
  • Stay away from processed foods
  • Cook with stainless steel: Cookware like stainless steel, iron, or copper coated pots and pans are safer than others.
  • Seek out sustainable fish: Sustainable, low mercury fish offers excellent nutritional value.
Health:Improve your own health as well as your baby’s and the Earth’s by following these tips:
  • Go lead-free in calcium: Get your calcium in a lead-free supplement.
  • Keep yourself healthy: Your health is important when you’re pregnant, so stay fit, keep a healthy weight, and watch your blood pressure.
  • Try prenatal yoga: De-stress and exercise with prenatal yoga.
  • Don’t give up your vegetarian diet

Read more:
http://www.medicalcodingcertification.com/blog/2010/100-ways-to-help-your-baby-the-earth/

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

NAS Uranium Mining Meeting: CO


Meeting Information

Project Title: Uranium Mining in Virginia
PIN: DELS-BESR-09-06
Major Unit: Division on Earth and Life Studies
Sub Unit: Board on Earth Sciences & Resources
Water Science and Technology Board
RSO: Feary, David
Subject/Focus Area: Earth Sciences

Uranium Mining in Virginia
March 23, 2011 - March 25, 2011
Boulder, CO

If you would like to attend the sessions of this meeting that are open to the public or need more information please contact: Contact Name: Courtney Gibbs
Email: cgibbs@nas.edu
Phone: 202-334-2744
Fax: 202-334-1377

Agenda: Working Tentative Agenda

Meeting of the COMMITTEE ON URANIUM MINING IN VIRGINIA
Board on Earth Sciences and Resources
Division on Earth and Life Studies
National Research Council of the National Academies

March 23-25, 2011
St. Julien Hotel
900 Walnut Street
Boulder, CO 80302
Phone: 720-406-9696 | 1-877-303-0900

Registration for Open Session Requested
Contact Courtney Gibbs at cgibbs@nas.edu
or 202-334-2743

Day 1: Wednesday March 23, 2011 Xanadu Ballroom

CLOSED SESSION – 8:00 am- 10:00 am – COMMITTEE AND STAFF ONLY
10:00 am -2:30 pm OPEN SESSION – Registration Requested - Xanadu Ballroom

Welcome and Introductions Paul Locke

10: 15 Hugh Miller, Colorado School of Mines
11:15 Kimberly Morrison, consulting engineer with experience in mine tailings
12:00 pm Tom Johnson, Colorado State University
12:45 pm Lunch
1:30 Jon Samet, USC Institute for Global Health (via Conference Call)
2:15 TBD, Department of Public Health and the Environment, invited

3:00 Paul Robinson – Southwest Research and Information Center, invited

CLOSED SESSION – 3:45 pm- 8:30 pm – COMMITTEE AND STAFF ONLY

Day 2: Thursday March 24, 2011
8:30 am-6:00 pm ALL DAY CLOSED SESSION [Committee and Staff Only]
Day 3: Friday March 25, 2011
8:30 am-1:00 pm ALL DAY CLOSED SESSION [Committee and Staff Only]
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/meetingview.aspx?MeetingID=4785&MeetingNo=5

Don't sell out to uranium mining



Wednesday, March 9, 2011 9:30 AM EST

Regarding the proposed lifting of the moratorium of uranium mining in Virginia and the consequential mining and milling that will begin at Coles Hill if that happens, I wonder.

As I follow the progression of our neighbor's response to this news (Halifax, Virginia Beach, Floyd, Orange), I am humiliated.

These neighbors are obviously people who are not willing to sacrifice their health or the beauty of the birthplace of this country to become "the energy capital of the world"/dead zone.

Because we are locally "economically challenged" right now, we are suddenly ready to sell our souls?

Uranium mining is short-term gain, long-term responsibility/debt/payoff, for us, as well as our friends.

If the moratorium is lifted, what guarantee does Virginia Uranium Inc. give us in terms of our economy?

There are no guarantees - only risk vs loss.

Will that be a Canadian company's "bottom line" or yours?

There are so many new opportunities arising in this area that will not be hazardous to your health as the tobacco label puts it. (Remember, that's the one that put us all out of business in the first place).

We are repeating the same mistake.

The rest of Virginia is noticing, and taking a stand.

Let's not embarrass ourselves by selling out.

Linda Worsley
Chatham, VA

Read more:
http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2011/03/10/altavista/opinion/opinion02.txt

Wind, Solar Investments Supporting Nearly 60,000 Jobs




03/04/2011
SustainableBusiness.com News

As the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics releases monthly unemployment statistics today, Environment America released an estimate of the clean energy jobs supported in the solar and wind industries last year by a federal renewable energy grant program.

The program’s investment in wind and solar, which is a small portion of the total investment in these projects, supported an estimated 59,000 jobs nationwide.1 The program was set to expire at the end of 2010, but a campaign waged by Environment America and other clean energy advocates helped to get it extended last December.

“America’s potential to generate clean, renewable energy is as limitless as the power of the sun. Clean energy investments are helping Americans to harness that potential to create good, green jobs in a great time of need,” said Sean Garren, Clean Energy Advocate of Environment America.
Hundreds of projects have received grants through the program and are returning tremendous benefits, including:

• A 150 wind turbine project in Livingston County, Illinois, which will contribute as much as $3.5 million to the local tax base and pay around $1.2 million to local landowners in leases. During its year and half long construction, the project employed an average of 180 workers. While supporting the local economy and creating clean energy jobs, this project will generate enough energy to power more than 70,000 typical homes.

• A major expansion of the Posty Cards manufacturing facility in Kansas City, MO was supported with a grant through the program for their 198 solar panels. The company is seeking LEED Platinum certification for their facility, and is projected to expand their employment by 58% in the next five years.

“At a time when many companies and whole sectors were slowing down, this federal investment program really helped the renewable energy industries to come off the bench to deliver a slam dunk for our economy and our environment,” said Garren.

1.Calculated using total reported grants from the Treasury Department and job statistics from Heintz, Pollin, Garrett-Peltier, "How Infrastructure Investments Support the U.S. Economy, January, 2009." Available at the link below (pdf).

Website: www.americanmanufacturing.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/peri_aam_finaljan16_new.pdf
http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/21988

Monday, March 21, 2011

How Does Eating Locally Grown Food Help the Environment?



Locally Grown Food Uses Less Fuel to Deliver Better Health and More Flavor
From Earth Talk

Dear EarthTalk: Why do environmentalists advocate that people “eat locally?” I don’t understand the connection between patronizing local food producers and environmental quality.
-- TD, Burlington, VT

In our modern age of food preservatives and additives, genetically altered crops and E. coli outbreaks, as with the recent spinach debacle [September 2006], people are increasingly concerned about the quality and cleanliness of the foods they eat.

Given the impossibility of identifying the pesticides used and the route taken to grow and transport, say, a banana from Central America to our local supermarket, foods grown locally make a lot of sense for those who want more control over what they put into their bodies.

Locally Grown Food Tastes Better

John Ikerd, a retired agricultural economics professor who writes about the growing “eat local” movement, says that farmers who sell direct to local consumers need not give priority to packing, shipping and shelf-life issues and can instead “select, grow and harvest crops to ensure peak qualities of freshness, nutrition and taste.”

Eat Locally Grown Food for Better Health

“Local food is often safer, too,” says the Center for a New American Dream (CNAD). “Even when it’s not organic, small farms tend to be less aggressive than large factory farms about dousing their wares with chemicals.”
Eat Locally Grown Food to Reduce Global Warming

Eating locally grown food even helps in the fight against global warming. Rich Pirog of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture reports that the average fresh food item on our dinner table travels 1,500 miles to get there. Buying locally produced food eliminates the need for all that fuel-guzzling transportation.

Eat Locally Grown Food to Help the Economy

Another benefit of eating locally is helping the local economy. Farmers on average receive only 20 cents of each food dollar spent, says Ikerd, the rest going for transportation, processing, packaging, refrigeration and marketing. Farmers who sell food to local customers “receive the full retail value, a dollar for each food dollar spent,” he says. Additionally, eating locally encourages the use of local farmland for farming, thus keeping development in check while preserving open space.

Take the Eat Local Challenge

Portland, Oregon’s EcoTrust has launched a campaign, the Eat Local Challenge, to encourage people to eat locally for a week so they can see—and taste—the benefits. The organization provides an “Eat Local Scorecard” to those willing to try. Participants must commit to spending 10 percent of their grocery budget on local foods grown within a 100-mile radius of home. In addition, they are asked to try one new fruit or vegetable each day, and to freeze or otherwise preserve some food to enjoy later in the year.

How to Find Locally Grown Food Near You

Shopping regularly at local farmers’ markets or farm stands tops the list. Also, locally owned grocery and natural foods stores and coops are much more likely than supermarkets to stock local foods. The Local Harvest website provides a comprehensive national directory of farmers’ markets, farm stands and other sources of locally grown food.

Read more:
http://environment.about.com/od/greenlivingdesign/a/locally_grown.htm?nl=1

Sunday, March 20, 2011

NAS Uranium Mining Virginia Study Meeting: Boulder, CO




Meeting Information

Project Title: Uranium Mining in Virginia
PIN: DELS-BESR-09-06
Major Unit: Division on Earth and Life Studies

Sub Unit: Board on Earth Sciences & Resources Water Science and Technology Board
RSO: Feary, David
Subject/Focus Area: Earth Sciences


Uranium Mining in Virginia
March 23, 2011 - March 25, 2011
Boulder, CO

If you would like to attend the sessions of this meeting that are open to the public or need more information please contact: Contact Name: Courtney Gibbs, Email: cgibbs@nas.edu
Phone: 202-334-2744, Fax: 202-334-1377

Agenda: Working Tentative Agenda

Meeting of the COMMITTEE ON URANIUM MINING IN VIRGINIA
Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies

March 23-25, 2011
St. Julien Hotel
900 Walnut Street
Boulder, CO 80302
Phone: 720-406-9696 | 1-877-303-0900

Registration for Open Session Requested  Contact Courtney Gibbs at cgibbs@nas.edu,  or 202-334-2743

Day 1: Wednesday March 23, 2011 Xanadu Ballroom

CLOSED SESSION – 8:00 am- 10:00 am – COMMITTEE AND STAFF ONLY
10:00 am -2:30 pm OPEN SESSION – Registration Requested - Xanadu Ballroom
Welcome and Introductions Paul Locke
10: 15 Hugh Miller, Colorado School of Mines
11:15 Kimberly Morrison, consulting engineer with experience in mine tailings
12:00 pm Tom Johnson, Colorado State University
12:45 pm Lunch
1:30 Jon Samet, USC Institute for Global Health (via Conference Call)
2:15 TBD, Department of Public Health and the Environment, invited

3:00 Paul Robinson – Southwest Research and Information Center, invited

CLOSED SESSION – 3:45 pm- 8:30 pm – COMMITTEE AND STAFF ONLY

Day 2: Thursday March 24, 2011
8:30 am-6:00 pm ALL DAY CLOSED SESSION [Committee and Staff Only]
Day 3: Friday March 25, 2011
8:30 am-1:00 pm ALL DAY CLOSED SESSION [Committee and Staff Only]
















Saturday, March 19, 2011

Group Seeks To Prevent Construction of New Uranium Mill in Colorado



March 11, 2011 /24-7

PressRelease

The dangers of uranium mining and milling are well-documented.

Those who have worked in mines or have lived near mines frequently suffer from a wide range of radiation-related ailments, including cancer, birth defects and kidney disease.

In 1990, the federal government passed a law specifically providing financial compensation for some people who have developed illnesses as a result of uranium mining and milling, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). No new uranium mills have opened in the United States in 25 years.

Given this background, one might reasonably be surprised to learn that earlier this year, Colorado's Department of Public Health and Environment approved a permit for the creation of a new uranium mill. The proposed Pinon Ridge Uranium Mill would be located in the southwestern part of the state, near the small town of Naturita. The company responsible for the mill, Energy Fuels, expects that that the mill could be running as soon as the first half of next year.

One environmental group, Sheep Mountain Alliance, has filed a lawsuit to prevent the mill from further development.

The organization alleges that state regulators failed to follow appropriate procedures before approving the permit, and that the state has not required the company to allocate sufficient funds for cleaning up contamination. Environmental groups have expressed general concerns that the nearby Colorado and Dolores rivers may be contaminated by radioactive material from the mill.

Additionally, the lawsuit claims that proposed mill would violate a Colorado law forbidding the creation of new uranium mills in places where high levels of heavy metals are already present.

Article provided by Killian & Davis PC
Visit us at http://www.killianlaw.com/

Read more:
http://uspolitics.einnews.com/247pr/201237

Time for mining foes to mobilize


By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: March 16, 2011

To the editor:

Virginia Uranium Inc., Virginia legislators, local elected officials and area business leaders have been telling John Q. Public to “wait for the study” by the National Academy of Sciences to see whether or not uranium mining can be done safely. It has been stated on numerous occasions that the NAS study WILL NOT determine whether or not mining can be done safely in Virginia.

So, for what exactly are we waiting?

While John Q. Public obediently continues to “wait for the study,” VUI is wining and dining Virginia’s legislators, flying them to France and Canada to see “reclaimed” uranium mines and making generous political contributions. They’re lobbying legislators to lift the uranium mining ban and pass favorable regulations in the 2012 session of the General Assembly.

According to a recent Associated Press news article by Steve Szkotak, VUI has successfully pocketed some legislators. Their pockets are deep and appear to be filling quickly. Walter Coles Jr. says said Virginia Uranium has lined up sponsors of the legislation to lift the ban.

Who are these legislators?

This illustrates how little meaning the NAS study has to legislators. They don’t care about the results. It’s becoming evident that the NAS study, initiated by the Coal and Energy Commission and paid for by VUI is merely a diversion so VUI can buy legislators while urging you to “wait for the study.”

VUI is ramming this study through and is pushing for a vote before the NAS or other reports can be adequately reviewed. According to contract, the NAS study will conclude on Dec. 15, 2011. The General Assembly convenes on Jan. 11, 2012. How many legislators can pull off work, family and holiday obligations plus read, digest, formulate questions and receive answers regarding a document of purported importance such as the NAS document in that short amount of time? None.

What are you waiting for, John Q.? No one else is.

KAREN B. MAUTE

Mount Cross

http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2011/mar/16/time-mining-foes-mobilize-ar-907977/


Thursday, March 17, 2011

Groups seek to broaden Va. Uranium mining study

4 hours ago

(AP:DANVILLE, Va.) Groups opposed to tapping a rich uranium deposit in Southside Virginia want members of a National Academy of Sciences study committee to consider the catastrophic events in Japan as they weigh the consequences of uranium mining in the state.

The committee is in the middle of a study assessing various aspects of uranium mining and its conclusions are likely to be critical to the General Assembly's deliberations over whether a 29-year ban on uranium mining should be lifted, which could clear the way to opening a 119-million-pound deposit in Pittsylvania County. The committee's findings, due by year's end, will not include a recommendation on whether the moratorium should end.

In their filing with the NAS, the five groups said committee members should examine the potential that the nuclear power crisis in Japan after an earthquake and a tsunami will ultimately depress global uranium prices, potentially making the Coles Hill site unsustainable after mining has begun.

"Who deals with the situation if the uranium company starts mining and milling, becomes unprofitable, and abandons the site?" Deborah Lovelace, president of League of Individuals for the Environment Inc., wrote in a joint statement. "What will happen to our farming and water while waiting for a clean-up? Who pays for the contamination?"

The other groups seeking the Japan-inspired reviews are the Roanoke River Basin Association, Dan River Basin Association, Southside Concerned Citizens Inc. and the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League.

Jennifer Walsh, a spokesman for the NAS, said Thursday the board's governing body and staff can expand the scope of a study to consider relevant developments. She said the decision is on a case-to-case basis, and declined to speculate if the devastation in Japan would be deemed relevant to the Virginia study.

A description of the study's scope includes a review of global and national uranium market trends.

In Japan Thursday, emergency workers attempted to regain control of Japan's dangerously overheated nuclear complex to cool nuclear fuel rods at risk of spraying out more radiation. They used police water cannons, heavy-duty fire trucks and military helicopters dropping bucket after enormous bucket of water onto the stricken system.

The groups also asked the NAS panel to examine whether current federal laws are sufficient to safely monitor uranium milling and storage of waste products from the mining.

"The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's regulations of conventional uranium mills are antiquated and NRC has not had a single application for a conventional mill license for almost 25 years until very recently," wrote Andrew Lester of the Roanoke River Basin Association.

Read more:
http://news.ino.com/headlines/?newsid=6897717771792

Uranium mining industry has changed little in 30 years



Wednesday, March 9, 2011 9:30 AM EST

I would like to thank Dr. Randy Randol for his letter to the editor, which I read in the Chatham Star-Tribune this past Wednesday, March 2.

You stated in that letter that, "...It made little sense to ban uranium mining in Virginia 30 years ago."
Having studied this issue for several years, I have concluded that the Virginia General Assembly had the best interests of the voting Virginians at heart in adopting this moratorium in 1982.

This decision arose from scientific investigation and the discovery of how much damage had already been caused by mining uranium in localities far more remote and with far less annual rainfall than is currently the case here in Pittsylvania County.

Before making a statement like the one you made in last week's Chatham paper, you might do well to realize that those legislators were actually trying to protect us by banning activities that would render us, here and living within and around the "sacrifice zone," helpless in our defense of our lives and livelihood, and the health of us all.

If you do the research you will see that nothing has changed within the uranium mining industry since the ban was enacted in 1982.

One of the reasons that these Canadian mining companies are coming here to Piedmont Virginia is that the Canadian government has closed down all uranium mining activity (with the exception of Saskatchewan) because of the filth and associated health problems that still surround the mining phase of the nuclear cycle.

This flies in the face of your statement that "over the last 30 years we have made significant advances in the technology of uranium mining."

I would suggest that you Google Uravan, Colorado, for a good look at the devastation resulting from mining uranium.

And why mention that 119 million pounds of uranium would last us here in Virginia for 75 years?

That is at present capacity, and taking the false position that we here in Virginia would ever have even one light bulb that was lit using the lode at Coles Hill.

Walter Coles himself has stated that his yellow cake would be sold to the highest bidder.

It will be sold on the open commodities markets and no one will ever know, really, who buys it.

Neither will this mother-lode of uranium be worth anything as a tax revenue for Virginia.

We have a law here which allows corporations to not pay a state income tax on anything produced in Virginia that is then sold out of state.

See Imperial Coal Co .vs. State of Virginia in 1934 to learn of this advantage on state corporate income taxes.

In closing, I might add that the leading candidate for being a national high level radioactive waste dump, according to Obama's Blue Ribbon Commission on Radioactive Waste Disposal, seems to be the granite formations of the Appalachian Mountain chain.

That ought to bring it to a lot more backyards. Maybe even yours, Dr. Randol.

Hunter Austin
Hurt, VA

Read more:
http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2011/03/10/chatham/opinion/opinion13.txt

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

The track record of a dirty industry (Uranium Mining)



By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: March 10, 2011

To the editor:

In response to recent letters in support of uranium mining, here are some of the scare tactics and junk pseudoscience from the (new) 50 years of mining industry changes, thanks to wise-uranium.org, The Nuclear Information and Resource Service:

» In Saskatchewan, Canada, environmental monitoring revealed a sharp increase of uranium loads in lake sediments near the Rabbitt Lake mine in the years 2007-08, similar to the increase in 2002-03. The 2009 data showed some decrease, but the uranium loads remained above the probable effects level.

» In Wyoming, Cameco Resources paid a $13,000 fine for failure to report an excursion at its Highland in situ leach mine. At the idle Christensen Ranch in situ leach mine in Wyoming, the NRC requested further groundwater cleanup efforts at inadequately restored mine sections.

» In Colorado, Cotter Corp.’s currently closed Schwartzwalder uranium mine was found to contaminate groundwater near a Denver water reservoir. Cotter Corp. defied state orders to clean up the contaminated mine water and even sued the state over the cleanup order.

The state imposed a $55,000 penalty, which was later increased by an additional $39,000.

Mining regulators also ordered Cotter Corp. to address heaps of toxic uranium ore at the mine site. Cotter Corp. moreover announced to willfully neglect the EPA requirement to conduct radon measurements at its Canon City uranium mill tailings impoundment in Colorado.

What I see is an intensive campaign from mining supporters trying to sell pure hogwash to people on how clean the dirty uranium industry is. Regrettably, those supporters have closely followed the wrong side of uranium mining and milling.

Most of the people of Pittsylvania County live in rural areas and they don’t have a public water supply. Virginia Beach knows what is at stake here over water that is why a statewide study on drinking water must go forward.

In Brazil, wells near the Caetite uranium mine were closed for excess radiation levels. In South Africa, a burst of the Cooke gold/uranium tailings dam on Dec. 18, 2010, sent toxic mud into the Wonderfonteinspruit River — and the list goes on.

On Dec. 17, a dam failure of a retention basin spilled 200 cubic meters of uranium-containing liquids at Areva’s Arlit open pit mine in Niger.

We buy uranium overseas because it is cheaper and we have a mega-ton to mega watts program with Russia to turn nuclear warheads into uranium that is usable in our nuclear power plants. On March 4, the Department of Energy announced it is again selling stockpiles of excess uranium.

PHILLIP LOVELACE
Gretna, VA

Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2011/mar/10/track-record-dirty-industry-ar-894547/

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Roanoke River Basin Association opposes company's uranium mining plan

Roanoke River Basin


By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: March 13, 2011

RICHMOND —The Danville-based Roanoke River Basin Association passed a resolution Saturday opposing the ban's lifting, citing a study that concluded mining operations could harm local water supplies.

Virginia Uranium Inc. proposes to mine the deposit in Pittsylvania County, near the North Carolina border, and estimates its value at $7 billion to $10 billion. The mine is located in the center of the Roanoke River Basin.

About 350,000 North Carolina residents rely on the basin as their water supply, said Roanoke River Basin board member Greg Godard.

The region already supplies 65 million gallons a day to Virginia Beach.

Godard cited a study by the city of Virginia Beach that showed the mine could temporarily contaminate the city's water supply if a hurricane or tropical storm causes massive flooding.

The study found that Kerr Reservoir upstream of Lake Gaston would trap up to 90 percent of radioactive waste. But the remaining contaminants could enter the lake and that it could take up to two years to completely flush radioactive contaminants downstream.

The General Assembly would have to end the moratorium for mining to begin. The company has said it would push for legislation in 2012.

"If the ban is lifted, the Basin will be affected more than any other potential uranium mining sites in Virginia," said Gene Addesso, the Roanoke River Basin Association's vice president.

Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2011/mar/13/group-opposes-companys-uranium-mining-plan-ar-903118/


Monday, March 14, 2011

They're all ready to go right now

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: March 13, 2011

No one should be surprised by the recent Associated Press story about Virginia Uranium Inc. Executive Vice President Walter Coles Jr. telling potential investors that Virginia is “fairly pro-nuclear.”

The predominant local opinion about VUI’s quest to mine and mill a 119-million pound uranium deposit appears to be “Let’s wait for the study.”

But VUI has no such qualms.

“In January of 2012, we will have a bill in the state legislature that directs the Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy to develop the regulations for uranium mining,” Coles told investors in a webcast, The Associated Press reported.

Wait for the study?

At Virginia Uranium, they already believe that uranium can be mined safely in Pittsylvania County and that the mine and mill.

To get Virginia to overturn its 1982 moratorium on uranium mining, Virginia Uranium has made $55,150 in campaign contributions to General Assembly members — 58 percent to Republicans and 41 percent to Democrats, according to the Virginia Public Access Project.

VUI spent nearly $30,000 to fly Del. Onzlee Ware, D-Roanoke ($9,589), Sen. Frank W. Wagner, R-Virginia Beach ($8,502) and Sen. John C Watkins, R-Midlothian ($9,327) to France to see where uranium has been mined.

Since 2007, VUI has spent $267,146 on lobbyists. How many registered lobbyists do you have in Richmond? Virginia Uranium Inc. has 15 working the 140-member Virginia General Assembly, according to VPAP.

The point of all this, of course, is that Virginia Uranium Inc. has a plan, a timetable and a goal.

We’ve said this before, but it bears repeating: The standard for allowing uranium mining and milling at Coles Hill must be no harm to our air, water and land.

It’s up to VUI to prove their project is safe, not that it’s safe under certain conditions or it can be safe if certain rules are always followed or it might be safe. It has to be safe as we, the people, understand that word.

The National Academy of Sciences study that so many local people have put their faith in will be out for just a month or two before the 2012 General Assembly session begins. How much time will we really have to weigh results of “the study” before a decision is made for us?

Not long at all, folks.

VUI is a business that wants to get down to the business of mining that uranium ore; good for them. But as it stands right now, we’re not going to have enough time to ask questions about the results of the four uranium-related studies being done.

The bottom line is Virginia Uranium is ready to move forward, even if we’re not. That’s a mistake on their part, but it tells us what kind of project — and company — we’re dealing with.

Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2011/mar/13/theyre-all-ready-go-right-now-ar-900085/?sc_cid=GDR-NEWS-Afternoon

Census: Near-record level of US counties dying



Comment: Mining counties die after the mining companies pull out and become welfare counties, this is what happens when you depend on 1 industry and are not diversified.

Feb 22, 5:22 PM EST
By HOPE YEN and JOHN RABY
Associated Press


WELCH, W.Va. (AP) -- In America's once-thriving coal country, 87-year-old Ed Shepard laments a prosperous era gone by, when shoppers lined the streets and government lent a helping hand. Now, here as in one-fourth of all U.S. counties, West Virginia's graying residents are slowly dying off.

Hit by an aging population and a poor economy, a near-record number of U.S. counties are experiencing more deaths than births in their communities, a phenomenon demographers call "natural decrease."

In all, roughly 760 of the nation's 3,142 counties are fading away, stretching from industrial areas near Pittsburgh and Cleveland to the vineyards outside San Francisco to the rural areas of east Texas and the Great Plains. Once-booming housing areas, such as retirement communities in Florida, have not been immune.

West Virginia was the first to experience natural decrease statewide over the last decade, with Maine, Pennsylvania and Vermont close to following suit, according to the latest census figures. As a nation, the U.S. population grew by just 9.7 percent since 2000, the lowest decennial rate since the Great Depression.

"Natural decrease is an important but not widely appreciated demographic phenomenon that is reshaping our communities in both rural and urban cores of large metro areas," said Kenneth Johnson, a sociology professor and demographer at the University of New Hampshire's Carsey Institute who analyzed the census numbers.

Johnson said common threads among the dying counties are older whites who are no longer having children, and an exodus of young adults who find little promise in the region and seek jobs elsewhere. The places also have fewer Hispanic immigrants, who on average are younger and tend to have more children than other groups.

"The downturn in the U.S. economy is only exacerbating the problem," said Johnson, whose research paper is being published next month in the journal Rural Sociology. "In some cases, the only thing that can pull an area out is an influx of young Hispanic immigrants or new economic development."

---

The predicament is starkest in places like Welch. In the 1960s, McDowell County ranked tops in the U.S. in coal production. Even as it began to stumble, President John F. Kennedy took notice and pushed federal aid to the region. McDowell residents were the first to get federal food stamps when they were rolled out in the Kennedy administration.

After U.S. Steel sold the last of its mining operations by 2003, folks in southern West Virginia began counting on new highway projects to prop up the long-struggling area.

"One of the promises we're waiting to come is the highway," said Carolyn Falin, an assistant schools superintendent in McDowell County.

From the east, the Coalfields Expressway would bypass the many two-lane, truck-clogged roads zigzagging through the mountainous region. It would link a freeway to the Virginia state line 65 miles to the southwest. So far, only a few miles are open. Design work on most of it hasn't been finished.

From the west, a 95-mile King Coal Highway is also envisioned, with some bridge work and a few miles now under construction.

Shepard, who walks to work from a nearby apartment, watched the county's population plummet 80 percent after U.S. Steel's exit. Even with the recent opening of a federal prison, Shepard bemoans the area's decline, including the end of "20 years of the best fishing you ever saw."

Nowadays, he says, "you can fish but you won't catch any trout. It's like the coal mines. It's all gone."

Recently the U.S. Senate rejected a $900,000 appropriation for a proposed interchange of the King Coal Highway and the Coalfields Expressway near Welch.

---

Dying counties in the U.S. were rare until the 1960s, when the baby boom ended. By 1973, as farming communities declined, roughly 515 counties - mostly in the Great Plains - reported natural decrease. The phenomenon then began to show up in industrial regions, such as upstate New York and California. Natural decrease peaked in 2002 at a record 985, or 1 in 3 counties, before increasing births and an influx of Hispanic immigration helped add to county populations during the housing boom.

Following the recent recession, birth rates have dropped to the lowest in a century. Preliminary census numbers for 2007-09 now show that the number of dying counties is back on the upswing. Recent additions include Pittsburgh and its surrounding counties.

James Follain, senior fellow and economist at the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the University of Albany, said a new kind of declining city may be emerging in the wake of the housing bust - metropolitan areas that rapidly overbuilt earlier in the decade and then suffered massive foreclosures.

He cited as examples Las Vegas, Miami, parts of Arizona, and Stockton, Modesto, Fresno and Riverside in California. Like traditional ghost towns, Follain says, portions of these areas could spiral down from persistent loss of jobs and population and lose their reason for being.

Follain also pointed to a tighter fiscal environment in Washington that will limit help to troubled areas.

The Obama administration announced this month it would shrink the government's role in the mortgage system to reduce taxpayer exposure to risk. House Republicans also are pushing federal spending cuts of more than $61 billion, even if it means reducing jobs.

"It's going to be a very slow recovery," Follain said.
---
Not all U.S. areas are declining. Most places with the fastest growth since 2000 were able to retain or attract college graduates and young professionals who came for jobs and later started families.

Metro areas with diversified economies such as Austin, Texas, Raleigh, N.C., and Portland, Ore., all saw gains in college graduates; other places seeing gains or reduced losses in young adults, such as Washington, D.C., Boston and San Francisco, have burgeoning biotech industries.

In West Virginia, more than 40 of its 55 counties had natural decrease over the past decade. Yet the state still gained population overall, and averted a loss of a U.S. House of Representatives seat based on the 2010 census.

It wasn't because of a last-minute turnaround. Most of West Virginia's population gains are new residents spilling over into the eastern part of the state from the blossoming Washington-Baltimore metropolitan area. The three counties on the Maryland line - Morgan, Berkeley and Jefferson - each had substantial increases.

It's a different story in West Virginia's northern panhandle, along the edge of Pennsylvania near Pittsburgh.

On a recent afternoon, a group of students mingled during a cigarette break at West Virginia Northern Community College in Wheeling and chatted about their futures. "It's not that bad an area," said Demetrius Paige, 19, but there are "not a lot of jobs." He plans to leave within six years.

Kayla Murphy, 19, of Moundsville wants to stay in the state and become a nurse to help children like her brother, who has celiac disease and diabetes. She says moving out is the only real option for career-oriented people. They include her boyfriend, who left for Wisconsin to teach history.

"You have to," Murphy said. "Working at McDonald's isn't cool."

---

Yen reported from Washington.
Online: Census list of U.S. counties, with births, deaths and natural increase, for 2009:
http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/CO-EST2009-05.html
Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov/
Read more:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CENSUS_DYING_COUNTIES?SITE=VADAR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT


Sunday, March 13, 2011

Northumberland Schools participates in DOE Wind Program



February 14, 2011

On Friday, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) joined with local and state leaders in Heathsville, Virginia to announce the first school in Virginia to participate in DOE's Wind for Schools project. Northumberland Middle and High School is participating in the Wind for Schools project through a $20,000 Recovery Act grant from the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy, funded by DOE's State Energy Program. Friday's ceremony included the installation of a 2.4 kilowatt wind turbine, which will be used as an educational aid while providing the school with clean, renewable energy.

Northumberland Middle and High Schools' involvement in DOE's Wind for Schools project answers President Obama's call to improve and expand science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education nationwide, while encouraging the adoption of clean, renewable energy in communities.

Northumberland Middle and High School will work with nearby Rappahannock Community College and the Chesapeake Bay Governor's School in order to broaden the reach of the Wind for Schools projects in the state. Students from all three schools will be able to access data generated by the wind turbine. This will provide an opportunity for students to apply math and science concepts to practical applications and will help increase STEM literacy so that all students can learn and think critically in science, math, engineering, and technology. These classroom opportunities will also help prepare students to be leaders in America's clean energy future.

The Wind for Schools project is funded through the Department of Energy Wind and Water Power Program's Wind Powering America initiative. Wind Powering America promotes the responsible deployment of wind energy in the United States by building networks of experts and interested parties, engaging communities, and providing impartial technical information.

Read more:
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/progress_alerts.cfm/pa_id=482

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Versar JV completes solar power project in Virginia



EBR Staff Writer Published 22 February 2011

Project management company Versar said that its joint venture (JV) with Johnson Controls Federal Systems has completed a solar power project in Richmond in the US state of Virginia.

Versar designed and installed a 115kW DC photovoltaic roof system that includes 500 solar panels.

The company claims that the solar project at the Spottswood W Robinson III and Robert R Merhige Jr United States Courthouse in Richmond will help the courthouse reduce its fossil-fuel energy consumption and CO2 emissions.

The Versar Johnson Controls JV was awarded this project by the US General Services Administration.

http://solar.energy-business-review.com/news/versar-jv-completes-solar-power-project-in-virginia-220211

Friday, March 11, 2011

US uranium sale to fund site cleanup


03 March 2011

The US Department of Energy (DoE) will sell off excess uranium over the next three years to help fund the cleanup of a former enrichment site but has determined this will not adversely affect uranium markets.

Now, energy secretary Stephen Chu has announced there would be no adverse impact on domestic uranium industries from a proposed transfer of 450 tonnes of uranium (tU) per quarter, starting this year.

This determination was based on an Energy Resources International (ERI) analysis and takes into account other sales or transfers into the market of DoE uranium, including low enriched uranium from the downblending of weapons material under the DoE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Including the NNSA's scheduled transfers, the DoE would be transferring approximately 2000 tU per year over the three years involved, 2011-2013.

The transfers could result in an average $4.45 per pound decrease in spot market prices over the three years to 2013 and a $1.24 reduction in long-term prices, ERI has found.

This compares to current spot market prices of around $69 per pound quoted by UX Consulting and Tradetech. However, the uranium will be transferred as UF6, so could potentially trigger slight falls in conversion and enrichment prices, although the analysts note that in reality many market participants have already anticipated most of the impacts based upon statements released by the DoE in previous years.

ERI warns that "perceived uncertainty" over potential future DoE involvement in the commercial sphere might have a greater potential impact on the market than the likely effects on prices and the possible displacement of domestic uranium production that could arise from the proposed transfers.

The gaseous diffusion uranium enrichment plant at Portsmouth began operations in the 1950s, enriching uranium for military use, but from the 1960s it produced low enriched uranium for use in civil nuclear power stations alongside the Paducah plant in Kentucky. Enrichment ceased at Portsmouth in May 2001 and operations were consolidated at Paducah, which is still operating. In August 2010 the DoE awarded a $2.1 billion contract to a joint venture of Fluor Corporation and Babcock and Wilcox for decontamination and decommissioning of the vast Portsmouth site.

Read more:
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/ENF-US_uranium_sale_to_fund_site_cleanup-0303117.html.aspx


Thursday, March 10, 2011

The Transparency of Water Bottle Manufacturers



Why companies aren't made to disclose water source information

By LISA CLEARY
Updated 7:00 AM EST, Wed, Mar 2, 2011
A recent report by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) details that, from the 170 bottled waters sold in the U.S., only three provide consumers with information pertaining to water source, purification methods and remaining contaminants. The report further emphasized that Nestlé’s Pure Life Purified Water is the only one of the top 10 domestic brands that readily offers this information.

Why the ambiguity of it all?

EWG Research Analyst Nneka Leiba explained: “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the agency that regulates bottled water, does not require bottle water manufacturers to disclose the geographic source of their products on their labels or on their website.”

Yet, oddly enough, it’s the source of the water that plays a role in contaminant levels, and that’s why activists within EWG are sounding the whistle.

“The source of the water and the degree to which it is or is not purified plays an important role in the contaminant levels. Pollutants may also make their way into bottled water from the plastic bottles in which many of these bottles are packaged,” said Leiba.

Critics of the industry are also pointing fingers at the visual aspect of bottled water packaging, designed by savvy marketing executives to tout the purity of a brand. While the images of misty waterfalls conjure up ideals of natural, virgin waters, companies are failing to clearly substantiate their claims.

“Winds that carry acid rain and pollutants to other parts of the planet just don't come [their] way," Leiba laughed.

Meanwhile, experts are calling for action.

"Water bottlers are clearly having difficulty reading the writing on the wall or else there would already be clearer writing on their labels," said Leslie Samuelrich, Chief of Staff for Corporate Accountability International. State governments are calling for it. Congress is calling for it. The longer the industry avoids transparency, the more it forces the hand of civil servants to advocate the consumer's right to know."

Nowadays, “going green” is an easy, convenient selling point, because Americans are joining the trend of promoting healthier lifestyles and a healthier planet. But to buy a bottle of water, ironically enough, is the antithesis of the whole concept.

“They know they need to aggressively work to image themselves as green, since they’re selling an environmentally destructive product,” Leiba said of bottled water companies. “They are selling a non-sustainable product at over 1,000 times its worth, damaging many ecosystems and angering many communities in the process.”

Want to really go green, water guzzlers?

The EWG urges you to pour a glass of filtered tap water, instead. After all, it points out, almost 50 percent of bottled water is straight from the tap, sometimes purified (and sometimes not).

First Published: Feb 20, 2011 10:24 PM EST

Read more:
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/health/The-Transparency-of-Water-Bottle-Manufacturers--116578518.html

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Ground Water Awareness Week: March 6-12, 2011

Much of the water we use comes from the ground.

Learn more about ground water, the threats to its safety and how to protect your own ground water sources during Ground Water Awareness Week.

Clean water is one of the world's most precious resources. People use water every day for a variety of reasons, such as drinking, bathing, recreation, agriculture, cooling, and industry. Although water plays an essential role in every person's life, many individuals are not aware that much of their water comes from the ground.

National Ground Water Awareness Week, an annual observance sponsored by the National Ground Water Association (NGWA), is March 6–12, 2011. The purpose of this observance is to stress how important ground water is to the health of all people and the environment (1).

Ground Water Contamination

Ground water is water that is located below the surface of the earth in spaces between rock and soil. Ground water supplies water to wells and springs and is a substantial source of water used in the United States. Thirty percent of all available freshwater comes from ground water (2), which supplies a significant amount of water to community water systems and private wells (3).

Protecting ground water sources from contamination is an important priority for countries throughout the world, including the United States. Most of the time, ground water sources in the United States are safe to use and not a cause for worry. However, ground water sources can become contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, and chemicals that can lead to sickness and disease.

Ground water contaminants sometimes occur naturally in the environment (for example, arsenic and radon), but are more often the result of human activities. These activities include incorrect use of fertilizers and pesticides; poorly sited, constructed or maintained septic systems; improper disposal or storage of wastes; and chemical spills at industrial sites (4). From 1971 to 2006, 54% of reported drinking water outbreaks were due to the use of untreated ground water (31%) or ground water treatment deficiencies (23%). The most common pathogens identified in ground water outbreaks during this period included Shigella spp., hepatitis A virus, norovirus, Giardia intestinalis, Campylobacter spp, and Salmonella spp (5).

The presence of pathogens and chemicals in our drinking water can lead to health problems, including gastrointestinal illness, reproductive problems, and neurological disorders (6). Infants, young children, pregnant women, the elderly, and people whose immune systems are compromised because of AIDS, chemotherapy, or transplant medications may be especially susceptible to illness from certain contaminants. Concerns for ground water contaminants have led the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and individual states to develop new regulations to protect ground water in public water systems (the Ground Water Rule).

Is your household in either of these categories?

Are you among the almost 90 million Americans who get their tap water from a community water system that uses ground water?

Seventy-eight percent of public water systems in the United States use ground water as their primary source, supplying drinking water to 30% of community water system users, or almost 90 million Americans (7). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets maximum concentration levels for many water pollutants and regulates drinking water quality in public water systems, including community water systems. You can find out more about your local drinking water quality and possible contaminants by viewing your consumer confidence report (CCR), which every utility company is required to provide to its customers.

For more information on EPA's National Primary Drinking Water Regulations [PDF - 924KB]
For more information on community water systems

Are you among the 16 million American households who have their own private wells?

An estimated 16 million American households get their water from private ground water wells, which are not subject to EPA regulations (8). Private ground water wells can provide safe, clean water. However, well water may be or become contaminated, leading to illness. It is the responsibility of the well owner to maintain their well, in order to ensure their water is safe from harmful contaminants (9). State and local health departments have resources available to help homeowners protect groundwater.

For more information on well maintenance.

Read more:
http://www.cdc.gov/Features/GroundWaterAwareness/?s_cid=tw_cdc382

Uranium Mining threat looms over Lake Gaston, Kerr Dam



Wednesday, March 2, 2011 9:15 AM EST
By Pamela Carpenter

Although Lake Gaston is in no immediate danger from a proposed uranium mining operation in Pittsylvania County, Va., the Virginia General Assembly could receive legislation attempting to lift a moratorium in place for nearly three decades that bans the process as early as January 2012.

Members of the Lake Gaston Water Safety Council heard a presentation last week from Virginia Beach Director of Public Utilities Thomas Leahy pertaining to a study on uranium mining.

"There is interest in mining and milling of uranium ore reserves in Pittsylvania County, upstream of John H. Kerr Reservoir," reads a March 2010 report by Michael Baker, Jr. Engineers presented to Virginia Beach City Council. "Uranium mining and milling produces vast quantities of waste material known as tailings, [which] retain about 85 percent of their original radioactivity for hundreds of thousands of years because of other radioactive materials, such as radium and thorium that are not extracted during the uranium and milling process."

Both radium and thorium are intensely radioactive metallic elements that occur naturally and result as a byproduct of the decay of uranium during and after the mining and milling processes.

The report goes on to note that the containment of tailings in the United States hasn't always been successful in spite of strict regulations.

"Historically, the confinement of tailings has failed at a number of mines in the United States and elsewhere-some as the result of heavy rainfall-resulting in the release of radioactive sediments to downstream surface waters," the report reads.

Virginia Uranium Inc., which owns property in Coles Hill, Va., that contains a deposit of uranium, approached the Virginia General Assembly in 2008 requesting funding for a study on uranium mining and the drafting of regulations for that process. The bill passed the Virginia Senate, but was killed in the House of Delegates. After Virginia refused to fund the study, the mining company paid to have the study completed.

"We are opposed to anything that hurts the water," Leahy said. "Our Council's position is that we are opposed to lifting the moratorium and our recommendation is that they not change their position."

The study results that Leahy presented were a simulation of what could happen in the water supplies in the Kerr Reservoir and subsequently in Lake Gaston in the event of a probable maximum precipitation event (PMP). PMP refers to the theoretical greatest amount of precipitation that is physically possible over a particular drainage area.

"Most uranium mines in the U.S. are located in western locations which are more arid than Virginia," the Baker report reads. "Virginia is subject to tropical storms and hurricanes, some of which have generated extreme flooding east of the Blue Ridge Mountains along a corridor that cuts a path through the uranium ore deposits in Pittsylvania County."

The Baker report notes that two storms occurred in nearby Nelson and Madison counties that resulted in precipitation amounts near the PMP, and two other weather events in Charlotte and Page counties that were similarly significant in terms of rainfall.

Leahy pointed out that the fact that Virginia does get extreme weather creates a very real potential for the contamination of the drinking water supply.

"Our concern is that if there is some type of failure in the containment processes in spite of the regulations and a disaster takes place, could the water supply be contaminated enough to give us a serious water problem," Leahy said. "This study shows that it could happen."

The city of Virginia Beach receives its drinking water via the Gaston Pipeline, meaning that water supplies in the Kerr Reservoir and Lake Gaston provide the residents of that area with their drinking water. Because Lake Gaston receives approximately 93 percent of its inflow from the Kerr Reservoir, whatever toxins end up in the Reservoir will also end up in Lake Gaston.

The study results will be presented to the National Academy of Sciences for review and recommendation late this year.

Pamela Carpenter is a staff writer with the Lake Gaston Gazette-Observer.

Read more:
http://www.vancnews.com/articles/2011/03/02/warrenton/news/news52.txt