Sunday, October 31, 2010
Green Machine: Wind farms make like a fish
17:21 23 September 2010
by Paul Marks
Can the flicking tails of schooling fish help squeeze more power out of a wind farm? A group of aeronautical engineers seem to think so.
Inspired by the turbulence created by fish schools, they are now testing whether it's possible to position wind turbines so that they help each other – and so boost a farm's energy output.
Wind farm turbines tend to fall into two types. Three-bladed, horizontal-axis wind turbines are more common – the world's biggest HAWT farm opened off the coast of Kent, UK this week. However, a new breed of vertical axis wind turbines (VAWT) are on the up and up.
VAWTs feature a vertical shaft around which airstream-intercepting wings swirl (see Picture). The "lift" of the wind tangentially yanks the turbine around.
Their advantage? They can harvest airflow from all directions, plus are cheaper to maintain than standard turbines because their generators and gearboxes are on or near the ground.
One downside is that an individual VAWT is less efficient than a typical three-rotor turbine, says aeronautical engineer John Dabiri at Caltech in Pasadena.
However, HAWTs are not perfect. They have to be spaced wide apart - up to 10 times their rotor diameter – to avoid the blades of a neighbouring turbine slowing down the wind too much. That means building them offshore or where there is plenty of land.
VAWTs churn up less of the surrounding air. So Dabiri and colleagues wanted to find out if packing them as tight as possible could rival the overall efficiency of a typical wind farm.
Read more:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19492-green-machine-wind-farms-make-like-a-fish.html
Scientific uranium study kicks off / Uranium study committee assesses knowledge gaps
Uranium study committee assesses knowledge gaps
By TARA BOZICK
Published: October 27, 2010
WASHINGTON — Studying the various issues enveloping uranium mining in Virginia won’t be easy.
Meetings on Tuesday and Wednesday at the Keck Center in Washington served as information-gathering sessions so the committee could begin carrying out its charge — to offer independent scientific advice that state leaders could use to decide whether uranium mining could be done safely and responsibly in Virginia.
While the study is statewide in scope, Virginia’s geologic features vary. Additionally, not much has been studied in the way of the state’s water.
On top of that, each hypothetical mining or milling site would feature different characteristics and would need site-specific studies.
“You’re all starting from scratch pretty much,” David Nelms, groundwater specialist with the USGS Virginia Water Science Center, told the committee. Few hydrogeology studies were conducted in Virginia, he said.
“Geology is very important,” he said. “Everybody has talked about how complex it is in Virginia. Well, add hydro to geology and it makes it even more complicated.”
If leaders are trying to prevent adverse environmental effects from uranium mining or milling, it’s important to know the delivery system, Nelms said.
Groundwater supplies the majority of stream flow.
James Otton with the U.S. Geological Survey, told committee members that Virginia has various geologic “terranes” because the continent kept breaking up and reassembling itself. The collisions between the blocks of crust resulted in sheared rock.
Most of the uranium occurrences with “resource potential” in Virginia appear in this sheared rock, Otton said. He cited 55 known occurrences of uranium in Virginia, as reported by geologist William Lassetter.
Sheared rock also hosts the 119-million-pound uranium ore body at Coles Hill in Pittsylvania County — the “elephant deposit” in Virginia, Otton said. Virginia Uranium Inc. proposes to mine and mill that uranium deposit.
Yet, geologists don’t know how the Coles Hill uranium ore body formed, he said. So, they don’t know if Coles Hill is incidentally unique, or if uranium could occur in places with similar conditions.
Seal analyzed what the Coles Hill waste rock would look like using rock core samples taken during exploration drilling.
Element concentrations that would exceed environmental guidelines are uranium and vanadium, he said. Removal of the uranium would return the soil toward environmental guidelines.
“We’re trying to educate decision makers on potential risks and potential solutions for challenges as they come up,” Seal said.
Norm Reynolds, a director on the board for Virginia Energy Resources (an investor in Virginia Uranium Inc.), offered the company’s data to the committee. Reynolds, a geologist, was on the team that discovered the Coles Hill deposit for Marline Uranium Corp., which abandoned the project during the 1980s.
Cale Jaffe, senior attorney with Southern Environmental Law Center, reminded the committee that Virginia had a moratorium on uranium mining and milling since 1982.
Jaffe asked the committee to consider environmental and public health impacts from potential increased activity if Virginia mills uranium mined from other states.
Read more:
Scientific uranium study kicks off
By TARA BOZICK
Published: October 26, 2010
WASHINGTON — The first meeting of the provisional committee conducting a scientific study of uranium mining in Virginia kicked off Tuesday.
The Uranium Mining Subcommittee of the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission asked the National Academy of Sciences to conduct the study to offer independent scientific advice so state leaders could determine whether uranium mining could be done safely and responsibly in Virginia.
Delegate R. Lee Ware, Jr., chair of the subcommittee, emphasized to the provisional committee members the scientific study is a statewide study.
“Obviously, any decision we make will have consequences across the commonwealth regarding uranium mining,” Ware said.
The study is due to be completed by December 2011.
Although Virginia has had a moratorium on uranium mining since 1982, Virginia Uranium Inc. proposes to mine and mill a 119-million-pound uranium ore deposit in Pittsylvania County.
Tuesday’s meeting helped provisional committee members gather more information to do the study. The committee has not been finalized yet, said Jennifer Walsh, NAS spokeswoman.
Four of the 13 provisional committee members — Jill Lipoti, Corby Anderson, Michel Cuney and Patricia Buffler — were absent.
Karmis reviewed the study scope or committee’s “statement of task,” which includes scientific, technical, environmental, human health and safety aspects.
The statement of task also includes a review of Virginia’s uranium resources and exploration statuses, Karmis said.
This helps the experts in studying their geologic, environmental and climatic aspects. It could also help Virginia identify resource opportunities, Ware said.
The public will be able to participate in town hall meetings regarding the scientific study in Danville in December and in Richmond in February.
Several Pittsylvania County residents opposed to uranium mining in Virginia came to the meeting.
Phillip Lovelace, a Pittsylvania County farmer who raises cattle for beef, emphasized the need to pay special attention to hydrology. He doesn’t want to see Virginia’s waters damaged.
“We face devastation in this community if it gets in their drinking water,” Lovelace told the committee.
He doesn’t think regulations go far enough to protect the public or environment.
“There’s a lot of ‘if’s’ in this yet,” he said.
Olga Kolotushkina, representing the Roanoke River Basin Association, noted the implications the study would have for the state and asked committee members to take the study seriously and examine any perceived conflicts of interest.
“It’s not just about Southside. It’s not just about Coles Hill,” she said
Cale Jaffe, senior attorney with Southern Environmental Law Center, was glad to see the committee would examine “severe weather effects,” as noted in the statement of task.
He would like to know more about disaster preparedness and ways to secure the site during an event like a hurricane and consequences of failing to do so.
Jaffe said the BP oil spill in the Gulf showed people that things don’t always go according to industry plans.
The meeting continues Wednesday.
Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2010/oct/26/uranium-study-meeting-kicks-ar-588582/
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Radon in Schools
The 1993 Virginia General Assembly passed legislation that requires all schools in the Commonwealth to be tested for radon after July 1, 1994, as well as any new school buildings. Each school is required to maintain files of radon test results. The full text of the law is provided at the bottom of this page.
In general radon test results for schools were below the EPA guidance of 4 pCi/L of radon in air. Although there were several test results that indicated high radon levels, a review of the data and testing methodology indicates most of these test results were not valid for any of the following reasons: insufficient test period and improperly testing closed areas, such as boiler rooms and storage rooms.
For the few schools that did have elevated radon levels, the school's ventilation system was found not to be working properly, i.e. dirty filters, unbalanced air flow. In these instances, radon levels were easily reduced after correcting the ventilation problem.
If you have any questions regarding radon levels in any particular school, contact that school's administration.
Note to School Administrators:
• Radon test kits are available that may be placed and retrieved by school employees, then mailed to a laboratory for processing.
• Test only classrooms that are on the the ground floor (Do not test storerooms, boiler rooms and closets)
• Testing for radon is simple- contact VDH at (804) 864-8150 and ask our radon staff for assistance.
Code of Virginia Section § 22.1-138. Minimum standards for public school buildings
A. The Board of Education shall prescribe by regulation minimum standards for the erection of or addition to public school buildings governing instructional, operational, health and maintenance facilities where these are not specifically addressed in the Uniform Statewide Building Code.
B. By July 1, 1994, every school building in operation in the Commonwealth shall be tested for radon pursuant to procedures established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for radon measurements in schools.
School buildings and additions opened for operation after July 1, 1994, shall be tested for radon pursuant to such EPA procedures and regulations prescribed by the Board of Education pursuant to subsection A of this section. Each school shall maintain files of its radon test results and make such files available for review. The division superintendent shall report radon test results to the Department of Health.
(1980, c. 559; 1993, c. 765.)
http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiology/radiologicalhealth/radon/schools.htm
Friday, October 29, 2010
DCC to offer solar power class
By TARA BOZICK
Published: October 06, 2010
Because of local interest in solar power, Danville Community College will offer a “Solar Power and Installation” class for the spring semester.
“It’s a coming technology,” said Jerry Franklin, director of manufacturing and technical services at the Regional Center for Applied Technology and Training. “We are trying to stay on the leading edge of technologies that are pertinent to this area.”
Business and economic development leaders are helping to grow alternative energy in the region. Hopes are Danville might attract a solar farm or a solar manufacturer.
The class is open to the public and will introduce students to solar energy and how it is installed in a home environment, Franklin said. Solar uses could be from running a pump for a water fountain to actually generating some or all of the power a family needs.
DCC bought three solar trainers with solar panels and associated household components for lab work.
The first class meets at RCATT in Room 103 on Jan. 11 next year.
The class meets on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 5 to 8 p.m. and will be taught by Mike Jones.
Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2010/oct/06/dcc-offer-solar-power-class-ar-547051/
Published: October 06, 2010
Because of local interest in solar power, Danville Community College will offer a “Solar Power and Installation” class for the spring semester.
“It’s a coming technology,” said Jerry Franklin, director of manufacturing and technical services at the Regional Center for Applied Technology and Training. “We are trying to stay on the leading edge of technologies that are pertinent to this area.”
Business and economic development leaders are helping to grow alternative energy in the region. Hopes are Danville might attract a solar farm or a solar manufacturer.
The class is open to the public and will introduce students to solar energy and how it is installed in a home environment, Franklin said. Solar uses could be from running a pump for a water fountain to actually generating some or all of the power a family needs.
DCC bought three solar trainers with solar panels and associated household components for lab work.
The first class meets at RCATT in Room 103 on Jan. 11 next year.
The class meets on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 5 to 8 p.m. and will be taught by Mike Jones.
Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2010/oct/06/dcc-offer-solar-power-class-ar-547051/
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Green Halloween Tips
Dressing up and celebrating Halloween can be fun -- especially for kids. It's easy to make it a healthy holiday for your family and the environment. Just follow these simple steps to green your Halloween routine:
1. Pick play makeup carefully. Many children like to wear colorful cosmetics as part of their costumes. If they do, make sure they're using safer products and applying them as directed. Visit cosmeticsdatabase.com to look up your products and find safer ones.
Kids should avoid:
•Face paints can contain lead, which can impair brain development at extremely low doses, as well as nickel, cobalt and chromium, which can cause skin sensitization and contact dermatitis. Learn more here.
•Lipstick can also contain hidden lead. Because little ones tend to eat almost as much as they put on their lips, it's best to avoid lipstick all together. Opt instead for a shiny, beeswax-based lip balm. You can find some on Amazon.
•Nail polish often contains dibutyl phthalate and toluene, chemicals linked to hormone disruption and cancer. You can find safer nail polishes on Skin Deep.
•Cosmetics in powder form can easily be inhaled. Depending on the particle size, the powder can lodge in children's nasal passages and even lungs -- where it may cause damage.
•Fragranced products Read ingredient labels and avoid products listing "fragrance" -- EWG research found that fragrances may contain allergens or hormone-disrupting chemicals. Learn more in our short video.
2. Skip the (colored) hairspray. Many hairsprays contain toxic chemicals and fragrance. Kids can easily breathe in sprays. Instead, find a great hat or wig at a second-hand store; or create a great hair-do with ribbons, barrettes and safer, non-spray hair products.
3. Burn more eco-friendly candles -- if at all. Candles can give off toxic compounds. Choose fragrance-free candles made from bee, palm or soy wax. Traditional paraffin-wax candles are made from petroleum by-products. Order your eco-friendly candles.
4. Don't wear synthetic facemasks or teeth. Masks and fake teeth are made from a variety of synthetic materials that aren't always labeled. Plastics may be softened with endocrine-disrupting phthalates. Rather than covering your head with unknown, possibly toxic materials, make your own mask from simple materials or try a half-face, masquerade-style mask instead.
5. Offer treats that you would like your kids to receive. Hand out items that have fewer, more natural ingredients. Click here and here for more tips on choosing Halloween treats.
6. Create a low-impact costume. Rather than buying a new costume, get creative with items you already own or can get used at a local resale shop or from friends. Consider a costume swap at school or among friends. Click here to learn more about hosting your own swap.
7. If you are going to a party or planning a quick meal, skip the single-use dinnerware. Choose a more sustainable option, like compostable products. Click here to find compostable dinnerware on Amazon.
8. Decorate naturally. Pick up pumpkins, gourds and hay bales from a local farm to create a haunting scene and reuse decorations from year to year.
Read more:
http://www.ewg.org/healthyhometips/halloweentips?utm_source=halloweenfull&utm_medium=email&utm_content=first-link&utm_campaign=hht
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
NAS Meeting: Uranium Mining in Virginia
Meeting 1: Uranium Mining in Virginia
October 26, 2010 - October 27, 2010
Keck Center
500 5th Street, NW
Washington D.C. 20001
Click below to see Agenda:
If you would like to attend the sessions of this meeting that are open to the public or need more information please contact:
Contact Name: Courtney Gibbs
Email: cgibbs@nas.edu
Phone: 202-334-2744
Fax: 202-334-1377
EPA Awards $1.5 Million in Environmental Education Grants
CONTACTS:
Dale Kemery (News Media Only)
kemery.dale@epa.gov
202-564-7839
202-564-4355
Jalil Isa (News Media Only)
isa.jalil@epa.gov
202-564-3226
202-564-4355
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 6, 2010
EPA Awards $1.5 Million in Environmental Education Grants
WASHINGTON – In an effort to improve environmental literacy and stewardship across the country, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has awarded more than $1.5 million in grants to 14 organizations in 11 states and the District of Columbia. The organizations will use the money to fund environmental education efforts, which work to inform the public of environmental issues and help them make educated choices on actions they can take to reduce negative environmental impacts.
“Every American community relies on clean air, water and land for their environmental and economic health. We want to help expand awareness on how they can get involved in environmental protection,” EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said. ”These grants will help communities across the country show how a clean environment starts at home.”
The grants help EPA expand the conversation on environmentalism by increasing the number of underserved audiences that participate in the agency’s programs and activities. This year, some of the grant money went toward helping tribal communities set up leadership programs, letting students step outside the classroom in order to learn about the environment, and working to help students understand the importance of water quality, among many other projects. Highlights from this year’s recipients include:
The Native Wellness Institute of Portland, Ore. received $102,000 to implement the “Native Youth Environment Warriors” project, which will provide environmental education and leadership training and support to native youth and their community mentors to design and implement environmental projects in their tribal communities.
The Island Institute of Rockland, Maine received nearly $124,000 for the “Energy for Maine” project, which includes community discussions and analysis of renewable energy sources. The project is aiming to increase home and school energy efficiency through student/teacher, and family-generated solutions for reducing energy consumption.
The annual awards are given to nonprofit organizations, government agencies, community groups, schools and universities. The recipients of the 2010 competition represent a mix of organizations addressing a variety of environmental issues from climate change to water quality, and dealing with local, regional, or national issues.
EPA awards the funds under the 1990 National Environmental Education Act, which gives the agency the authority to support and create environmental education programs nationwide.
More information about EPA’s environmental education grants recipients: http://www.epa.gov/education/grants.html
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Eastern Mennonite University to add solar roof to its library
October 06, 2010 4:12 PM
Eastern Mennonite University is adding a solar roof to its library in what will become the largest solar project in Virginia.
The project will include the installation of more than 300 photovoltaic panels on the roof of the university’s library in Harrisonburg
The roof will generate 104.3 kilowatts of electricity — or enough to provide electricity for nine homes for a year. Currently, the largest solar roof in Virginia is at the Merrifield Post Office, which produces 84 kilowatts.
“This solar project represents good stewardship of the university’s financial resources and the Earth’s natural resources,“ EMU President Loren Swartzendruber said in a statement.
“It will also offer a highly visible case study for our students and our community about the pragmatic benefits of clean renewable energy.“
The university plans to add even more solar power to its campus. Secure Futures will seek investors to install a 300-megawatt solar roof on the university’s commons
Read more:
http://www.virginiabusiness.com/index.php/news/article/eastern-mennonite-university-to-add-solar-roof-to-its-library/307991/
NAS Meetings: Meeting 1: Uranium Mining in Virginia
Meeting 1: Uranium Mining in Virginia
October 26, 2010 - October 27, 2010
Keck Center
500 5th Street, NW
Washington D.C. 20001
Click below to see Agenda:
If you would like to attend the sessions of this meeting that are open to the public or need more information please contact:
Contact Name: Courtney Gibbs
Email: cgibbs@nas.edu
Phone: 202-334-2744
Fax: 202-334-1377
Monday, October 25, 2010
NAS Meetings: Meeting 1: Uranium Mining in Virginia
Meeting 1: Uranium Mining in Virginia
October 26, 2010 - October 27, 2010
Keck Center
500 5th Street, NW
Washington D.C. 20001
Click below to see Agenda:
If you would like to attend the sessions of this meeting that are open to the public or need more information please contact:
Contact Name: Courtney Gibbs
Email: cgibbs@nas.edu
Phone: 202-334-2744
Fax: 202-334-1377
Landowner Wants to End Ban on Mining Radioactive Element: Uranium
Uranium Lode in Va. Is Feared, Coveted
Landowner Wants to End Ban on Mining Radioactive Element Sought for Energy
By Anita Kumar
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
CHATHAM, Va. -- Underneath a plot of farmland used to raise cattle, hay and timber in south central Virginia lies a deposit of uranium in the United States.
Now, three decades after the deposit was found, landowner Walter Coles has set his sights on mining the 200-acre site despite concerns of environmental groups and residents about unearthed radioactive material that could contaminate the area's land, air and source of drinking water.
The estimated 110 million pounds of uranium in Pittsylvania County.
There's a hurdle to clear before an ounce of the element can be mined: It's illegal to dig for the stuff in Virginia. But the General Assembly is considering changing that.
Coles, 69, who recently retired from the federal government and moved from the Washington area back to the family farm, said mining companies have been offering to buy his land. Instead of taking the money, he decided to stay. He said he wanted to make sure that the mining was done safely and that it would benefit the community through jobs, taxes and economic development.
"There's too much uranium here. Somebody's going to mine it," Coles said. "I felt like while I was alive, it was my duty to make sure it was done right."
This month, Coles's company, Virginia Uranium, will try to persuade the General Assembly to take the first step -- approving a $1 million study that will explore whether uranium can be safely mined in Virginia. If the study shows that it can be done, the company will ask the legislature to lift a state ban on uranium mining.
The issue is dividing lawmakers, who will begin their 60-day session Jan. 9, but company officials have reasons to be optimistic.
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) supports a study, and a state energy report released this fall recommends one. Coles's brother-in-law, Whitt Clement, who served as a legislator and as state transportation secretary, is heading what is expected to be a strong lobbying effort.
Henry Hurt, an investor and a childhood friend of Coles's, has a son Robert, a Pittsylvania delegate who won a state Senate seat in November.
Virginia banned uranium mining in 1982, but Coles's company recently got a state permit to drill 40 holes to examine the material.
A growing coalition of environmental groups and concerned residents, some of the same residents who helped institute the ban 30 years ago, have started spreading the word about their opposition and are planning to travel to Richmond to fight Coles.
Elizabeth Haskell, a former state secretary of natural resources who served on a board that studied uranium mining in the early 1980s, said Coles is thinking about money, not safety. "He has got dollar signs in his eyes," she said.
Uranium has never been mined in Virginia or on the East Coast, confined instead in the United States to drier, less populated areas such as Utah, New Mexico, Wyoming and Nebraska, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Uranium mining is more common in Canada, Australia, Eastern Europe and Africa.
Support for a Study
Two uranium deposits, which begin at the ground's surface and run about 800 feet deep, were found in Coles Hill, near Chatham, a town of 1,300 residents where old Victorian houses line the streets. Tobacco was once a booming business on nearby farms but has given way to soybeans, hay and cattle.
A Canadian company, Marline Uranium, found the deposits in the late 1970s after the federal government had encouraged a search for alternative energy sources. It spent millions of dollars trying to get permission to mine the land, but interest waned after uranium prices dropped.
Geologists think that smaller amounts of uranium can be found along the Piedmont from North Carolina to New York. Virginia Uranium is not interested in mining other parts of the state, but officials are passing nonbinding resolutions supporting the state ban for fear that another company might try to mine their land.
Still, with accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl a distant memory and a growing global demand for alternative fuels, interest in uranium mining is peaking.
Virginia Uranium wants to mine and mill uranium that would eventually be sold to companies for use at nuclear power plants.
The company was formed about a year ago by the Coles and Bowen families, which own adjoining property. Norman Reynolds, a former Marline president, was hired as chief executive.
Thirty other people have invested in the company, several of whom live in the area, including Henry Hurt, a former editor for Reader's Digest.
Hurt's son Robert served three terms in the House before winning his Senate seat. Coles's son Walter, who is executive vice president of Virginia Uranium, and Reynolds together donated $1,500 to Hurt last year, according to the Virginia Public Access Project.
Robert Hurt, a Republican whose House and Senate districts include Coles Hill, said he supports a study but does not have enough information to know whether he favors mining. He said he does not need to recuse himself from a vote on the study because no profit is at stake for his father.
Virginia Uranium says it would pay for the study but would allow it to be conducted by an independent group or university.
Safety Concerns
Environmental groups, including the Piedmont Environmental Council and the Southern Environmental Law Center, say uranium should not be mined in Virginia's highly populated areas and relatively rainy climate. They say they are worried that radioactive materials could contaminate natural resources, cause cancer or other illnesses and have long-term effects on plants and animals. The Coles Hill area supplies drinking water locally and to parts of Hampton Roads and North Carolina.
Del. Clarke N. Hogan (R-Charlotte), whose district gets some of its drinking water from the area, said Virginia Uranium has to prove how mining can be done safely.
"They have a long way to go," he said. "They need to show what is different from 30 years ago."
Uranium can be mined three ways: through an open pit, by miners underground or through a technology that involves pumping liquid underground and bringing it up to be processed.
Company officials said they will not know which method would work best in Pittsylvania until a study is completed, although open-pit mining is the least expensive. They will not say how much money has been invested, but they estimate they will need at least $500 million to build a mine and mill.
Jack Dunavant, a civil engineer who leads Southside Concerned Citizens, said Coles "keeps talking about new technology that can make it safe. There is no new technology. It's a pipe dream."
No matter how the uranium might be mined, it would need to be processed at a local milling facility. The result, a sandy substance called "yellow cake" uranium, would be packed into 55-gallon drums for shipping.
Company officials say the processed uranium is not hazardous. It doesn't become dangerous until it undergoes a later process that would be done elsewhere.
He said he plans to continue living at Coles Hill regardless of whether the uranium is mined.
"I could have sold the land and moved to Florida. But I didn't," he said. "I want to stay and do something good for the community, something good for the state."
Staff researcher Meg Smith contributed to this report.
Read more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/01/AR2008010101811.html
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Study will gauge impact of Virginia uranium mining
By: STEVE SZKOTAK
Associated Press
10/24/10 12:50 PM EDT
RICHMOND, VA. — A one-year study intended to assess the statewide consequences of uranium mining in Virginia begins this week when a National Academy of Sciences panel convenes for two days in Washington, D.C.
The 13-member study committee has a broad charge to assess the implications of lifting a 1982 ban on uranium mining in Virginia. Its conclusions are due in December 2011, and will be key to any General Assembly deliberations to lift the ban.
Virginia Uranium Inc. has proposed mining a 119 million-pound deposit in Southside Virginia, near the North Carolina border.
The proposal has met fierce opposition from some local residents who fears (knows-PerAce) the mining and milling of the ore will foul local farm fields and streams and water sources for localities as far away as Hampton Roads.
The provisional members of the study panel, some of who have been challenged because of their ties to mining or the nuclear-power industry, are meeting in Washington to hear from a lineup of government officials, according to an agenda for the Board on Earth Sciences, a division of the National Academy.
The study group is scheduled to hear from officials from the Department of Energy, on the national and global uranium market; the U.S. Geological Survey, on Virginia uranium deposits and various aspects of mining and milling; and the Environmental Protection Agency, on regulatory matters.
A spokeswoman for the academy, Jennifer Walsh, said the presentations will help guide the future meetings of the committee. The first Virginia meeting of the committee is scheduled for Danville in mid-December, after another round of meetings in November in Washington.
The $1.4 million study will examine the scientific, technical, environmental, human health and safety of uranium mining and processing.
Local studies are also planned, and Walsh said the findings could be submitted to the National Academy panel if they deal with issues "pertinent to this task."
Much of the environmental criticism has focused on the wisdom of uranium mining in the Southeast, which is subject to tropical storms and hurricanes that churn up the coast and can turn inland. Most domestic uranium mining occurs in the arid West. They are fearful a powerful storm blowing through Virginia or North Carolina would scatter uranium tailings through the region and onto crops or into water supplies.
Tailings are the waste rock separated from the uranium ore in the milling process, which uses a chemical agent.
Jack Dunavant, chairman of the Southside Concerned Citizens, said he has little confidence in the National Academy study because Virginia Uranium is financing it.
Online: National Academies: http://www.nationalacademies.org/
Read more: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/breaking/va-uranium-study-set-to-launch-105628633.html
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Top 10 Ways to Make Your Home Green
Do something good for your family, your pocketbook, and the environment.
Make your home a little greener.
To be green, you've got to be efficient:
1. Use CFLs
Replace your incandescent light bulbs (the cheap ones you probably got at the grocery store) with ENERGY STAR® qualified compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs). By replacing even your five most frequently used light bulbs, you'll save $100 per year.
2. Program Your Thermostats
Save 10% on your heating and cooling costs just by setting your thermostat back when you're not home and while you're sleeping. Program your thermostat to 78 degrees F or higher in the summer and 62 degrees F or lower in the winter. .
3. Plug Air Leaks
Air leaks are the greatest energy waster in the home, but they can be simple to plug. Install weatherstripping and caulk to stop those expensive drafts and improve comfort. It's cheap and easy, and almost anyone can do it. Look for leaks around windows, doors, electrical outlets, plumbing penetrations, and in the attic floor.
4. Tune-Up Your HVAC
HVAC maintenance is key to healthy and efficient heating and cooling. Get a professional tune-up every two years. . Dirty filters block normal airflow and significantly reduce the efficiency of the system, which wastes your money.
5. Go Low-Flow
Install low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators to save resources without sacrificing water pressure. An efficient showerhead will save a family of four up to $285 per year.
6. Optimize Your Water Heater
If you don't have one installed already, put an insulative jacket around your hot water heater, and insulate the pipes around the water heater.Also consider turning the temperature on the water heater down to 120 degrees. It will save you money and prevent scalding.
7. Plant a Tree
Shade trees can significantly lower your cooling costs by up to 25% . They also make your home more comfortable, and provide habitat for song birds. In addition, properly placed trees and shrubs act as windbreaks, shielding your home from cold winds and reducing heating costs by 20%.
8. Buy ENERGY STAR
When replacing your appliances, select ENERGY STAR qualified products. When replacing your water heater, furnace, or air conditioner, you should also select ENERGY STAR qualified products. You will save 10-30% on the operating costs vs. non-ENERGY STAR equivalents.
9. Request a Blower Door Test
A blower door test will uncover the hidden holes and cracks that are the main source of energy loss in your home. For example an open fireplace damper can let 8% of your heating costs slip out the chimney. Hiring a certified Home Energy Rater (HERS) costs $200 to $400 and is worth every penny.
10. Use Low-VOC products
After painting, the volatile organic compound level can be 1,000 times the healthy normal level. Select low or no-VOC paints and finishes to combat this health hazard. When selecting paints, look for the Green Seal. When cleaning around the house, use non-toxic natural products or make your own green cleaning products.
11. And a Bonus...Check Insulation
Make sure that there are no areas in your attic floor with inadequate insulation. Insulation is your 'Great Wall of China' against heat loss. Imagine the effectiveness of the Great Wall in protecting against invaders if it had a 300 foot gap in it, or only stood a couple of feet high. Insulation works the same way. Even a small area with limited or no insulation, or insulation that has been damaged or compressed, can significantly decrease the effectiveness of the area's insulation.
Read more:
http://www.pathnet.org/sp.asp?id=18438
Make your home a little greener.
To be green, you've got to be efficient:
1. Use CFLs
Replace your incandescent light bulbs (the cheap ones you probably got at the grocery store) with ENERGY STAR® qualified compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs). By replacing even your five most frequently used light bulbs, you'll save $100 per year.
2. Program Your Thermostats
Save 10% on your heating and cooling costs just by setting your thermostat back when you're not home and while you're sleeping. Program your thermostat to 78 degrees F or higher in the summer and 62 degrees F or lower in the winter. .
3. Plug Air Leaks
Air leaks are the greatest energy waster in the home, but they can be simple to plug. Install weatherstripping and caulk to stop those expensive drafts and improve comfort. It's cheap and easy, and almost anyone can do it. Look for leaks around windows, doors, electrical outlets, plumbing penetrations, and in the attic floor.
4. Tune-Up Your HVAC
HVAC maintenance is key to healthy and efficient heating and cooling. Get a professional tune-up every two years. . Dirty filters block normal airflow and significantly reduce the efficiency of the system, which wastes your money.
5. Go Low-Flow
Install low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators to save resources without sacrificing water pressure. An efficient showerhead will save a family of four up to $285 per year.
6. Optimize Your Water Heater
If you don't have one installed already, put an insulative jacket around your hot water heater, and insulate the pipes around the water heater.Also consider turning the temperature on the water heater down to 120 degrees. It will save you money and prevent scalding.
7. Plant a Tree
Shade trees can significantly lower your cooling costs by up to 25% . They also make your home more comfortable, and provide habitat for song birds. In addition, properly placed trees and shrubs act as windbreaks, shielding your home from cold winds and reducing heating costs by 20%.
8. Buy ENERGY STAR
When replacing your appliances, select ENERGY STAR qualified products. When replacing your water heater, furnace, or air conditioner, you should also select ENERGY STAR qualified products. You will save 10-30% on the operating costs vs. non-ENERGY STAR equivalents.
9. Request a Blower Door Test
A blower door test will uncover the hidden holes and cracks that are the main source of energy loss in your home. For example an open fireplace damper can let 8% of your heating costs slip out the chimney. Hiring a certified Home Energy Rater (HERS) costs $200 to $400 and is worth every penny.
10. Use Low-VOC products
After painting, the volatile organic compound level can be 1,000 times the healthy normal level. Select low or no-VOC paints and finishes to combat this health hazard. When selecting paints, look for the Green Seal. When cleaning around the house, use non-toxic natural products or make your own green cleaning products.
11. And a Bonus...Check Insulation
Make sure that there are no areas in your attic floor with inadequate insulation. Insulation is your 'Great Wall of China' against heat loss. Imagine the effectiveness of the Great Wall in protecting against invaders if it had a 300 foot gap in it, or only stood a couple of feet high. Insulation works the same way. Even a small area with limited or no insulation, or insulation that has been damaged or compressed, can significantly decrease the effectiveness of the area's insulation.
Read more:
http://www.pathnet.org/sp.asp?id=18438
Friday, October 22, 2010
10 Reuses for Single-Use Gift Bags
By Cara Smusiak,
NaturallySavvy.com
Sun Oct 3, 2010 14:47
We all have some: Gift bags that have been reused, but have a tear or are generally looking too rough around the edges for another use. It may seem like time to toss them in the recycling bin, but many single-use gift bags is they have a plastic coating, meaning they can't be recycled.
The good news is that even when a gift bag has outlived its intended purpose, it can be upcycled in a number of ways:
1.Make gift tags for holidays, birthdays and other occasions.
2.Add it to the kids craft bin. Kids can use old gift bags for a variety of crafts and art projects.
3.A scrunched-up gift bag makes for an excellent packing material. Since gift bags are a heavier weight paper, it will hold its shape a lot better, making it a good option for packing around a variety of objects.
4.For gift bags with cartoon characters or a lovely design on the front, cut out the image and frame it for simple, quick, and budget-friendly art for you or your kids.
5.Add a little pizzaz to your storage solutions by labeling each box with a tag made from an old gift bag. Use contrasting colors or patterns if you want your labels to really stand out.
6.Use pieces cut out from a few gift bags to create a mosaic border on a mirror, picture frame, or cork board.
7.Use a large gift bag to make a book protector.
8.Make a funky envelope for sending mail to friends and family.
9.If the front and back panels of the gift bag are in good shape, use them to wrap small gifts or packages to be sent in the mail.
With so many ways to use old gift bags, you're sure to never throw one out again.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
WATER CONSERVATION FUN FACTS
Posted by Eco Home Consultations
Monday, October 11 2010
What did people do before indoor plumbing?
Well, they were probably much more careful about how they used their water since they had to fetch it from the well and carry it to the house.
Now that we have water available to us at the flick of the tap, it can be easy to forget that we need to use the water wisely even if we don’t have to work so hard for it.
According to the EPA, the average water faucet streams between 3 to 5 gallons per minute and the average shower, 5 to 10 gallons per minute.
Read on for more tips on how to conserve:
• One water saving technique that stirs controversy is selective flushing of the toilet. The average toilet uses 5 to 7 gallons per flush.
• Fix any leaks you notice right away. Even the smallest of leaks can cost you up to 170 gallons of water a day! Check your pipes from time to time, and don’t ignore the toilet that keeps running. And the most shocking fact, that annoying dripping faucet can rob you of 1000 gallons per year!
• Use drip irrigation rather than a full power sprinkler for your landscape watering. Rather than spraying water all over the plants, drip irrigation provides a slow trickle of water to your plants. This is a more efficient use of the water as it targets the place where plants need it most – the roots.
• Call your public utility company and ask for a water conservation kit. You can get lots of cool things, usually for free.
Learn more at http://www.ecohomeconsults.com/
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Danville center aims to grow biofuel industry
By Tara Bozick
Published: October 15, 2010
Currently, Piedmont BioProducts in Gretna outsources the testing of its bio-crude oil.
When the Sustainable Energy Technology Center or “SEnTeC” opens in Danville, the local company potentially could have that testing done here.
On Friday, state and local leaders celebrated the groundbreaking of SEnTeC — a research and development facility that would commercialize bio-energy projects for the region through contract research, developing licensed technologies or creating spin-off businesses.
Construction should be completed by November 2011.
Piedmont BioProducts is already working with the Institute for Sustainable and Renewable Resources at the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research campus on developing better-yielding non-food plants for use in biofuels.
SEnTeC will build on ISRR’s academic work to take the lead for developing a bio-based industry in Southern Virginia.
The center’s projects would include conducting feasibility studies for installing bio-refineries in the region and engaging local farmers for plant trials. Institute leaders are talking with potential corporate partners to form a program strategy.
Davis foresees the region becoming a “green energy valley” for Virginia.
“Today is another example that it is true if you can imagine it, you can build it,” said Mayor Sherman Saunders, a former tobacco farmer.
Moss said the bio-energy industry and local resources offer entrepreneurial opportunities for locals.
Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2010/oct/15/danville-center-aims-grow-biofuel-industry-ar-566335/
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Uranium mining disaster
Thursday, October 14, 2010
How could any Virginian who loves this state support uranium mining? Does he or she not realize the risk? Does one have to wait until a catastrophe such as the gulf oil spill occurs to come to one’s senses? Consider this:
1. While uranium exists naturally in the ground, when exposed to air and water, radiation is released.
2. Because of this release, most of such mining of uranium occurs in dry parts in the western part of the U.S.
3. Even so, in these areas, uranium removal and processing have caused effects such as contamination of groundwater as well as surface water.
4. The risks of cancer threatens the residents as well as the workers.
Do we really want this for the farmlands, meadows, rivers, lakes and streams that add so much to our community? Do we want to risk the lives of our children and grandchildren for a few extra bucks and a few dangerous jobs?
Apparently, no regulations exist in Virginia for uranium mining. Nor does the federal government have regulations for such mining in our climate.
Are you really willing to sacrifice our beautiful community and state? I particularly love this part of Virginia and have lived a good part of my life here working and raising my family. Please say “no” to uranium mining and save the beauty and health of our farms, forests and families.
Jean K. Martin
Martinsville
Read more:
HTTP://WWW.MARTINSVILLEBULLETIN.COM/ARTICLE.CFM?ID=25689
How could any Virginian who loves this state support uranium mining? Does he or she not realize the risk? Does one have to wait until a catastrophe such as the gulf oil spill occurs to come to one’s senses? Consider this:
1. While uranium exists naturally in the ground, when exposed to air and water, radiation is released.
2. Because of this release, most of such mining of uranium occurs in dry parts in the western part of the U.S.
3. Even so, in these areas, uranium removal and processing have caused effects such as contamination of groundwater as well as surface water.
4. The risks of cancer threatens the residents as well as the workers.
Do we really want this for the farmlands, meadows, rivers, lakes and streams that add so much to our community? Do we want to risk the lives of our children and grandchildren for a few extra bucks and a few dangerous jobs?
Apparently, no regulations exist in Virginia for uranium mining. Nor does the federal government have regulations for such mining in our climate.
Are you really willing to sacrifice our beautiful community and state? I particularly love this part of Virginia and have lived a good part of my life here working and raising my family. Please say “no” to uranium mining and save the beauty and health of our farms, forests and families.
Jean K. Martin
Martinsville
Read more:
HTTP://WWW.MARTINSVILLEBULLETIN.COM/ARTICLE.CFM?ID=25689
Monday, October 18, 2010
Solar Power Blowing Up in the United States
Zachary Shahan
Online editor
October 13, 2010
A new report out by the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA) and GTM Research, the inaugural U.S. Solar Market Insight™ report, finds that solar power is going to continue its rapid growth in the United States.
2010 has been the best year ever for solar power in the United States, but much more is expected in the future. “Solar is now the fastest growing energy industry in the U.S., employing nearly 100,000 Americans and generating billions of dollars of economic growth for our economy,” President and CEO of the SEIA Rhone Resch writes.
By 2015, as you can see in the graph above, the solar industry is expected to grow several times over, perhaps even reaching a total of 10 GW of installed solar power capacity, enough to power 2 million homes.
“We can install so much solar energy that we will eliminate the need for any new coal or nuclear power plants in the U.S. ever again,” Resch writes.
Total 2010 installations are going to more than double solar power capacity in the US. The baseline estimate is that 944 MW of solar electric capacity will be installed by the end of the year, and the high forecast shows solar capacity rising above 1 GW and reaching 1.13 GW of capacity. At the end of 2009, solar electric capacity was at 441 MW.
Read more:
http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/13/solar-power-blowing-up-in-the-united-states/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+cleantechnica%2Fcom+%28CleanTechnica%29
Sunday, October 17, 2010
What to Do if a Mercury Thermometer Breaks
NOTE: these instructions also apply to spills from other sources, if the amount spilled is less than or similar to the amount in a thermometer (see specific information about how to clean up broken fluorescent bulbs)
• Have everyone else leave the area; don't let anyone walk through the mercury on their way out. Make sure all pets are removed from the area. Open all windows and doors to the outside; shut all doors to other parts of the house.
• DO NOT allow children to help you clean up the spill.
• Mercury can be cleaned up easily from the following surfaces: wood, linoleum, tile and any similarly smooth surfaces.
• If a spill occurs on carpet, curtains, upholstery or other absorbent surfaces, these contaminated items should be thrown away in accordance with the disposal means outlined below. Only cut and remove the affected portion of the contaminated carpet for disposal.
Items needed to clean up a small mercury spill
1. 4-5 ziplock-type bags
2. trash bags (2 to 6 mils thick)
3. rubber, nitrile or latex gloves
4. paper towels
5. cardboard or squeegee
6. eyedropper
7. duct tape, or shaving cream and small paint brush
8. flashlight
9. powdered sulfur (optional)
Cleanup Instructions
1. Put on rubber, nitrile or latex gloves.
2. If there are any broken pieces of glass or sharp objects, pick them up with care. Place all broken objects on a paper towel. Fold the paper towel and place in a zip lock bag. Secure the bag and label it as directed by your local health or fire department.
3. Locate visible mercury beads. Use a squeegee or cardboard to gather mercury beads. Use slow sweeping motions to keep mercury from becoming uncontrollable. Take a flashlight, hold it at a low angle close to the floor in a darkened room and look for additional glistening beads of mercury that may be sticking to the surface or in small cracked areas of the surface. Note: Mercury can move surprising distances on hard-flat surfaces, so be sure to inspect the entire room when "searching."
4. Use the eyedropper to collect or draw up the mercury beads. Slowly and carefully squeeze mercury onto a damp paper towel. Place the paper towel in a zip lock bag and secure. Make sure to label the bag as directed by your local health or fire department.
5. After you remove larger beads, put shaving cream on top of small paint brush and gently "dot" the affected area to pick up smaller hard-to-see beads. Alternatively, use duct tape to collect smaller hard-to-see beads. Place the paint brush or duct tape in a zip lock bag and secure. Make sure to label the bag as directed by your local health or fire department.
6. OPTIONAL STEP: It is OPTIONAL to use commercially available powdered sulfur to absorb the beads that are too small to see. The sulfur does two things: (1) it makes the mercury easier to see since there may be a color change from yellow to brown and (2) it binds the mercury so that it can be easily removed and suppresses the vapor of any missing mercury. Where to get commercialized sulfur? It may be supplied as mercury vapor absorbent in mercury spill kits, which can be purchased from laboratory, chemical supply and hazardous materials response supply manufacturers.
Note: Powdered sulfur may stain fabrics a dark color. When using powdered sulfur, do not breathe in the powder as it can be moderately toxic. Additionally, users should read and understand product information before use.
7. If you choose not to use this option, you may want to request the services of a contractor who has monitoring equipment to screen for mercury vapors. Consult your local environmental or health agency to inquire about contractors in your area. Place all materials used with the cleanup, including gloves, in a trash bag. Place all mercury beads and objects into the trash bag. Secure trash bag and label it as directed by your local health or fire department.
8. Contact your local health department, municipal waste authority or your local fire department for proper disposal in accordance with local, state and federal laws.
9. Remember to keep the area well ventilated to the outside (i.e., windows open and fans in exterior windows running) for at least 24 hours after your successful cleanup. Continue to keep pets and children out of cleanup area. If sickness occurs, seek medical attention immediately. View information on health effects related to exposures to vapors from metallic mercury. For additional information on health effects, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) provides a Mercury Fact Sheet that also presents information on health effects related to exposures to vapors from metallic mercury.
Recommendation: If there are young children or pregnant women in the house, seek additional advice from your local or state health or state environmental agency.
Read more:
• Have everyone else leave the area; don't let anyone walk through the mercury on their way out. Make sure all pets are removed from the area. Open all windows and doors to the outside; shut all doors to other parts of the house.
• DO NOT allow children to help you clean up the spill.
• Mercury can be cleaned up easily from the following surfaces: wood, linoleum, tile and any similarly smooth surfaces.
• If a spill occurs on carpet, curtains, upholstery or other absorbent surfaces, these contaminated items should be thrown away in accordance with the disposal means outlined below. Only cut and remove the affected portion of the contaminated carpet for disposal.
Items needed to clean up a small mercury spill
1. 4-5 ziplock-type bags
2. trash bags (2 to 6 mils thick)
3. rubber, nitrile or latex gloves
4. paper towels
5. cardboard or squeegee
6. eyedropper
7. duct tape, or shaving cream and small paint brush
8. flashlight
9. powdered sulfur (optional)
Cleanup Instructions
1. Put on rubber, nitrile or latex gloves.
2. If there are any broken pieces of glass or sharp objects, pick them up with care. Place all broken objects on a paper towel. Fold the paper towel and place in a zip lock bag. Secure the bag and label it as directed by your local health or fire department.
3. Locate visible mercury beads. Use a squeegee or cardboard to gather mercury beads. Use slow sweeping motions to keep mercury from becoming uncontrollable. Take a flashlight, hold it at a low angle close to the floor in a darkened room and look for additional glistening beads of mercury that may be sticking to the surface or in small cracked areas of the surface. Note: Mercury can move surprising distances on hard-flat surfaces, so be sure to inspect the entire room when "searching."
4. Use the eyedropper to collect or draw up the mercury beads. Slowly and carefully squeeze mercury onto a damp paper towel. Place the paper towel in a zip lock bag and secure. Make sure to label the bag as directed by your local health or fire department.
5. After you remove larger beads, put shaving cream on top of small paint brush and gently "dot" the affected area to pick up smaller hard-to-see beads. Alternatively, use duct tape to collect smaller hard-to-see beads. Place the paint brush or duct tape in a zip lock bag and secure. Make sure to label the bag as directed by your local health or fire department.
6. OPTIONAL STEP: It is OPTIONAL to use commercially available powdered sulfur to absorb the beads that are too small to see. The sulfur does two things: (1) it makes the mercury easier to see since there may be a color change from yellow to brown and (2) it binds the mercury so that it can be easily removed and suppresses the vapor of any missing mercury. Where to get commercialized sulfur? It may be supplied as mercury vapor absorbent in mercury spill kits, which can be purchased from laboratory, chemical supply and hazardous materials response supply manufacturers.
Note: Powdered sulfur may stain fabrics a dark color. When using powdered sulfur, do not breathe in the powder as it can be moderately toxic. Additionally, users should read and understand product information before use.
7. If you choose not to use this option, you may want to request the services of a contractor who has monitoring equipment to screen for mercury vapors. Consult your local environmental or health agency to inquire about contractors in your area. Place all materials used with the cleanup, including gloves, in a trash bag. Place all mercury beads and objects into the trash bag. Secure trash bag and label it as directed by your local health or fire department.
8. Contact your local health department, municipal waste authority or your local fire department for proper disposal in accordance with local, state and federal laws.
9. Remember to keep the area well ventilated to the outside (i.e., windows open and fans in exterior windows running) for at least 24 hours after your successful cleanup. Continue to keep pets and children out of cleanup area. If sickness occurs, seek medical attention immediately. View information on health effects related to exposures to vapors from metallic mercury. For additional information on health effects, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) provides a Mercury Fact Sheet that also presents information on health effects related to exposures to vapors from metallic mercury.
Recommendation: If there are young children or pregnant women in the house, seek additional advice from your local or state health or state environmental agency.
Read more:
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Google Builds First US Off-Shore Superhighway for Clean Energy!
October 12, 2010
Susan Kraemer
Some very exciting news for US clean energy today.
Google announced on their blog last night that they will invest in a project to build 350 miles of transmission off the Atlantic coast from New Jersey to Virginia to tap into gigantic off-shore wind potential that we are only just beginning to tap into — the first-ever US approval of an off-shore wind farm, by the Obama administration, was just this year.
The new transmission cables, a superhighway for clean energy, will enable the connection of up to 6,000 MW of offshore wind turbines. That’s equivalent to 60% of the wind energy that was installed in the entire country last year and enough to serve approximately 1.9 million households.
Putting this system in place removes a major barrier to offshore wind energy in the US: lack of infrastructure.
And it should — with a friendly administration — jump-start off-shore wind in this country.
Google’s new superhighway of energy will be built by transmission company Trans-Elect and be financed by Google, Good Energies and Marubeni Corporation.
Google points out in their blog that just a beginning is needed at this early stage. “We are investing 37.5% of the equity in this initial development stage, with the goal of obtaining all the necessary approvals to finance and begin constructing the line. Although the development stage requires only a small part of the total estimated project budget, it represents a critical stage for the project.”
These four mid-Atlantic states that Google proposes to get started with have more than 60 GW (60,000 MW) of this gigantic off-shore wind potential in relatively shallow waters that extend miles out to sea, making it easier to install turbines 10-15 miles offshore, where they are barely visible.
This is a historic milestone for the USA. Total off-shore wind power off the Atlantic has been estimated to be enough to take one third of the US population off the fossil grid.
Read more:
http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/12/google-builds-first-us-off-shore-superhighway-for-clean-energy/
Susan Kraemer
Some very exciting news for US clean energy today.
Google announced on their blog last night that they will invest in a project to build 350 miles of transmission off the Atlantic coast from New Jersey to Virginia to tap into gigantic off-shore wind potential that we are only just beginning to tap into — the first-ever US approval of an off-shore wind farm, by the Obama administration, was just this year.
The new transmission cables, a superhighway for clean energy, will enable the connection of up to 6,000 MW of offshore wind turbines. That’s equivalent to 60% of the wind energy that was installed in the entire country last year and enough to serve approximately 1.9 million households.
Putting this system in place removes a major barrier to offshore wind energy in the US: lack of infrastructure.
And it should — with a friendly administration — jump-start off-shore wind in this country.
Google’s new superhighway of energy will be built by transmission company Trans-Elect and be financed by Google, Good Energies and Marubeni Corporation.
Google points out in their blog that just a beginning is needed at this early stage. “We are investing 37.5% of the equity in this initial development stage, with the goal of obtaining all the necessary approvals to finance and begin constructing the line. Although the development stage requires only a small part of the total estimated project budget, it represents a critical stage for the project.”
These four mid-Atlantic states that Google proposes to get started with have more than 60 GW (60,000 MW) of this gigantic off-shore wind potential in relatively shallow waters that extend miles out to sea, making it easier to install turbines 10-15 miles offshore, where they are barely visible.
This is a historic milestone for the USA. Total off-shore wind power off the Atlantic has been estimated to be enough to take one third of the US population off the fossil grid.
Read more:
http://cleantechnica.com/2010/10/12/google-builds-first-us-off-shore-superhighway-for-clean-energy/
Friday, October 15, 2010
Kay Slaughter honored for efforts to help the bay
By Daily Progress Staff Reports
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation has named Kay E. Slaughter, a senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, the 2010 Virginia Conservationist of the Year.
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation has named Kay E. Slaughter, a senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, the 2010 Virginia Conservationist of the Year.
Slaughter recently retired from the SELC after 24 years of advocating for natural resource protection throughout Virginia and the southeastern United States, according to the foundation.
The SELC is based in Charlottesville.
Slaughter played an active role in many of the state’s most important environmental issues, including the battle against the construction of the King William Reservoir, according to the foundation. Newport News officials decided a year ago, according to The Virginian-Pilot, not to build a massive reservoir in King William County that would have destroyed 403 acres of wetlands.
Slaughter also led the fight to change Virginia laws to allow citizens to challenge polluters, the foundation stated.
The conservationist award is the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s top honor.
Read more:
http://www2.dailyprogress.com/news/2010/oct/05/slaughter-honored-efforts-help-bay-ar-544751/
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Students learning to save planet: Green program aims to inspire creative fixes to real issues
Ninth-graders in the Projects in Emerging Technologies class at Martinsville High School listen to Jeff Joyce (far left), Martinsville’s assistant director of public works. Joyce discussed the flare system at the city’s former landfill on Tuesday. The students were there as part of a “Going Green” program at MHS that helps prepare students to tackle environmental problems. (Contributed photo by Kim Barton)
Thursday, October 7, 2010
By ELIZA WINSTON - Bulletin Staff Writer
Students in a grant-funded program at Martinsville High School are spending this semester learning all they can about environmental problems that affect the community — and in just a few months, they’ll be trying to solve them.
More than 80 ninth-graders in a year-long career and technical education course called Projects in Emerging Technologies are the first students at the school to take part in the program, called “Going Green.” Funded by a $24,100 Learn and Serve Virginia grant, the program is designed to promote the use of classroom learning to solve real-life problems in communities.
Martinsville High is one of 12 schools statewide to receive the grant.
Later this school year, the students will identify an environmental issue at the school or in the community and work together to implement a solution using grant funds, according to a news release. The projects could address topics such as waste management, recycling, biofuels or alternative energy.
Before they can tackle their projects, the freshmen have to learn what environmental issues affect the city and the school, and what is being done about them.
Tom Fitzgibbons, director of advanced and special programming for the city schools, said students will go on field trips, do research, hear guest speakers and hold class discussions to explore how environmental issues affect the community.
On Tuesday, students visited the closed city landfill off Clearview Drive and learned about its economic and environmental effect on the community. Jeff Joyce, assistant public works director for the city, told the students that the landfill held the city’s waste from 1920 to 2005.
In that period, 1.6 million tons of waste filled the site’s 42 acres, Joyce said.
“There is a whole lot of garbage in here,” he said.
When the landfill was open, it generated $2.5 million in revenue for the city, Joyce told the students. However, once it filled up and was closed, the city had to begin transporting waste to a landfill elsewhere.
Revenue was lost, and the city now must spend money to monitor the facility, Joyce said.
Last year, the city began collecting and burning methane emissions released by the decaying garbage through the landfill’s flare system, Joyce said.
That system turns methane gas into carbon dioxide, which is 20 percent less harmful than methane, Joyce said. He told the students there is a “big market” for environmental and civil engineers who design and build systems such as the landfill’s flare system.
While the old landfill cannot be used as land for buildings, it could be used to generate energy if solar panels were placed on the land, Joyce said.
Among the speakers scheduled to address the class is Larry McDorman, who will talk next week about his tire burning plant in Ridgeway. McDorman has a patented process to burn tires at high temperatures, and the only thing they release is steam, Fitzgibbons said.
McDorman’s talk will introduce students to entrepreneurship, Fitzgibbons added.
The following week, Creative Recycling, a Greensboro, N.C., company that recycles technology materials, will speak to the students, he said. Also, EMI Recycling in Bassett will visit the school to do a presentation about basic recycling.
Fitzgibbons said he hopes the speakers will “spur some ideas” for projects in the second semester.
The grant is renewable for three years pending available funds and satisfactory progress toward goals, the release said. If the school participates again next year, the students will have the opportunity to continue studying alternative energy and related projects as sophomores, and then they can participate in “green” internships in their junior and senior years.
A new group of ninth-graders will begin the cycle each year.
Read more:
http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/article.cfm?ID=25584
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Group seeks proposals for socioeconomic uranium study
Just a Puff
By TARA BOZICK
Published: September 30, 2010
The Uranium Mining Subcommittee of the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission is asking for proposals from interested firms or organizations to conduct a socioeconomic study on the impacts of uranium mining for the region surrounding Coles Hill in Pittsylvania County, announced subcommittee Chair Delegate R. Lee Ware Jr. in a news release Thursday.
A grant not to exceed $200,000 from the Virginia Tobacco Commission is paying for the socioeconomic study, which should be completed by Dec. 1, 2011, according to the request for proposals. The deadline for submitting proposals is 5 p.m. on Nov. 15.
The study will determine what impacts — “real or perceived” — uranium mining and milling operations will have on the quality of life and economic well-being of the region, according to the request.
These studies will help the commission form its recommendation for policy on uranium mining and milling in Virginia. The commission began studying uranium mining issues in the 1980s after uranium was found in Pittsylvania County.
Now, Virginia Uranium Inc. seeks to mine and mill the 119-million-pound uranium ore deposit at Coles Hill. Yet, Virginia has had a moratorium on uranium mining since 1982.
Katherine Mull, executive director of the Dan River Basin Association, said the statement of purpose of the socioeconomic study could have been more detailed. She said issues surrounding long-term tailings and radioactive waste management are more of a concern for her than the impacts of active mining and milling.
Mull would like to know what impact the presence of wastes have on the region’s ability to attract new investment and diversify the economy.
She said perception matters because people already tell her they won’t live downstream of dams.
“In a general level, it does cover a good, wide range of concerns,” Mull said. “I would be as detailed on the social impacts as on the economic development impacts.”
To see the request for proposals and news release, visit http://dls.state.va.us/groups/cec/Uranium/RFP.htm
The study will address these issues, “at a minimum”:
Economic development: jobs and revenue created directly and indirectly, number of jobs to be filled by current residents, jobs that might be lost from closure of existing businesses, impact on local and state tax revenues, impact on real estate values and impact on jobs and revenue after active mining ends
Government services and regulation: costs for regulation and monitoring of mining, milling, tailings management, closure and “aftercare;” costs of infrastructure and services upgrades; impact on school funding; costs for contingency planning and disaster preparedness; potential costs to localities upstream and downstream; potential costs and “determination of parties responsible for remediating any potential environmental damage” and sources of funding to offset costs
Public health and environment: costs of health care and illness from potential negative impacts; quality of life impact from health risks and environmental consequences; impact on recreation and tourism; review of any environmental justice impacts and review of post-closure procedures to ensure public heath and safety
Social impacts: image of the region; public confidence in ability to control adverse effects, private schools and local institutions and overall aesthetics and quality of life
Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2010/sep/30/group-seeks-proposals-socioeconomic-uranium-study-ar-535139/
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Groups promote wind energy at Va. Beach event
VIRGINIA BEACH
Eileen Levandoski watched Sunday as propellers were tacked onto three mock wind turbines in Neptune's Park at the Oceanfront. Each stood about 6 feet tall - models made of plywood and plastic piping driven into the sand.
"Now let's get 120 more of them offshore," she said.
Levandoski works for the Sierra Club, which along with the group Oceana and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, hoped the beachfront turbines would drum up awareness about wind energy.
The event was Hampton Roads' part of an international day of demonstrations called Global Work Party organized by 350.org, a climate change organization.
More than 7,000 events were planned in more than 100 countries, including tree plantings in Afghanistan and clean energy competitions in India and China, according to a news release.
Here, the issue was wind energy.
Buzz has been building over the past few years about the possibilities wind energy holds for Hampton Roads. Two energy companies have submitted proposals to lease space for wind farms 12 to 25 miles off Virginia Beach, and the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium has said wind farms could create up to 11,600 jobs within 20 years.
The turbines would bring jobs to Hampton Roads, provide a clean alternative to fossil fuels and, most importantly, cancel calls for off shore drilling, they said.
"It is going to be our replacement fuel," said Levandoski, who lives in Virginia Beach. "It's not science fiction."
Roxy Carter, a campaign organizer for the conservation organization Oceana, said 83 percent of Virginia's energy could come from wind.
As the sun beat down, just a few people broke away from their sunbathing to ask about the wind turbines.
Cecilia Schein lives in a solar-powered house in Norfolk and said she favors wind farms.
Source URL (retrieved on 10/11/2010 - 19:15): http://hamptonroads.com/2010/10/groups-promote-wind-energy-va-beach-event
Eileen Levandoski watched Sunday as propellers were tacked onto three mock wind turbines in Neptune's Park at the Oceanfront. Each stood about 6 feet tall - models made of plywood and plastic piping driven into the sand.
"Now let's get 120 more of them offshore," she said.
Levandoski works for the Sierra Club, which along with the group Oceana and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, hoped the beachfront turbines would drum up awareness about wind energy.
The event was Hampton Roads' part of an international day of demonstrations called Global Work Party organized by 350.org, a climate change organization.
More than 7,000 events were planned in more than 100 countries, including tree plantings in Afghanistan and clean energy competitions in India and China, according to a news release.
Here, the issue was wind energy.
Buzz has been building over the past few years about the possibilities wind energy holds for Hampton Roads. Two energy companies have submitted proposals to lease space for wind farms 12 to 25 miles off Virginia Beach, and the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium has said wind farms could create up to 11,600 jobs within 20 years.
The turbines would bring jobs to Hampton Roads, provide a clean alternative to fossil fuels and, most importantly, cancel calls for off shore drilling, they said.
"It is going to be our replacement fuel," said Levandoski, who lives in Virginia Beach. "It's not science fiction."
Roxy Carter, a campaign organizer for the conservation organization Oceana, said 83 percent of Virginia's energy could come from wind.
As the sun beat down, just a few people broke away from their sunbathing to ask about the wind turbines.
Cecilia Schein lives in a solar-powered house in Norfolk and said she favors wind farms.
Source URL (retrieved on 10/11/2010 - 19:15): http://hamptonroads.com/2010/10/groups-promote-wind-energy-va-beach-event
Monday, October 11, 2010
Watershed Academy Webcast Seminars: Webcast on Wed. Oct. 13, 2010
EPA's Watershed Academy is pleased to sponsor free webcast seminars. Local watershed organizations, municipal leaders, and others are invited to sign up for these free, on-line webcast training sessions.
Webcasts are typically conducted on an approximately monthly basis, on Wednesdays at 1:00pm to 3:00pm EST. Attendees must register in advance to participate in webcasts. During the webcasts, trainees log onto the Web to participate in live training conducted by expert instructors.
Your computer must have the capability of playing sound in order to attend the webcasts.
In advance of webcasts, we post PDF copies of the PowerPoint slides in the yellow box for those that want to print them out. The Watershed Academy is also now offering a certificate to those that attend webcasts. For those that are not able to register for a webcast, a streaming audio version of the training will be made available after the live seminar (see links to previous webcasts below).
EPA's Watershed Academy is pleased to sponsor its 53rd free webcast Seminar.
Webcast on Wed. Oct. 13, 2010
"EPA's Healthy Watershed Initiative: Protecting Our High Quality Waters and Watersheds"
by Laura Gabanski, Healthy Watersheds Initiative Lead, U.S. EPA's Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Rick Hill Planning and Policy Manager, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, and Stephen Stanley, Project Manager, Puget Sound Characterization Project, Washington Department of Ecology SEA Program
Join us for this exciting Webcast on the new Healthy Watersheds Initiative. While most EPA water quality programs have focused on restoring impaired waters, the new Healthy Watersheds Initiative encourages states, local governments, watershed organizations and others to protect and maintain healthy waterbodies as well.
Healthy watersheds provide our communities with drinking water, recreational opportunities, environmental benefits and services, including clean water for healthy aquatic ecosystems, habitat for fish and wildlife, and better resilience against storms and floods, climate change and future land use changes. Protecting healthy watersheds will result in considerable savings over time if the need for costly restoration can be avoided in watersheds that would otherwise become impaired by cumulative impacts of multiple stressors. Join us for this Webcast to learn what tools EPA is developing to help promote Healthy Watersheds and to hear about what several states are doing to protect their healthy watersheds.
Webcast participants are eligible to receive a certificate for their attendance. Participants are encouraged to download presentations prior to the webcast at Watershed Academy Webcast Seminars.
2.0 hour audio Web broadcast
Eastern: 1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Mountain: 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.Central: 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Pacific: 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 Noon
Flyer on Watershed Academy Webcasts (PDF), Dec. 2006, EPA 841-K-06-001, (2 pp, 798K, About PDF). Copies of this free flyer may be ordered from National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP) at 513-489-8190 or 800-490-9198 or send an email to nscep@bps-lmit.com
Read more:
http://water.epa.gov/learn/training/wacademy/webcasts_index.cfm
Webcasts are typically conducted on an approximately monthly basis, on Wednesdays at 1:00pm to 3:00pm EST. Attendees must register in advance to participate in webcasts. During the webcasts, trainees log onto the Web to participate in live training conducted by expert instructors.
Your computer must have the capability of playing sound in order to attend the webcasts.
In advance of webcasts, we post PDF copies of the PowerPoint slides in the yellow box for those that want to print them out. The Watershed Academy is also now offering a certificate to those that attend webcasts. For those that are not able to register for a webcast, a streaming audio version of the training will be made available after the live seminar (see links to previous webcasts below).
EPA's Watershed Academy is pleased to sponsor its 53rd free webcast Seminar.
Webcast on Wed. Oct. 13, 2010
"EPA's Healthy Watershed Initiative: Protecting Our High Quality Waters and Watersheds"
by Laura Gabanski, Healthy Watersheds Initiative Lead, U.S. EPA's Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Rick Hill Planning and Policy Manager, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, and Stephen Stanley, Project Manager, Puget Sound Characterization Project, Washington Department of Ecology SEA Program
Join us for this exciting Webcast on the new Healthy Watersheds Initiative. While most EPA water quality programs have focused on restoring impaired waters, the new Healthy Watersheds Initiative encourages states, local governments, watershed organizations and others to protect and maintain healthy waterbodies as well.
Healthy watersheds provide our communities with drinking water, recreational opportunities, environmental benefits and services, including clean water for healthy aquatic ecosystems, habitat for fish and wildlife, and better resilience against storms and floods, climate change and future land use changes. Protecting healthy watersheds will result in considerable savings over time if the need for costly restoration can be avoided in watersheds that would otherwise become impaired by cumulative impacts of multiple stressors. Join us for this Webcast to learn what tools EPA is developing to help promote Healthy Watersheds and to hear about what several states are doing to protect their healthy watersheds.
Webcast participants are eligible to receive a certificate for their attendance. Participants are encouraged to download presentations prior to the webcast at Watershed Academy Webcast Seminars.
2.0 hour audio Web broadcast
Eastern: 1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Mountain: 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.Central: 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Pacific: 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 Noon
Flyer on Watershed Academy Webcasts (PDF), Dec. 2006, EPA 841-K-06-001, (2 pp, 798K, About PDF). Copies of this free flyer may be ordered from National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP) at 513-489-8190 or 800-490-9198 or send an email to nscep@bps-lmit.com
Read more:
http://water.epa.gov/learn/training/wacademy/webcasts_index.cfm
Saturday, October 9, 2010
Bokan Mountain Uranium Exploration : Things You Should Know
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
September 2008
Landmark Alaska Limited Partnership, the American subsidiary of Vancouver-based U-Core, is interested in establishing a uranium and rare metal mine at the site of the contaminated Ross Adams Mine on Bokan Mountain, which was abandoned in 1971. The site is located 35 miles across Clarence Strait from Ketchikan on the southwest flank of Bokan Mountain in the Kendrick Creek watershed on Prince of Wales Island adjacent to a classified salmon stream.
Location of Prospect in Southeast Alaska
The area is currently used for commercial fishing for salmon, shrimp, sea cucumber and red urchin, guided fishing, guided hiking, wildlife viewing and guided and recreational hunting.1 U-Core has already spent $4 million on exploration and hope to begin ermitting and construction by 2011.2
What are the current conditions of the mine site?
The wastes from the abandoned Ross Adams Mine are toxic and should be removed under federal law.
Radiation levels around the waste rock dumps from the old mine are 2-100 times greater than average levels for the region. The mine site also contains higher than average levels of carcinogenic radon gas, arsenic and lead that have polluted both the air and surface water. Surface water contamination concerns extend 15 miles
downstream and into Kendrick Bay from the waste rock dumps – an area which includes 18 spawning stream deltas for coho, sockeye, pink and chum salmon. Inside the mine, levels of radon gas are 50-125 times the upper limit of safe indoor exposure levels.3
Location of Bokan Prospect in relation to Ketchikan
What are the plans for the site?
Right now, U-core is exploring in order to establish the total amount of accessible uranium and rare earth metals that remain at the Bokan Mountain site. Once exploration is complete, they will decide whether the remaining ore is profitable and then apply for mining permits and establish the infrastructure necessary for an active mine.4
Therefore, large amounts of ore rock must be removed in order to get substantial amounts of uranium ore, which necessitates a large landscape disturbance.
The waste rock from these removals generally does not have enough uranium ore to be profitable, but is still radioactive. The necessary disposal of more waste rock at the site increases the risk of greater levels of radiation and other pollutant contamination.5
Once the ore-containing rock is mined, it is generally milled off-site. Representatives of U-core have mentioned the possibility of a ‘concentration facility’ at the mine site.6 Concentration of uranium ore involves large amounts of water and acid. If this would occur at the Bokan Mountain site, it would increase risk for acid, lead and mercury contamination of surface water.
Jobs
U-core has also claimed that the Bokan Mountain mine would employ 1,000 people in direct jobs.7
The different uranium mining methods require differing numbers of workers, but the McCarthur River and Key Lake combined operation, the largest known deposit of high-grade uranium ore in the world with 349 million pounds of proven and probable uranium ore, currently employs 750 people.8 How big would Bokan be?
Problems with Radiation
Radiation causes cancer Radiation, the bursts of particles and energy from radioactive elements such as uranium and radon gas, causes cancer by altering the DNA pattern in body cells.
Radon is the second-leading cause of lung cancer after smoking. Cancer risks increase with the sustained levels of radiation experienced by both mine workers and people who live near mine wastes. In fact, uranium mine workers have 2-5 times the risk of cancer as the general population.9
Historically, uranium mining has caused even higher rates of cancer. Almost half the local workers at a uranium mine near Great Slave Lake in Canada died of cancer within 30 years of the mine closing in 1965. Because of the characteristics of the disease, cancer caused by radiation usually does not occur until 20-30 years after radiation exposure.10
People living near uranium wastes are also at high risk for cancer. On Navajo lands in the American Southwest, where uranium mining was rampant from the 1940’s through the 1980’s, the overall cancer rate doubled within a period of 20 years. Diagnoses of stomach cancer were 15 times the national average for people who lived near mine wastes. Even more disturbingly, stomach cancer rates were 200 times the national average for women between the ages of 20 and 40.11
Toxic lead and arsenic also contaminate the Bokan mine site. High levels of lead can cause birth defects, nervous and circulatory problems and cancer. At high levels of exposure, arsenic causes death through multi-system organ failure. At lower levels, it has been linked to increased rates of cancer.12
Because of these dangerous health effects, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Nunavut and Labrador, Queensland, Western Australia and the Navajo Nation have all banned uranium mining.
What about fish and wildlife in the area?
The Bokan Mountain area is of economic value for commercial fishing and guided and recreational hunting. Unfortunately, 18 spawning stream deltas for coho, sockeye, pink and chum salmon occur within the area of surface water contamination concern.
Moreover, 16 watersheds fall within the area of the 4 mile radius of air contamination concern.13 Because animal’s bodies function in similar ways to our own bodies, radiation, radon, lead and arsenic affect wildlife in much the same way they affect humans.
Scientific studies have also shown that fish hatched earlier and had higher embryo ortality when exposed to waters affected by a uranium mine than when exposed to control waters.14 The sustained consumption of large amounts of the meat and organs of animals that had eaten contaminate vegetation radiation has been linked to a higher than average risk for cancer.15
What you can do!
- Talk to your neighbors about the dangers of uranium mining in your backyard
- Check online for more information about Uranium Mining. Try the EPA website at http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/index.html
1 – Kent and Sullivan. 2004. “2004 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report: Ross Adams Uranium Mine, Prince of Wales Island, Alaska.” Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region.
2 – Bowlen, Scott. 2008. “POW mine venture continues.” Ketchikan Daily News. Vol 80 No 192. 15 August 2008.
3 - Kent and Sullivan. 2004.
4 - Bowlen, Scott. 2008.
5 – “Uranium Mining and Milling. http://www.anawa.org.au/mining/index.html.Accessed 9/17/08.
6 - Bowlen, Scott. 2008.
7 – Ibid
8 – “Summary: McCarthur River.”. http://cameco.com/operations/uranium/mcarthur_river/ Accessed 9/17/08.
9 - C. Stephens and M. Ahern, 2001. “Worker and Community Health Impacts Related to Mining Operations Internationally: A Rapid Review of the Literature http://www.iied.org /mmsd/mmsd_pdfs/worker_community_health_impacts _literature_review.pdf
Accessed 9/15/08.
10 – “Impact of Uranium Mining on Indigenous Workers in Canada’s Northwest Territories.” Arctic Circle. http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/SEEJ/Mining/. Accessed 9/18/08
11 – Pasternak, Judy. 2006. “A Peril that dwelt among the Navajos.” The Los Angeles Times. 19 November 2006.. http://www.latimes.com/news/ nationworld/nation/la-na-navajo
19nov19 ,0,4003854,full.story Accessed 9/18/08
12 – “Arsenic.” United States Environmental ProtectionAgency
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/arsenic/index.html. Accessed September 18, 2008.
13 - Kent and Sullivan. 2004.
14 - Pyle, Swanson and Lehmkuhl. 2002. “Toxicity of uranium mine receiving waters to early life stage flathead minnows.” Environmental Pollution. 166 (2): 243-255.
15 – Thomas, P. and T. Gates 1999 “Radionuclides in the Lichen–Caribou–Human Food Chain near Uranium Mining Operations in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada,” Environmental Health Perspectives 107: 527–537.
Scientific studies have also shown that fish hatched earlier and had higher embryo ortality when exposed to waters affected by a uranium mine than when exposed to control waters.14 The sustained consumption of large amounts of the meat and organs of animals that had eaten contaminate vegetation radiation has been linked to a higher than average risk for cancer.15
Read more:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oHfgAQRCgk0J:seacc.org/issues/mining/bokanmtnfactsheet.pdf+uranium+mining+fishing&hl=en&gl=us
Friday, October 8, 2010
White House Goes Solar
Author: Curtis Silver
Published: October 05, 2010 at 5:52 pm
Way back in 1979 then President Jimmy Carter spent $30,000 to install a solar water-heating system for the West Wing offices. Then during his term, President Bush installed solar panels to power the maintenance building and some of the mansion, and of course - to heat the water in the pool.
President Obama is the latest to "lead by example" in looking to install even more solar panels to power the White House's living quarters, as well as the water heaters.
The White House is under increasing pressure to show how green they are, considering the current climate change issues.
While Carter's solar panels were removed in 1986, they were far from gone as some activists carted them all the way to Washington, D.C. to pressure the White House to go solar. It's a surprise that it has taken this long for the White House to go solar when so many homes across the nation (if they can afford it) are making the switch.
Solar power is clean, quick and efficient.
This is a great example for the American people in using clean energy.
Read more: http://technorati.com/politics/article/white-house-goes-solar/#ixzz11XSA6K48
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Virginia Governor Announces Sales Tax Holiday on Energy Star and WaterSense Products
September 27, 2010
by admin
Governor Bob McDonnell today announced Virginia’s fourth Energy Star and WaterSense products sales tax holiday will begin Friday, October 8th and continue through Monday, October 11th. During the holiday, consumers can purchase a variety of “Green” products qualified for energy savings by the federal government and not pay the 5% state and local sales tax.
The products must cost $2,500 or less each and be purchased for noncommercial or personal use.
The Energy Star products include many larger items, including air conditioners, refrigerators, dishwashers, ceiling fans, and washing machines, as well as compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) and programmable thermostats. WaterSense-labeled bathroom sink faucets, faucet accessories, and toilets will also be tax-exempt, along with new items added to the list this year such as showerheads. The sales tax exemption also applies to purchases of used Energy Star and WaterSense items that qualify.
Speaking about the sales tax holiday, Governor McDonnell commented, “We all need to do our part to use energy more wisely and conserve our natural resources. During this sales tax holiday I encourage Virginians to invest in Energy Star and WaterSense products, which are designed to reduce energy and waste. Buying energy-efficient appliances is a smart investment, saving consumers money on their utility bills and conserving energy.”
The Department of Taxation has posted guidelines, frequently asked questions, and a list of approved Energy Star and WaterSense items on its Web site at www.tax.virginia.gov.
Online purchases of qualifying Energy Star and WaterSense products will also be exempt from the sales tax as long as the orders are placed during the exemption period and the sellers have the items available for immediate shipment.
In addition to exempting certain Energy Star and WaterSense products from the sales tax during the tax holiday, retailers may also choose to “absorb,” or pay themselves, the sales tax on any nonexempt merchandise they sell. Retailers who voluntarily absorb the sales tax must pay the tax themselves to the Tax Department.
http://www.clarkedailynews.com/virginia-governor-announces-sales-tax-holiday-on-energy-star-and-watersense-products/12913/
by admin
Governor Bob McDonnell today announced Virginia’s fourth Energy Star and WaterSense products sales tax holiday will begin Friday, October 8th and continue through Monday, October 11th. During the holiday, consumers can purchase a variety of “Green” products qualified for energy savings by the federal government and not pay the 5% state and local sales tax.
The products must cost $2,500 or less each and be purchased for noncommercial or personal use.
The Energy Star products include many larger items, including air conditioners, refrigerators, dishwashers, ceiling fans, and washing machines, as well as compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) and programmable thermostats. WaterSense-labeled bathroom sink faucets, faucet accessories, and toilets will also be tax-exempt, along with new items added to the list this year such as showerheads. The sales tax exemption also applies to purchases of used Energy Star and WaterSense items that qualify.
Speaking about the sales tax holiday, Governor McDonnell commented, “We all need to do our part to use energy more wisely and conserve our natural resources. During this sales tax holiday I encourage Virginians to invest in Energy Star and WaterSense products, which are designed to reduce energy and waste. Buying energy-efficient appliances is a smart investment, saving consumers money on their utility bills and conserving energy.”
The Department of Taxation has posted guidelines, frequently asked questions, and a list of approved Energy Star and WaterSense items on its Web site at www.tax.virginia.gov.
Online purchases of qualifying Energy Star and WaterSense products will also be exempt from the sales tax as long as the orders are placed during the exemption period and the sellers have the items available for immediate shipment.
In addition to exempting certain Energy Star and WaterSense products from the sales tax during the tax holiday, retailers may also choose to “absorb,” or pay themselves, the sales tax on any nonexempt merchandise they sell. Retailers who voluntarily absorb the sales tax must pay the tax themselves to the Tax Department.
http://www.clarkedailynews.com/virginia-governor-announces-sales-tax-holiday-on-energy-star-and-watersense-products/12913/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















