Sunday, January 31, 2010
Clean Energy Week Showcases Urgent Need for Clean Energy Jobs, Energy Efficiency and Climate Solutions
Week of February 1 - 5, 2010 -- Washington, DC
Organizations nationwide are joining together to maximize efforts to move clean energy to the forefront of national policy. Officially declaring February 1-5, 2010 as Clean Energy Week, a growing list of partners are working together to produce a high-impact week of powerful and effective activities and events.
Clean Energy Week is a week of action on the part of NGOs, non-profits, associations, private corporations, and government agencies that consists of breakfasts, lunches, dinners, receptions, workshops, press conferences, rallies and outreach activities on Capitol Hill and across Washington, DC.
The week is focused on the national imperative to enact comprehensive clean energy policy - including climate solutions, renewable energy and energy efficiency programs - as a means of creating vast numbers of new jobs, ensuring U.S. global leadership in the emerging clean energy era, enhancing our security and preserving our planet for the generations to follow.The primary objectives of Clean Energy Week are:
Engage Congress and the Administration to take action on climate solutions, renewable energy, and energy efficiency, which remain top priorities for the American people and are essential components of job creation and economic growth;
Educate industry and government on practical applications for clean energy that are economically viable, will create jobs, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and strengthen national security; and
Encourage investment in clean energy technologies.
Click here: http://www.cleanenergyweek.org/index.html
for a list of Clean Energy Week events.
Saturday, January 30, 2010
BULLETIN - EA, S ACTIVATION REQUESTED, FLOOD WARNING, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BLACKSBURG VA, 1200 PM EST MON JAN 25 2010 (areas at and around proposed uranium mining)
Comment: More flooding around Coles Hill but remember if the ban is lifted, uranium mining will be all over our county and the State of Virginia! So flooding happened in the valleys, east of the Blue Ridge and parts of the mountains!
000
WGUS41 KRNK 251700
FLWRNK
BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
FLOOD WARNING
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BLACKSBURG VA
1200 PM EST MON JAN 25 2010
VAC031-143-252100-
/O.NEW.KRNK.FA.W.0024.100125T1700Z-100125T2100Z/
/00000.0.ER.000000T0000Z.000000T0000Z.000000T0000Z.OO/
CAMPBELL VA-PITTSYLVANIA VA-
1200 PM EST MON JAN 25 2010
THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BLACKSBURG HAS ISSUED A
* FLOOD WARNING FOR CONTINUED FLOODING IN...
CAMPBELL COUNTY IN CENTRAL VIRGINIA
PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL VIRGINIA
Mill Creek in Flats (area of proposed uranium milling ponds)
* UNTIL 400 PM EST.
* AT 1155 AM EST SEVERAL STREAMS AND CREEKS WERE STILL OUT OF THEIR
BANKS AND GAGES INDICATED THEY WERE STILL RISING. IN THE CITY OF
DANVILLE...NO FLOODING PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN REPORTED SO THE WARNING
THERE WILL EXPIRE AT NOON...BUT FOR PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY AND CAMPBELL
COUNTY THE WARNING IS EXTENDED THROUGH THE AFTERNOON.
Dry Branch, S Meadows Rd (proposed site of uranium milling ponds)
* AT 1145 AM EST...IN CAMPBELL COUNTY...THE BIG OTTER CREEK WAS
STILL RISING AS WAS THE FALLING RIVER NEAR NARUNA.
Coles Rd, Mill Creek
IN PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY...THE PIGG RIVER NEAR SANDY LEVEL WAS STILL RISING...AND THE SANDY RIVER NEAR DANVILLE WAS RISING AGAIN FOR A SECOND TIME EVEN THOUGH IT WAS JUST BELOW THE 8.0 FOOT FLOOD STAGE.
Coles Rd., Mill Creek
A FLOOD WARNING MEANS THAT FLOODING IS IMMINENT OR HAS BEEN REPORTED.
STREAM RISES WILL BE SLOW AND FLASH FLOODING IS NOT EXPECTED.
HOWEVER...ALL INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS
IMMEDIATELY.
Coles Rd.
PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS...
Bannister River, Under Mountain (area near proposed uranium tailing ponds)
EXCESSIVE RUNOFF FROM HEAVY RAINFALL WILL CAUSE ELEVATED LEVELS ON
SMALL CREEKS AND STREAMS...AND PONDING OF WATER ON COUNTRY ROADS AND
FARMLAND ALONG THE BANKS OF CREEKS AND STREAMS.
Dry Branch, S Meadows Rd (proposed site of uranium milling ponds)
DO NOT DRIVE YOUR VEHICLE INTO AREAS WHERE THE WATER COVERS THE
ROADWAY. THE WATER DEPTH MAY BE TOO GREAT TO ALLOW YOUR CAR TO CROSS
SAFELY. MOVE TO HIGHER GROUND.
RELAY YOUR REPORTS OF FLOODING TO THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN
BLACKSBURG BY CALLING TOLL FREE...1...8 6 6...2 1 5...4 3 2 4.
&&
LAT...LON 3703 7892 3704 7911 3655 7922 3655 7945
3657 7937 3664 7939 3655 7947 3655 7971
3704 7959 3701 7947 3706 7948 3707 7944
3742 7922 3736 7918 3741 7910 3739 7907
3743 7903 3725 7892 3719 7883
Read more:
http://www.weather.gov/ahps/hic/index.php/showproduct/RNK/FLW/1264438807/
Water inflow prompts shuts down Myra Falls zinc mine
Comment: Flooding at mines will ruin our rivers and wells!
* Shares down C$0.015 at C$0.35
TORONTO, Nov 17 (Reuters) - Shares of Breakwater Resources (BWR.TO) slid 4 percent on Tuesday after the junior miner said it had evacuated its troubled Myra Falls zinc mine in British Columbia due flooding caused by heavy rain and melting snow.
This will mean additional delays in restoring production at the mine, which went on hold two weeks ago following a fire in a production hoist.
The company said on Monday it had replaced a damaged switch gear on the hoist and returned it to service, but just hours later it said excessive rain and snow melt had created a "considerable amount of water runoff" at the mine, prompting it to evacuate the underground operations.
"Typically you get water in mines and you pump it out on a regular basis, so the issue is if you're at all concerned about the rate of inflow," said Ann Wilkinson, the company's vice-president of investor relations.
"Being cautious people, we decided we would affect an orderly evacuation and wait until things dried up a little bit."
She said the company will provide updates as appropriate.
The mine is located in the Coast Mountain range on Vancouver Island, and in an area that received 8 to 10 inches of snow on the weekend, with more expected, Wilkinson said.
For Breakwater, the evacuation is just the latest in what has been an an eventful couple of weeks.
In addition to the fire, the company announced the surprise resignation of Chief Executive George Pirie two weeks ago. He was replaced by David Petroff. As well, it narrowly averted a strike at Myra Falls last week when it reached a last-minute deal with unionized workers.
The company's shares were down 1-1/2 Canadian cents at 35 Canadian cents on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Read more:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN17745320091117
* Shares down C$0.015 at C$0.35
TORONTO, Nov 17 (Reuters) - Shares of Breakwater Resources (BWR.TO) slid 4 percent on Tuesday after the junior miner said it had evacuated its troubled Myra Falls zinc mine in British Columbia due flooding caused by heavy rain and melting snow.
This will mean additional delays in restoring production at the mine, which went on hold two weeks ago following a fire in a production hoist.
The company said on Monday it had replaced a damaged switch gear on the hoist and returned it to service, but just hours later it said excessive rain and snow melt had created a "considerable amount of water runoff" at the mine, prompting it to evacuate the underground operations.
"Typically you get water in mines and you pump it out on a regular basis, so the issue is if you're at all concerned about the rate of inflow," said Ann Wilkinson, the company's vice-president of investor relations.
"Being cautious people, we decided we would affect an orderly evacuation and wait until things dried up a little bit."
She said the company will provide updates as appropriate.
The mine is located in the Coast Mountain range on Vancouver Island, and in an area that received 8 to 10 inches of snow on the weekend, with more expected, Wilkinson said.
For Breakwater, the evacuation is just the latest in what has been an an eventful couple of weeks.
In addition to the fire, the company announced the surprise resignation of Chief Executive George Pirie two weeks ago. He was replaced by David Petroff. As well, it narrowly averted a strike at Myra Falls last week when it reached a last-minute deal with unionized workers.
The company's shares were down 1-1/2 Canadian cents at 35 Canadian cents on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Read more:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN17745320091117
Friday, January 29, 2010
Weigh the benefits, costs of mining
By Published by The Editorial Board
Published: January 28, 2010
To the editor:
I claim no expertise with regard to the safety of uranium mining, and I realize that our region is in dire need of new industry that would bring it jobs and tax revenue.
It would seem that, in the short term, uranium mining would bring the much-needed benefits to our area. On the other hand, the Internet is replete with disaster stories of the long-term effects of uranium mining, which raises the question: Is this region willing to bring uranium mining to the region for the short-term benefits at the potential cost of long-term damage to the environment and its citizens?
A recent letter writer had my attention until he began calling those expressing concern, crackpots and naysayers. I suggest that those in favor of uranium mining be willing to take a look at their responsibility for the long-term damage that may result from the mining of uranium.
DON NICOL
Penhook
http://www2.godanriver.com/gdr/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/danville_letters/article/weigh_the_benefits_costs_of_mining/17452/
Published: January 28, 2010
To the editor:
I claim no expertise with regard to the safety of uranium mining, and I realize that our region is in dire need of new industry that would bring it jobs and tax revenue.
It would seem that, in the short term, uranium mining would bring the much-needed benefits to our area. On the other hand, the Internet is replete with disaster stories of the long-term effects of uranium mining, which raises the question: Is this region willing to bring uranium mining to the region for the short-term benefits at the potential cost of long-term damage to the environment and its citizens?
A recent letter writer had my attention until he began calling those expressing concern, crackpots and naysayers. I suggest that those in favor of uranium mining be willing to take a look at their responsibility for the long-term damage that may result from the mining of uranium.
DON NICOL
Penhook
http://www2.godanriver.com/gdr/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/danville_letters/article/weigh_the_benefits_costs_of_mining/17452/
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Vehicle partially collapses into sinkhole in Gretna (Area Proposed Uranium Mining)
By John Crane
Published: January 25, 2010
A road was closed in Pittsylvania County after a vehicle partially collapsed into a sinkhole Monday morning.
Heavy rains contributed to the accident that took place early Monday morning on Sycamore Creek Road in Gretna involving a woman whose minivan got stuck in a sinkhole in the road.
The Gretna Fire Department and workers from the Virginia Department of Transportation were on the scene.
Paula Jones, VDOT spokeswoman, said slope wash was reported at the area last week and a VDOT maintenance manager had ordered piping to stabilize the location. It had not arrived by the time the wreck occurred.
Read more:
http://www2.godanriver.com/gdr/news/local/danville_news/article/heavy_rains_contribute_to_accident_in_gretna/17375/
Study to examine uranium mining
January 27, 2010 6:00 AM
uranium
A study requested by the General Assembly may offer a clue to the future of uranium mining in Southern Virginia, a divisive issue in the region.
The National Research Council (NRC), an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, has tentatively agreed to conduct a study of the safety and feasibility of uranium mining in the commonwealth.
The study was prompted by a proposal by Virginia Uranium Inc. to mine and mill a 119 million pound deposit of uranium ore near Chatham in Pittsylvania County. The uranium is estimated to be worth $8 billion to $10 billion. For mining to begin, the legislature would have to overturn a ban imposed in the early 1980s.
Opponents have raised concerns about pollution to streams and farms. Southern Hampton Roads, for example, draws much of its water from Lake Gaston, which is downstream from the proposed site. Opponents also worry that uranium mining would damage efforts to attract young professionals to the region.
The NRC study will look at uranium mining operations in places around the world that resemble Virginia in population and weather conditions. (Uranium mining sites in the U.S. are in dry areas, which don’t offer a good comparison.)
The study, which will take 18 months, will not be the final word on the issue. It will only provide information for the legislature to consider in lifting or maintaining the ban.
Read more:
http://www.virginiabusiness.com/index.php/news/article/study-to-examine-uranium-mining/
uranium
A study requested by the General Assembly may offer a clue to the future of uranium mining in Southern Virginia, a divisive issue in the region.
The National Research Council (NRC), an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, has tentatively agreed to conduct a study of the safety and feasibility of uranium mining in the commonwealth.
The study was prompted by a proposal by Virginia Uranium Inc. to mine and mill a 119 million pound deposit of uranium ore near Chatham in Pittsylvania County. The uranium is estimated to be worth $8 billion to $10 billion. For mining to begin, the legislature would have to overturn a ban imposed in the early 1980s.
Opponents have raised concerns about pollution to streams and farms. Southern Hampton Roads, for example, draws much of its water from Lake Gaston, which is downstream from the proposed site. Opponents also worry that uranium mining would damage efforts to attract young professionals to the region.
The NRC study will look at uranium mining operations in places around the world that resemble Virginia in population and weather conditions. (Uranium mining sites in the U.S. are in dry areas, which don’t offer a good comparison.)
The study, which will take 18 months, will not be the final word on the issue. It will only provide information for the legislature to consider in lifting or maintaining the ban.
Read more:
http://www.virginiabusiness.com/index.php/news/article/study-to-examine-uranium-mining/
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
EPA Announces “Eyes on Drilling” Tipline
PHILADELPHIA (January 26, 2010) – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today announced the creation of the “Eyes on Drilling” tipline for citizens to report non-emergency suspicious activity related to oil and natural gas development.
The agency is asking citizens to call 1-877-919-4EPA (toll free) if they observe what appears to be illegal disposal of wastes or other suspicious activity.
Anyone may also send reports by email to eyesondrilling@epa.gov.
Citizens may provide tips anonymously if they don’t want to identify themselves.
In the event of an emergency, such as a spill or release of hazardous material, including oil, to the environment, citizens are advised to call the National Response Center at 1-800-424-8802.
Public concern about the environmental impacts of oil and natural gas drilling has increased in recent months, particularly regarding development of the Marcellus Shale formation where a significant amount of activity is occurring. While EPA doesn’t grant permits for oil and gas drilling operations, there are EPA regulations which may apply to the storage of petroleum products and drilling fluids. The agency is also very concerned about the proper disposal of waste products, and protecting air and water resources.
EPA wants to get a better understanding of what people are experiencing and observing as a result of these drilling activities. The information collected may also be useful in investigating industry practices.
The agency works closely with state and local officials, as well as industry and public interest groups, to ensure that oil and natural gas drilling occurs in a manner which is protective of human health and the environment and complies with applicable laws. The agency is also counting on concerned citizens to report unusual or suspicious activity related to drilling operations.
EPA is asking citizens to report the location, time and date of such activity, as well as the materials, equipment and vehicles involved and any observable environmental impacts.
The Marcellus Shale geologic formation contains one of the largest mostly untapped reserves of natural gas in the United States. It underlies significant portions of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and New York, and smaller portions of Tennessee, Virginia, Maryland, and Kentucky.
Interest in developing Marcellus Shale has increased because recent improvements in natural gas extraction technology and higher energy prices now make recovering the gas more profitable.
Operators produce this gas through a process called hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Fracking requires drilling a well thousands of feet below the land’s surface and pumping down the well under pressure millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals to fracture the shale.
The process allows the gas trapped in the formation to flow to the well bore. Approximately 20 to 30 percent of the fluid flows back to the surface. This “flowback” fluid consists of fracking fluid and brines which contain dissolved minerals from the formation.
Operators are urged to recycle their flowback water for reuse in the fracking process, but some of the flowback is taken offsite for disposal. Chemicals used in the process are often stored on-site. Spills can occur when utilizing these chemicals or when transporting or storing wastewater, which can result in the contamination of surface water or ground water, which is used for many purposes including drinking water.
Instructions for the tipline can be found at:
http://www.epa.gov/region03/marcellus_shale/tipline.html
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Pulaski County Public Service Authority asks customers to conserve tap water
January 26, 2010
Here's a copy of the press release:
Notice to Customers of The Pulaski County Public Service Authority and the Town of Dublin
CONSERVE TAP WATER
The Virginia Department of Health in conjunction with the Pulaski County Health Department, the Pulaski County Public Service Authority Water System, and the Town of Dublin are REQUESTING WATER CUSTOMERS TO CONSERVE WATER AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. This precaution is necessary because the water treatment facilities are unable to pump water from the lake and have not been able to treat the water adequately when it reaches the treatment plant. This problem is caused by the condition of the water as a result of the recent flooding. The remaining water in the distribution system is being conserved as much as possible. It is anticipated we will run out of water at the end of the day unless the condition of the water improves to a point where it can be pumped and treated. The cooperation of the customers during the recent boil water notice is appreciated and it is being requested again to help everyone through this event.
Plans are being made to assist residents in the event the water distribution system supply is drained and no water will be available through the normal methods. These efforts will be finalized today and information provided to locations where alternate supplies of water may be found.
This notice only affects the customers of the Pulaski County Public Service Authority and does not affect the Town of Pulaski except for users located in the Newbern Heights Subdivision adjacent to the Town of Pulaski. It does affect the Town of Dublin and its customers, the communities of Draper, Fairlawn, New River, Belspring and Parrott.
For more information call: Robert Hiss at 540-980-7708
Waterworks contact: Pulaski County Public Service Authority
143 Third Street N. W. Suite 1
Pulaski, Virginia 24301
Read more:
http://www.wdbj7.com/Global/story.asp?s=11880934&clienttype=printable
Monday, January 25, 2010
Provide a better environment for bees
January 24, 2010
Mark Bernskoetter, Master Gardener
Q: I have heard a lot of concern about decreasing bee populations and the impact that will have on our food supplies. Is there anything I and my neighborhood can do help support the bee population?
D.B. in West Plains
A: What you are talking about is known as colony collapse. Over the last few years, beekeepers have noted more and more hives dying out.
While it is natural that some hives will die out each year, what has been happening for the last few years is that about one-third of the remaining hives are dying off each year.
There has been a lot of speculation about the causes of this collapse. In some cases, the hives are simply disappearing -- the bees go out to seek flowers and never return. After losing enough workers, the hive can no longer sustain itself and the remaining bees die.
Some research shows multiple viruses contained in the bodies of dead bees that have been found, but it is uncertain whether these pathogens caused the decline and death, which ones are commonly present and do not present much danger to the bees, or perhaps something else has compromised the immune system of the bees and made it possible for these viruses to affect these insects.
Some farmers have hired beekeepers to bring hives out to their fields during flowering times so the bees can roam about, pollinating crops.
So, what can you do? Well, since we don't know for sure what the main culprit is, we cannot cure the problem. However, we can make a better environment for bees.
First and foremost, reduce or eliminate your use of pesticides in the lawn and garden. Americans spend in excess of $11 billion per year on pesticides, and most of these are deadly to bees as well as other insects.
The American homeowner uses more pesticides per acre than farmers.
Applying insecticides can certainly reduce a nuisance population; however, it will also kill off beneficial insects.
When we use a pesticide, we can actually aggravate our problems by killing helpful insects that might be able to contain the pests.
This will probably lead you to apply another treatment which will then kill off more beneficial insects along with the nuisance ones.
Secondly, grow plants that are attractive and helpful to bees. Offer them lots of flowers -- a veritable buffet.
Use more natives than exotic plants -- native plants usually have more nectar and pollen than hybrids and fancier cultivars. Bees will still be attracted to these engineered flowers, but they will not get their fill of nectar from them.
Plant a mix of annuals and perennials to get a good variety of blooms and nectars.
Notice from year to year what kinds of blooms they seem to really like and plant lots of those flowers next year.
Plant things they like in masses. Studies show that individual bees and the whole hive will spend more time on one large grouping of a certain flower than the equal number of flowers spread around a yard.
Avoid flowers with double blooms and lots of ruffles, as they are usually too difficult for the bee to get to the nectar.
Use plants that will provide food for the bees during three seasons.
Spring-blooming shrubs and fruit trees and shrubs are a great source of nectar early in the growing season. Summer time is easy -- there are thousands of varieties of blooms that are attractive and helpful to bees.
For the fall, be sure you have lots of asters, sedum and goldenrod.
Provide a water source such as a birdbath or drip irrigation. Bees do require water for survival and have to spend time looking for it in our typical summer drought.
Q: I've heard some discussion about "plant hardiness zones," but I don't really know what that is or how it affects my plants. How can I learn more?
K.L. Branson
A: Environmental factors like heat, compacted soils, cold temperatures and various pest problems, make growing landscape plants in the Ozarks a real challenge.
However, there is hope. Gardeners can minimize these environmental factors by knowing the specific requirements of plants in our area. Also, doing your homework before purchasing plants will increase your plant successes.
For example, most gardeners should become familiar with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's "Cold Hardiness Zone Map."
First published in 1960, this map is based on average annual minimum temperatures recorded throughout North America.
By using the map to find the zone where you live, you can determine which plants will "winter over" in your garden because they can withstand these temperatures.
The hardiness zone ranges from Zone 1, which is Fairbanks, Alaska to Zone 11, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Most of the plant zone for southwest Missouri is 6-A (average minimal temperature of -5 to -10 degrees). The Branson area is rated as 6-B (average minimal temperature of 0 to -5 degrees).
When plants are purchased from your local nursery, plants should not be available that are not hardy to your area unless special precautions are indicated.
In most cases attached plant labels will indicate the zone most suitable for your plants.
For specific information on plant hardiness zones and a listing of plants adaptable to the various zones visit this Web site: http://www.usna.usda.gov/Hardzone/ushmap.html.
Another useful map, besides the USDA "Plant Hardiness Zone Map," is the "American Horticultural Society Plant Heat-Zone Map." This map helps gardeners determine a plant's likelihood for survival from extremes in temperatures.
This 12-zone map indicates the average number of days each year that a region experiences "heat days."
"Heat days" are those days with temperatures over 86 degrees, the point at which plants experience damage to cellular proteins.
Southwest Missouri's heat zone is seven because this area has an average of 61 to 90 days with temperatures above 86 degrees.
When used in conjunction with the Plant Hardiness Zone Map, consumers can select plants that may do well in their gardens throughout the year.
For more information about the heat zone map, visit: http://www.ahs.org/publications/heat_zone_map.htm.
Read more:
http://www.news-leader.com/article/20100124/LIFE0504/1240303/Provide+a+better+environment+for+bees
Sunday, January 24, 2010
France discovers legacy of its uranium mining
published by WISE News Communique on January 31, 1992
Recently, uranium wastes in France have been receiving more and more attention in the media.
Among some of the headlines: "Many uranium mill tailings deposits found to be illegal"; "200,000 nuclear waste casks found in mined-out uranium mines"; "severe contamination of the environment with transport of uranium ores and uranium mill tailings".
WISE Amsterdam - With the ending of uranium mining in eastern Germany, France has become the largest producer of uranium in Europe (without taking the former USSR into account). France produces about one half of its reactor-related uranium needs from domestic mines, in addition to the uranium needed for nuclear weapons. The highest production was attained in 1988 with 3,394 tonnes of uranium. Since then, there has been a slight decrease.
Uneconomic mines are being closed now due to the low uranium world market prices, and production is concentrated at higher grade deposits. Until now, the largest uranium mining province in France has been located in the northwest corner of the Massif Central mountains north of Limoges. Mining in this region is to be totally closed down by 1996.
So far, uranium mining in France has been carried out with little interference. Protests were often raised when the opening up of new mines were proposed, but the mines received no more attention once mining operations began. As no new mines were opened over the past few years, protests stopped completely. Thus the environmental problems related to mining activities, the milling of the ore and especially the uranium mill tailings deposits went unnoticed for a long time. But a half year ago, the situation changed dramatically.
The change was initiated by the independent radiation monitoring group Commission de Recherche d'Information Independente sur la Radioactivite (CRII-Rad). CRII-Rad discovered in a statement by Cogema (a state-owned company and the main uranium producer in France) that several uranium mill tailings deposits in the Limoges area contain more than 1000 Curie (37 TeraBequerels, i.e. 37 trillion Bq) of radium-226 and thus should have been licensed as basic nuclear installations.
That implies elaboration of an environmental assessment report and public participation during the licensing procedure. Moreover, a July 1991 report by a government commission (Commission Desgraupes) on nuclear wastes in France revealed that several other uranium mill deposits in France go beyond the 1000 Curie limit and are thus being operated illegally.2
In November 1991, Cogema published a report on the nuclear waste deposits at all of its sites.
According to that report, 18,048 casks containing low-level nuclear waste from the uranium enrichment plant at Pierrelatte in the Rhône Valley have been deposited at the Brugeaud site at Bessines near Limoges, and 176,150 allegedly empty radioactively contaminated casks have been deposited in the mined-out open pit of the Margnac uranium mine, also near Limoges.3 Deposits of scrap and wastes were recently discovered there as well. Cogema secretly, under cover of night, had these wastes covered with earth. When called to account by journalists for this, Cogema stated that the lorry driver involved had wanted to work at night for family reasons.4
The Bessines uranium mill, which is operated by the Cogema subsidiary SIMO, has produced a total of 25,046 tonnes of uranium since 1958 (up to 1990). Some part of this uranium (934 tonnes) was produced by piling low grade ores in large heaps, where the uranium was recovered using the "heap-leaching" method.
All uranium production (until 1990) at Bessines resulted in the production of 19.86 million tonnes of radioactive sludges and wastes which were dumped on the mill site and in the surrounding area. 3 The Bessines mill also processed the last of around 5000 tonnes of uranium ore that were left over from the shut down of the Menzenschwand uranium mine in the southern Black Forest in western Germany. (This ore could no longer be processed in the West German Ellweiler uranium mill because it had been closed for environmental reasons.)
The management practices involved in the transport of the uranium mill tailings from the Bessines mill to the deposit over a distance of 3 km has also become a matter of discussion. The sludges are not transported on tank trucks, but on ordinary trucks. This has resulted in significant contamination of the roads used, as well as of the adjacent grounds, as recently proved by CRII-Rad measurements.
One of the victims of these practices is Madame Gorbi, whose house is located on the transport route and is continuously spattered with the radiating sludges. Her struggle has been well publicized. Now the environmental organization FLEPNA has taken up the issue and is suing Cogema.
Recently, the disposal of the radioactive uranium mill tailings itself has become a matter of concern for French environmental organizations.
A visit to Limoges on 18 January 1992 made it painfully clear that the sludges are simply dumped in mined-out open pit mines without any special protective measures being taken. Thus they present a significant long-term hazard to ground water.
Presently the sludges from the Bessines mill are transported to the open pit at Bellezane. Other open pit mines have already been filled with the sludges. The last of these was the pit mine at Montmassacrot. Some part of the sludges is dumped in tailings ponds at the sites of former open pit uranium mines, e.g. at the Brugeaud site at Bessines. There the sludge is covered with water to lower the radon emissions, but this technique causes an increased risk of groundwater contamination due to water seepage.
Read more:
http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/index.html?http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/366/3595.html
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Chatham dairy receives $1 million grant to build state's first methane digester
By TIM DAVIS/Star-Tribune Editor
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:51 AM EST
MARTINSVILLE - Van Der Hyde Dairy in Chatham was awarded a $1 million grant Thursday to build Virginia's first anaerobic digester.
The family-owned dairy, which has been working on the $2.5 million project more than five years, will turn cow manure into "green power," producing enough electricity to light 500 homes - about the size of Chatham.
The digester - basically a concrete pit 160 feet long, 74 feet wide and 16 feet deep - uses heat to break down animal waste.
The process produces methane gas, which is captured and burned in a generator to make electricity.
The Van Der Hydes also received $448,000 from Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission and $150,000 from U.S. Department of Agriculture's EQIP program.
The family set up a new corporation, Dairy Energy Inc., and plans to start construction on the digester this week.
The digester will be built by a Wisconsin company, GHD Inc., and should be operational in September, said dairy president Roy Van Der Hyde.
"We're very excited that it's finally come to this point where we can stop looking at development and start construction," he said.
The Van Der Hydes' grant was among $10 million in federal awards announced Thursday by Gov. Timothy Kaine at the Virginia Museum of Natural History in Martinsville.
Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, grants went to 15 biomass and waste-to-energy projects.
The grants are part of the state's energy program and are administered by the Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy.
"The best way to strengthen our economy is to invest in projects that will create jobs while setting the commonwealth up for future success," Kaine said.
"The development of alternative energy sources is particularly important as a way to grow our economy and reduce energy costs at a time Virginians need it most.
"These grants will support projects that offer a much needed boost to communities throughout Southside and Southwest Virginia today while paving the way to a greener, cleaner tomorrow," the governor added.
Fifth District Congressman Tom Perriello called the Van Der Hydes trailblazers and said the energy grants represent an important turning point for Virginia.
"This is an industrial revolution type moment," said Perriello. "We are on the cusp of transformation. I believe we can be known as the clean energy capital of Virginia."
Van Der Hyde said his family is glad to be part of the push for clean energy.
"Our family deeply appreciates this opportunity to promote Virginia's renewable energy," he said.
Today, the Van Der Hydes have the third largest dairy in the state and own 1,200 cows along with a number of calves.
Some 950 cows are milked three times a day, 365 days a year, and produce 8,400 gallons of milk every day.
All those cows generate a lot of waste - about 7.5 million gallons of manure a year.
Now, waste goes into a million-gallon storage pit on the farm before being spread on fields as fertilizer.
After the digester is built, manure will be channeled into the concrete chamber and heated to 101 degrees.
A combination of heat and naturally occurring bacteria converts the organic manure into a harmless inorganic material similar to compost that can be used as animal bedding.
The 21-day process also produces methane, a colorless, odorless gas that will be burned to generate 400 kilowatts of electricity an hour, 24 hours a day.
The digester, which is designed to handle waste from 1,600 cows, has foot-thick concrete walls and built-in " fail-safes" to release or "flare off" gas if pressure gets too high.
The Van Der Hydes will tie into Dominion Virginia Power's transmission grid and sell their electricity to highest bidder.
The dairy already has a contract for seven and a half cents a kilowatt hour, which could bring in about $25,000 a year in extra revenue.
The technology will help the Van Der Hydes reduce their "carbon footprint" since methane, a potent greenhouse gas blamed for global warming, will be trapped and burned instead of being released into the air.
In addition to being renewable, methane burns clean. Combustion produces carbon dioxide and water.
There are other benefits as well. Manure digesters reduce odor and flies and eliminate disease-carrying pathogens.
The Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors voted 6-1 last September to amend the county's zoning ordinance to allow anaerobic digesters in the Agricultural District (A-1) with a special-use permit.
The Van Der Hydes cleared their final regulatory hurdle last October when the Board of Zoning Appeals voted unanimously to approve a special-use permit for the digester.
tim.davis@chathamstartribune.com
434-432-2791
Read more:
http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2010/01/21/chatham/news/news57.txt
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Heightened Concern Over BPA
January 21, 2010
Editorial
The Food and Drug Administration has raised its level of concern over the safety of bisphenol-A, or BPA, an industrial chemical found in baby bottles and the linings of canned goods and other consumer products.
But it sheds little light, for now, on how dangerous the chemical might be in the small amounts that leach out and are imbibed by infants and older people — or how rigorously it should be regulated.
In August 2008, F.D.A. released a draft report asserting that the small amounts of BPA that leach into milk or food are not dangerous. One month later, the National Toxicology Program, an interagency assessment group, came to a less reassuring conclusion. It expressed “some concern” — midway between “negligible concern” and “serious concern” — about the potential effects on the brain, behavior and prostate in fetuses, infants and children. Now the F.D.A. has also expressed “some concern” about the same risks.
Still, the message remained murky. Health officials said they have no proof that the chemical has harmed either children or adults. They have not taken any regulatory action to curb its use. Nor have they urged families to change their use of infant formula or foods because the benefit of good nutrition outweighs the potential risk from BPA exposure.
Instead, the two agencies will conduct crucial research on the safety of BPA over the next 18 to 24 months to reduce “substantial uncertainties” in assessing the risks of low-dose exposures. And the F.D.A. will seek more robust and flexible regulatory authority to clamp down on the chemical if the evidence warrants.
Meanwhile, the agency is suggesting ways that people can limit exposure to BPA (such as not putting very hot liquids into bottles or cups containing BPA). The six largest manufacturers, in response to consumer preferences, are already producing baby bottles without BPA.
While waiting for the regulators to amass more conclusive evidence, wise consumers will try to avoid BPA.
Read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/opinion/21thur2.html?th&emc=th
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Marine Life Flourishing Beneath Off-Shore Wind Turbines
Written by Susan Kraemer
Published on January 19th, 2010
Not only do off-shore wind turbines not harm marine life, but they actively encourage more of it, a very encouraging study has just concluded, after closely following the effects of the off-shore wind farms being built off the European coast.
A Swedish Scientist at the Stockholm University’s Zoology Department studying the effects of off-shore wind turbines discovered that marine life has become more abundant and diverse near the foundations. Dan Wilhelmsson found that offshore wind turbines constitute habitats for fish, crabs, mussels, lobsters and plants.
The seabed in the vicinity of the wind turbines had higher densities of fish compared to further away from the turbines and in control areas. This was despite that the natural bottoms were rich in boulders and algae. Blue mussels dominated on the wind turbines that appeared to offer good growth conditions.
“Hard surfaces are often hard currency in the ocean, and these foundations can function as artificial reefs. Rock boulders are often placed around the structures to prevent erosion (scouring) around these, and this strengthens the reef function,” says Dan Wilhelmsson.
Not only were the foundations giving a boost to marine life, but interestingly, we might be able to build-in features to them in such a way as to enhance conditions to favor those species that need more protection.
“With wind and wave energy farms, it should be possible to create large areas with biologically productive reef structures, which would moreover be protected from bottom trawling. By carefully designing the foundations it would be possible to favor and protect important species, or, conversely, to reduce the reef effects in order minimize the impact on an area,” says Dan Wilhelmsson.
Read more:
http://cleantechnica.com/2010/01/19/the-foundations-of-off-shore-wind-turbines-are-increasing-marine-life/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+cleantechnica%2Fcom+%28CleanTechnica%29
New Coalition Promotes VA Offshore Wind Power
Updated: 6:21 PM
Jan 15, 2010
VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP)
The mayors of two coastal Virginia cities, a congressman and industry leaders have created a coalition to promote offshore wind energy.
Organizers of the Virginia Offshore Wind Coalition announced Friday in Virginia Beach their goal is to create the "Silicon Valley of wind energy on the East Coast."
The coalition includes Virginia Beach Mayor William Sessoms Jr., Norfolk Mayor Paul Fraim, U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye and developers, manufacturers and utilities.
Josh Prueher of Earl Energy and the coalition said development of a wind power hub in Virginia has the potential to become an $80 billion industry creating more than 10,000 jobs.
Read more:
http://www.whsv.com/home/headlines/81785332.html
Jan 15, 2010
VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP)
The mayors of two coastal Virginia cities, a congressman and industry leaders have created a coalition to promote offshore wind energy.
Organizers of the Virginia Offshore Wind Coalition announced Friday in Virginia Beach their goal is to create the "Silicon Valley of wind energy on the East Coast."
The coalition includes Virginia Beach Mayor William Sessoms Jr., Norfolk Mayor Paul Fraim, U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye and developers, manufacturers and utilities.
Josh Prueher of Earl Energy and the coalition said development of a wind power hub in Virginia has the potential to become an $80 billion industry creating more than 10,000 jobs.
Read more:
http://www.whsv.com/home/headlines/81785332.html
Monday, January 18, 2010
Solar energy goes flat on skylights
Tomitheos reporting from Toronto
In the summertime, skylights make it more difficult for air conditioning to cool the space and heat escapes through them in the cold winter months resulting in excessive energy loss through-out the entire Canadian year. A two-by-four-foot clear glass skylight for example, requires 240 extra kilowatt hours of electricity every year, enough to power the average television.
There are exceptions to the rule: metallic roofs and dome-like skylights reflect solar light from the daylight sun without the excessive heat gain of traditional skylights.
From a bird's eye view of the Toronto area one would notice many flat rooftops with skylights on apartments buildings, hospitals, hotels, manufacturing plants, warehouses, office hi-rises and schools. With every flat rooftop as a sunlight sponge and every coinciding skylight an energy hazard, Toronto has great potential to convert solar rays into emission-free electricity and solar entrepreneurs are noticing.
If rooftops are accessed and converted accordingly, the change-over will reduce carbon emissions every year by an amount equal to that produced by at least 1 million cars. As businesses tend to use up a lot of power, it would benefit the business if each flat rooftop can easily be converted with solar power technology to save energy.
The companies leasing the building space can design, build and own the rooftop solar system at no expense or risk to the building owner (as a precaution, it would be wise for the property owner to take in account the cost of insurance for possible damage to a roof and to include the cost of insurance into the solar energy conversion plan). The companies can then apply to connect the system to the grid as part of the Ontario Power Authority's feed-in-tariff program, where the payment for large commercial rooftops averages around 62 cents per kilowatt-hour.
Similar to how Ontario farmers north of the city are earning income by allowing wind turbines on their property, the unused rooftop space can also compensate the owner in the same way. Payment to the building property owner can be reimbursed as a percentage of annual electricity revenues from the system, or a fixed price per square-foot of rooftop being used to host the rooftop solar system.
Greta Energy is one of dozens of emerging ventures that are approaching commercial property owners with a 20 year rooftop access offer and a square-footage plan that is difficult to refuse. The square-footage approach (which on average works out to about 30¢ per ft²) translates to a 250 kilowatt system whereas 10,000 ft² (or 929 m²) of space would result in an annual payment of $3000 to the building owner.
Read more:
http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/solar-energy-goes-flat-skylights
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Downstream study of uranium's risks
Comment: Uranium Mining will happen all over Virginia, not just Southside!
As a feasibility study on uranium mining in Virginia progresses over the next two years, pressure will build in Richmond to delve into a deposit in Southside that could pour billions of dollars into the state economy.
Lake Gaston, downstream from the proposed mining site, is the primary source of drinking water for Virginia Beach, replenishes Norfolk-owned reservoirs and may one day be shared with Chesapeake.
For that reason, local leaders must take the lead in this debate and must be armed with science, not speculation. They need to take steps to ensure they are well-educated on uranium mining in order to defend the interests and safety of their constituents.
Thomas Leahy, Virginia Beach's director of utilities, has employed an engineering firm to construct preliminary models predicting what could happen if a major storm flooded the site and washed pulverized mining waste, including unextracted uranium, into nearby streams. At $437,000, the analysis is not cheap, but it's hard to overestimate the worth of being prepared given the enormous stakes confronting this region.
The city analysis will supplement, rather than replicate, the state study to be performed by the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences. The NAS is but its study will be a broad-brush look at the environmental and health effects of uranium mining in a climate similar to Virginia's.
Consequently, that study will not yield any models of what would happen in a catastrophic storm. Nor will the NAS recommend regulations Virginia would need to guarantee the safety of public water supplies.
Proponents of the mine argue that more detailed studies will be performed later if the state lifts its moratorium on uranium mining and a permit is sought to begin excavation in Pittsylvania.
But that's not a good reason for Beach officials to sit back and hope for the best.
Federal regulations are geared toward mining in arid climates, and even so, they have sometimes failed to address contamination of groundwater systems surrounding uranium deposits in western states.
If mining is to be permitted in Virginia, additional state regulations likely will be needed to address concerns about heavy rainfalls during hurricanes and nor'easters. History suggests Virginia will impose only minimal rules in that regard unless pushed. Indeed, as economic assessments of the Pittsylvania deposit's riches are completed, many lawmakers will be eager to abbreviate regulatory processes.
The $437,000 being spent by Beach officials covers a preliminary assessment that may alleviate city leaders' concerns, or it may raise issues that require more sophisticated modeling... and more money. Either way, the city needs to understand what it's confronting. Doing nothing could be far more costly.
Source URL (retrieved on 01/16/2010 - 21:40): http://hamptonroads.com/2010/01/downstream-study-uraniums-risks
Published on HamptonRoads.com
PilotOnline.com (http://hamptonroads.com/)
Read more:
http://hamptonroads.com/2010/01/downstream-study-uraniums-risks
As a feasibility study on uranium mining in Virginia progresses over the next two years, pressure will build in Richmond to delve into a deposit in Southside that could pour billions of dollars into the state economy.
Lake Gaston, downstream from the proposed mining site, is the primary source of drinking water for Virginia Beach, replenishes Norfolk-owned reservoirs and may one day be shared with Chesapeake.
For that reason, local leaders must take the lead in this debate and must be armed with science, not speculation. They need to take steps to ensure they are well-educated on uranium mining in order to defend the interests and safety of their constituents.
Thomas Leahy, Virginia Beach's director of utilities, has employed an engineering firm to construct preliminary models predicting what could happen if a major storm flooded the site and washed pulverized mining waste, including unextracted uranium, into nearby streams. At $437,000, the analysis is not cheap, but it's hard to overestimate the worth of being prepared given the enormous stakes confronting this region.
The city analysis will supplement, rather than replicate, the state study to be performed by the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences. The NAS is but its study will be a broad-brush look at the environmental and health effects of uranium mining in a climate similar to Virginia's.
Consequently, that study will not yield any models of what would happen in a catastrophic storm. Nor will the NAS recommend regulations Virginia would need to guarantee the safety of public water supplies.
Proponents of the mine argue that more detailed studies will be performed later if the state lifts its moratorium on uranium mining and a permit is sought to begin excavation in Pittsylvania.
But that's not a good reason for Beach officials to sit back and hope for the best.
Federal regulations are geared toward mining in arid climates, and even so, they have sometimes failed to address contamination of groundwater systems surrounding uranium deposits in western states.
If mining is to be permitted in Virginia, additional state regulations likely will be needed to address concerns about heavy rainfalls during hurricanes and nor'easters. History suggests Virginia will impose only minimal rules in that regard unless pushed. Indeed, as economic assessments of the Pittsylvania deposit's riches are completed, many lawmakers will be eager to abbreviate regulatory processes.
The $437,000 being spent by Beach officials covers a preliminary assessment that may alleviate city leaders' concerns, or it may raise issues that require more sophisticated modeling... and more money. Either way, the city needs to understand what it's confronting. Doing nothing could be far more costly.
Source URL (retrieved on 01/16/2010 - 21:40): http://hamptonroads.com/2010/01/downstream-study-uraniums-risks
Published on HamptonRoads.com
PilotOnline.com (http://hamptonroads.com/)
Read more:
http://hamptonroads.com/2010/01/downstream-study-uraniums-risks
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Health Q&A: First lead, now cadmium: How’s a parent to know what’s safe?
By Tammie Smith
Published: January 16, 2010
Jewelry scare: How do you know what's safe? Q:My daughters have lots of trinkets and jewelry from Stores and other places. With the scare about cadmium, should I throw it all away?
Answer: Certain Stores have said they are removing suspect items from their store shelves. An Associated Press report found toy jewelry manufactured in China with high levels of the metal cadmium. The report suggests that manufacturers, under pressure to remove lead from children's items, replaced the metal with cadmium, another potentially toxic metal.
Zakia Shabazz was not surprised to learn that foreign manufacturers have substituted another toxic metal for the lead banned from children's toys.
"We can't rely on someone else's government" to make sure items are safe, said Shabazz, director of Richmond-based United Parents Against Lead, an organization that advocates protecting children against environmental health hazards.
Shabazz urged parents to be aware of what they are buying and giving to their children.
For the report, the AP tested 103 pieces of cheap children's jewelry bought at different stores from around the country. Most of the items -- 89 -- didn't have cadmium. The 14 items that contained cadmium had at least 10 percent cadmium by weight, with one item 91 percent cadmium by weight.
Some fear that cadmium, like lead, can cause neurological damage if ingested by small children.
The research is mixed, however. A 2009 study from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health looked retrospectively at effects of low-levels of cadmium in children who were being tracked for lead exposure.
The researchers didn't find any association between low blood levels of cadmium and neurodevelopmental and blood-pressure effects on children at ages 2, 5 and 7. The researchers say more study was needed.
Cadmium potentially can be toxic, but "just like everything else, it depends on the dose," said Dr. Kirk Cumpston, medical director of the Virginia Poison Center at Virginia Commonwealth University.
"I don't think we really have known cases of this exposure," Cumpston said. "I don't think we as clinicians have really looked into it, to look at what kinds of effects." With lead, on the other hand, exposure risks are well-known and documented.
Contact Tammie Smith at (804) 649-6572 or TLsmith@timesdispatch.com.
More information:
Read more at the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission at:
http://www.cpsc.gov/.
Read about cadmium in a Centers for Disease Control Report on environmental exposure to toxic metals at: http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport
Read more:
http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/lifestyles/health_med_fit/health/article/HP-QUES16_20100115-184202/317876/
Friday, January 15, 2010
Uranium Mining Lawsuit Gets a Boost as Judge Unlocks Feds' Records
For Immediate Release, 15 January 2010
Damien Borg, INFORM, damien@informcolorado.org
DURANGO, Colo.— A ruling handed down in federal court Thursday has significantly bolstered a legal challenge to the revival and expansion of uranium mining on public lands in the American West. U.S. District Judge Wiley Daniel ruled yesterday that conservation groups could now question Department of Energy officials and obtain records connected to a 42-square-mile uranium leasing program that threatens water and wildlife in the Dolores and San Miguel rivers in western Colorado and eastern Utah.
“This is a big victory for the Dolores and San Miguel rivers and a good sign for our litigation,” said Travis Stills of the Durango-based Energy Minerals Law Center who is leading the litigation. “Chief Judge Daniel took a thorough look at the filings and agreed that this lawsuit brings a comprehensive challenge to the DOE’s failure to take a hard look at the effects of the uranium lease program, the issuance of uranium leases, and the approval of exploration and mining activity.”
The Colorado Environmental Coalition, Information Network for Responsible Mining, Center for Native Ecosystems, and Center for Biological Diversity sued the Department of Energy and Bureau of Land Management in July 2008 for approving the program without analyzing the full environmental impacts that could come from individual uranium mining leases. The Energy Department has since issued leases without any additional review. Thursday’s ruling allows the groups to get information about those leases from the Department to use in their challenge of the entire program.
“The federal uranium-mining program has triggered a series of proposals, including the first uranium mill proposal in decades,” said Joe Neuhof of the Colorado Environmental Coalition. “We are pleased that this lawsuit will now move forward and provide an opportunity to require the federal government to disclose the serious impacts uranium mining will, and has, had on the people in western Colorado.”
“This ruling marks a critical step toward ending the Department of Energy’s shell game of avoiding environmental review,” said Taylor McKinnon, public lands campaigns director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Risking species, public lands, and scarce western water with irreversible uranium contamination is profoundly short-sighted – but that’s exactly what the Department of Energy has done.”
Uranium mining and milling resulting from the lease program will deplete Colorado River basin water and threaten to pollute streams and rivers with toxic and radioactive waste products, including uranium, selenium, ammonia, arsenic, molybdenum, aluminum, barium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, vanadium, and zinc. These pollutants may contaminate rivers and aquatic ecosystems for hundreds of years following uranium mining, threatening downstream communities and fish and wildlife. Selenium and arsenic contamination in the Colorado River basin from abandoned uranium mining operations in the region has been implicated in the decline of the four endangered Colorado River fish species and may be impeding their recovery.
“Even small amounts of some of these pollutants, like selenium, can accumulate in the food chain and cause deformities and reproductive problems for endangered fishes, ducks, river otters and eagles,” said Josh Pollock of the Center for Native Ecosystems. “It is irresponsible for the Department of Energy to put fish and wildlife at risk by rushing to approve numerous uranium mines without adequate protections to prevent pollution.”
Since approving renewal and expansion of the uranium leasing program in 2007, and despite having sidestepped Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act requirements, the Department of Energy has executed dozens of new 10-year lease agreements. It also has authorized new and additional mining, without conducting specific analysis of the past, present or future impacts or uranium mining. Uranium tailings on Department of Energy leases and other tracts have already contaminated the Dolores and San Miguel River watersheds, heavily impacting water quality in both rivers. Proposed uranium mines and mills in the area, including the Whirlwind mine and the Paradox uranium mill, may also result in runoff and discharge of contaminants into the Dolores River basin.
The public lands impacted by the uranium leasing program – which are co-managed by the Department and the Bureau of Land Management – are world-renowned for their unique and impressive mesas, canyons, arches, and wild sections of river that draw recreationists from around the world. “The Department of Energy’s actions are not only irresponsible, they risk devastating destruction to the biota for short-term gain,” said Damien Borg of INFORM. “This is reprehensible behavior and must not be tolerated.”
Read more:
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2010/uranium-01-15-1020.html
Damien Borg, INFORM, damien@informcolorado.org
DURANGO, Colo.— A ruling handed down in federal court Thursday has significantly bolstered a legal challenge to the revival and expansion of uranium mining on public lands in the American West. U.S. District Judge Wiley Daniel ruled yesterday that conservation groups could now question Department of Energy officials and obtain records connected to a 42-square-mile uranium leasing program that threatens water and wildlife in the Dolores and San Miguel rivers in western Colorado and eastern Utah.
“This is a big victory for the Dolores and San Miguel rivers and a good sign for our litigation,” said Travis Stills of the Durango-based Energy Minerals Law Center who is leading the litigation. “Chief Judge Daniel took a thorough look at the filings and agreed that this lawsuit brings a comprehensive challenge to the DOE’s failure to take a hard look at the effects of the uranium lease program, the issuance of uranium leases, and the approval of exploration and mining activity.”
The Colorado Environmental Coalition, Information Network for Responsible Mining, Center for Native Ecosystems, and Center for Biological Diversity sued the Department of Energy and Bureau of Land Management in July 2008 for approving the program without analyzing the full environmental impacts that could come from individual uranium mining leases. The Energy Department has since issued leases without any additional review. Thursday’s ruling allows the groups to get information about those leases from the Department to use in their challenge of the entire program.
“The federal uranium-mining program has triggered a series of proposals, including the first uranium mill proposal in decades,” said Joe Neuhof of the Colorado Environmental Coalition. “We are pleased that this lawsuit will now move forward and provide an opportunity to require the federal government to disclose the serious impacts uranium mining will, and has, had on the people in western Colorado.”
“This ruling marks a critical step toward ending the Department of Energy’s shell game of avoiding environmental review,” said Taylor McKinnon, public lands campaigns director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Risking species, public lands, and scarce western water with irreversible uranium contamination is profoundly short-sighted – but that’s exactly what the Department of Energy has done.”
Uranium mining and milling resulting from the lease program will deplete Colorado River basin water and threaten to pollute streams and rivers with toxic and radioactive waste products, including uranium, selenium, ammonia, arsenic, molybdenum, aluminum, barium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, vanadium, and zinc. These pollutants may contaminate rivers and aquatic ecosystems for hundreds of years following uranium mining, threatening downstream communities and fish and wildlife. Selenium and arsenic contamination in the Colorado River basin from abandoned uranium mining operations in the region has been implicated in the decline of the four endangered Colorado River fish species and may be impeding their recovery.
“Even small amounts of some of these pollutants, like selenium, can accumulate in the food chain and cause deformities and reproductive problems for endangered fishes, ducks, river otters and eagles,” said Josh Pollock of the Center for Native Ecosystems. “It is irresponsible for the Department of Energy to put fish and wildlife at risk by rushing to approve numerous uranium mines without adequate protections to prevent pollution.”
Since approving renewal and expansion of the uranium leasing program in 2007, and despite having sidestepped Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act requirements, the Department of Energy has executed dozens of new 10-year lease agreements. It also has authorized new and additional mining, without conducting specific analysis of the past, present or future impacts or uranium mining. Uranium tailings on Department of Energy leases and other tracts have already contaminated the Dolores and San Miguel River watersheds, heavily impacting water quality in both rivers. Proposed uranium mines and mills in the area, including the Whirlwind mine and the Paradox uranium mill, may also result in runoff and discharge of contaminants into the Dolores River basin.
The public lands impacted by the uranium leasing program – which are co-managed by the Department and the Bureau of Land Management – are world-renowned for their unique and impressive mesas, canyons, arches, and wild sections of river that draw recreationists from around the world. “The Department of Energy’s actions are not only irresponsible, they risk devastating destruction to the biota for short-term gain,” said Damien Borg of INFORM. “This is reprehensible behavior and must not be tolerated.”
Read more:
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2010/uranium-01-15-1020.html
Adobe turns to the wind for power
By Brandon Bailey
bbailey@mercurynews.com
Posted: 01/14/2010 10:39:29 AM PST
Updated: 01/15/2010 06:00:59 AM PST
What's that on the sixth-floor deck of Adobe headquarters in downtown San Jose? Those slender silver spires, spinning quietly in the breeze, are actually turbines producing environmentally friendly electric power.
Workers installed the 20 wind turbines over the December holidays at Adobe Systems' high-rise offices at Park Avenue and Almaden Boulevard. Officials at the big software company say it's part of a larger effort to tap renewable sources for the power they need to keep the lights, computers and other equipment running at Adobe's facilities here and around the world.
Renewable energy isn't a new idea for Silicon Valley, where Google, Microsoft and other big tech companies use solar panels to supply some of the power for their local sites. But wind turbines are more typically found in rural or suburban areas. City officials say Adobe is the first to install them on a building in downtown San Jose.
"You just don't see this going on in an urban environment," acknowledged Randy Knox III, Adobe's director of facilities and environmental programs. "But it kind of looks like art."
Each turbine is 30 feet tall and 4 feet wide, with an open framework that rotates slowly on a vertical axis. Unlike traditional windmill designs, which have wide propeller blades, the manufacturer says the vertical turbines are designed to turn slowly and are unlikely to harm passing birds.
The installation is expected to produce about 50,000 kilowatt hours of electricity a year, according to Knox. That's enough to power five or six average homes, though it's less than 2 percent of the total energy consumption at Adobe's three downtown towers, where more than 2,000 programmers, sales reps and other employees work in nearly 1 million square feet of office space.
Adobe has already won "green building" certification for the complex, by taking numerous steps to lower its energy use. Knox said the company is also evaluating the potential for using solar power and fuel cells, which make electricity from renewable sources.
Adobe placed several of the turbines in planter boxes that line the deck's perimeter, where they're not expected to disturb anyone using the patio to eat lunch or play on its basketball and bocce courts. The turbines rotate in near-silence. Knox said their "bird-friendly" design was also an important consideration, since peregrine falcons and other species are known to visit the buildings.
The spires turn slowly enough to remain visible, so birds are unlikely to fly into them, said Amy Berry, a spokeswoman for Mariah Power, the Reno-based startup that sells the turbines.
Adobe won't disclose how much the installation cost, although Knox said the turbine's output should lower Adobe's spending for outside power enough to make up the cost in about eight years.
"We're looking at it as an investment in technology that needs to be developed," he added.
A spokesman for the American Wind Energy Association, a trade group, said he was glad to hear of Adobe's installation. Ron Stimmel said wind power is seeing increased adoption in the United States, but it's still rare in urban areas. At Adobe, one row of turbines stands above Almaden Boulevard, where they're easily spotted from the sidewalk across the street.
"I like that it's in a place where people can see it," Stimmel added. "It brings renewable energy to people's backyards, instead of being out in a big field somewhere."
Read more:
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14191622
Thursday, January 14, 2010
County, city should ban uranium at mega park
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:13 AM EST
The Danville-Pittsylvania Regional Industrial Facilities Authority consists of City Council and Board of Supervisors members.
According to code and ordinance, the authority exists to enhance the economic base for the member localities and to promote the health, safety, welfare, convenience and prosperity of inhabitants of the region and commonwealth.
At present, the authority is developing the Berry Hill Mega Park and has spent approximately $13 million.
Pittsylvania County's administrator has been quoted as saying that installation of roads, utilities, erosion control, grading and making the site into a park will cost $222 million.
Everyone is hopeful that this park will be developed, resulting in long-term employment and economic opportunity.
Danville-Pittsylvania Regional Industrial Facilities Authority member and county supervisor Coy Harville was quoted as saying RIFA has no intention of mining uranium at the Berry Hill mega park site.
Mega park parcels purchased by the authority have historic Marline uranium leases. The authority now owns the mineral rights to the mega park.
If no uranium mining and milling are planned for the mega park, why not pass a resolution declaring that to be the case?
Karen B. Maute
Danville, VA
http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2010/01/14/chatham/opinion/opinion05.txt
The Danville-Pittsylvania Regional Industrial Facilities Authority consists of City Council and Board of Supervisors members.
According to code and ordinance, the authority exists to enhance the economic base for the member localities and to promote the health, safety, welfare, convenience and prosperity of inhabitants of the region and commonwealth.
At present, the authority is developing the Berry Hill Mega Park and has spent approximately $13 million.
Pittsylvania County's administrator has been quoted as saying that installation of roads, utilities, erosion control, grading and making the site into a park will cost $222 million.
Everyone is hopeful that this park will be developed, resulting in long-term employment and economic opportunity.
Danville-Pittsylvania Regional Industrial Facilities Authority member and county supervisor Coy Harville was quoted as saying RIFA has no intention of mining uranium at the Berry Hill mega park site.
Mega park parcels purchased by the authority have historic Marline uranium leases. The authority now owns the mineral rights to the mega park.
If no uranium mining and milling are planned for the mega park, why not pass a resolution declaring that to be the case?
Karen B. Maute
Danville, VA
http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2010/01/14/chatham/opinion/opinion05.txt
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
SC Johnson HQ Testing Wind Energy
Posted By Environmental Leader On
January 13, 2010 @ 8:07 am
SC Johnson has started a pilot wind energy program at its headquarters in Racine, Wis.
With three wind turbines, the company says it aims to show that renewable energy can work at office buildings in urban settings. The turbines will set atop one of seven buildings at the SC Johnson campus.
The use of renewable energy is essential to”conducting business in a responsible way,” said Chairman and CEO Fisk Johnson, in a press release [1].
The turbines should be functional by the end of January, reports AZOCleantech [2].
While the turbines will generate just a small portion of electricity required by the campus, SC Johnson sees the pilot as a means of proving whether similar installations can be made at its other worldwide offices, Johnson said.
“We expect to have clear, consistent results within a year,” said Johnson.
Article printed from Environmental Leader: http://www.environmentalleader.com/
URL to article: http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/sc-johnson-hq-testing-wind-energy/
Read more:
http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/13/sc-johnson-hq-testing-wind-energy/print/
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
In uranium mining issue, it's Beach vs. the state
Flooding at Coles Hill, Dry Branch, Area of Proposed Tailing Ponds
By Deirdre Fernandes
The Virginian-Pilot
January 12, 2010
VIRGINIA BEACH
The state is considering lifting its 28-year ban on uranium mining, a move that has so alarmed Virginia Beach officials that they are spending $437,000 to study the worst-case scenario for the city’s water supply .
Virginia Beach has hired engineering firm Michael Baker Corp. to look into what could happen to Lake Gaston if there were a catastrophic accident at a possible uranium mining site upstream in south-central Virginia.
The state has tapped the National Academy of Sciences to provide information about best practices, risks and the potential for uranium mining in Virginia.
But that study won’t be comprehensive enough and state legislators dismissed concerns raised by Beach officials about the scope of the academy’s work, said Thomas Leahy, the city’s public utilities director.
“If the other side had volunteered to look at this issue, we wouldn’t have to do this study,” Leahy said.
Still, the cost of the Baker study surprised some Beach City Council members.
Councilwoman Barbara Henley said, “I know that studies have a tendency to cost a lot of money, but we have a major investment in Lake Gaston.”
The academy is still completing its contract and the research will take about 18 months to complete, said Jennifer Walsh, a spokeswoman for the organization.
Virginia Uranium Inc., the company interested in mining for ore in Pittsylvania County, is paying the $1.4 million cost of the study because of the state’s budget crisis.
Beach officials said they don’t question the academy’s credentials. They hope to share the results of their work with the academy, Leahy said.
The scope of the city’s study includes disaster modeling and a review by a panel of experts. Based on the results, more research may be needed and Virginia Beach may look to the state and neighboring cities to help defray the costs, Leahy said.
Water from Lake Gaston replenishes Norfolk’s reservoirs and Chesapeake is entitled to use a portion of the water.
For now, city officials need to know how concerned they should be about radioactive material getting into the water supply from a mining operation, Leahy said.
Read more:
Over 43,000 Citizens Demand Stronger EPA Action on the Chesapeake Bay
For Immediate Release:
2010-01-11
For More Information:
Brad Heavner, 410) 467-0439
John Rumpler, (617) 747-4306
Maryland
In what could well be the largest outpouring of public comments on the Chesapeake Bay, Environment Maryland reported that 43,140 bay area residents wrote to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency demanding they take stronger action to protect the bay.
"The message from the public is deafening and crystal clear: the EPA should be using every tool available to rein in bay polluters—including tough penalties if states fail to do their part," said Tommy Landers, Environment Maryland Clean Water Advocate.
Landers and other environmental advocates are concerned that the EPA appears to be backing away from some tough measures it had previously proposed. Pursuant to President Obama's executive order on the bay from May 2009, the EPA had issued a draft report in September 2009. However, subsequent documents from the agency omit or modify key proposals, including:
Regulating agricultural livestock operations and municipal stormwater systems. Agriculture and urban development represent the largest sources of pollution into the bay. In September the EPA proposed to expand and strengthen permits for these sources. In November they announced they would first wait to see state plans before acting.
Denial of new or expanded permits. One of the biggest sticks that the EPA carries is the ability to deny new pollution permits until adequate bay clean-up is underway. The EPA's September report included this as a possible "consequence" for state failure. But the agency's latest "consequences" announcement omits explicit reference to this threat.
"The EPA came out swinging, but now they're pulling their punches. As we and more than 40,000 people across the watershed have said, the EPA should immediately strengthen and expand permits for urban stormwater and farmland runoff. After 26 years of state action, it's clear that a wait-and-see approach will not work. The EPA should also use the strongest penalties at their disposal to push states to meet their goals." said Landers.
This outpouring of public support for a healthy bay is the latest, and largest, in a string of grassroots calls to action. Last summer, on a muggy August day, over four hundred bay residents packed a church cafeteria in Annapolis to express their frustrations directly to Chuck Fox, the EPA's new special adviser for the bay. In September, together with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and Environment Virginia, Environment Maryland presented the EPA with over 19,000 public comments calling for enforceable limits on all sources of pollution.
The 43,140 comments come from areas in the bay watershed throughout three states: 9,491 comments were from Maryland, 14,542 from Virginia, and 19,107 from Pennsylvania.
More info:
http://www.environmentamerica.org/news-releases/our-rivers-lakes-amp-streams/our-rivers-lakes-amp-streams/over-43000-citizens-demand-stronger-epa-action-on-the-chesapeake-bay
2010-01-11
For More Information:
Brad Heavner, 410) 467-0439
John Rumpler, (617) 747-4306
Maryland
In what could well be the largest outpouring of public comments on the Chesapeake Bay, Environment Maryland reported that 43,140 bay area residents wrote to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency demanding they take stronger action to protect the bay.
"The message from the public is deafening and crystal clear: the EPA should be using every tool available to rein in bay polluters—including tough penalties if states fail to do their part," said Tommy Landers, Environment Maryland Clean Water Advocate.
Landers and other environmental advocates are concerned that the EPA appears to be backing away from some tough measures it had previously proposed. Pursuant to President Obama's executive order on the bay from May 2009, the EPA had issued a draft report in September 2009. However, subsequent documents from the agency omit or modify key proposals, including:
Regulating agricultural livestock operations and municipal stormwater systems. Agriculture and urban development represent the largest sources of pollution into the bay. In September the EPA proposed to expand and strengthen permits for these sources. In November they announced they would first wait to see state plans before acting.
Denial of new or expanded permits. One of the biggest sticks that the EPA carries is the ability to deny new pollution permits until adequate bay clean-up is underway. The EPA's September report included this as a possible "consequence" for state failure. But the agency's latest "consequences" announcement omits explicit reference to this threat.
"The EPA came out swinging, but now they're pulling their punches. As we and more than 40,000 people across the watershed have said, the EPA should immediately strengthen and expand permits for urban stormwater and farmland runoff. After 26 years of state action, it's clear that a wait-and-see approach will not work. The EPA should also use the strongest penalties at their disposal to push states to meet their goals." said Landers.
This outpouring of public support for a healthy bay is the latest, and largest, in a string of grassroots calls to action. Last summer, on a muggy August day, over four hundred bay residents packed a church cafeteria in Annapolis to express their frustrations directly to Chuck Fox, the EPA's new special adviser for the bay. In September, together with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and Environment Virginia, Environment Maryland presented the EPA with over 19,000 public comments calling for enforceable limits on all sources of pollution.
The 43,140 comments come from areas in the bay watershed throughout three states: 9,491 comments were from Maryland, 14,542 from Virginia, and 19,107 from Pennsylvania.
More info:
http://www.environmentamerica.org/news-releases/our-rivers-lakes-amp-streams/our-rivers-lakes-amp-streams/over-43000-citizens-demand-stronger-epa-action-on-the-chesapeake-bay
Monday, January 11, 2010
Quebec moves closer to uranium exploration ban
NICOLAS DUPONT, Actualité – January 4, 2010
By makitagunarningit
Nine out of ten residents of Sept-Iles are opposed to uranium exploration in the area of the municipality.
Those are the results of an opinion poll commissioned by the City.
The City of Sept-Iles today disclosed the results of the survey conducted by Léger Marketing which asked town residents their views about uranium exploration and mining. The results show that all respondents were aware of the uranium exploration project at Lake Kachiwiss.
The rate of disapproval was 91 percent.
“Now that the results have been tabulated” said the Mayor of Sept-Iles, Serge Lévesque, “Minister [of Natural Resources] Simard has everything he needs to take a decision.
We have sent him these results. He has stated that there will be no project if the citizens of Sept-Iles do not want it. He now knows what the people want.”
Some other salient points: (1) more than half the people questioned consider themselves well-informed about the hazards of uranium; (2) support for a moratorium on all uranium exploration and mining projects throughout Quebec reached 87 percent, and (3) 98 percent of the people questioned consider that the government [of Quebec] should consult the municipality of Sept-Iles before taking any decision affecting uranium development
Read more:
http://makikuranium.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/quebec-moves-closer-to-uranium-exploration-ban/
Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S. - Act now to reduce risk
Release date: 01/08/2010
PHILADELPHIA (Jan. 7, 2010) Although testing for radon is easy and inexpensive, 80 percent of the homes in the U.S. have not been tested. Radon is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that EPA has reported as causing 20,000 lung cancer deaths nationwide every year.
Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer, after cigarette smoking. January is the best time to test for radon now that doors and windows are all tightly closed. Now is the time to test and if needed, reduce your exposure to radon. That’s why EPA designated January ‘radon action month.’
High radon levels have been found throughout EPA's mid-Atlantic region, which includes Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.
The only way to know if you and your family are at risk from radon is to test your home for radon or have it tested by a certified professional radon tester. For do-it-yourselfers, radon kits can be purchased for $25 at building supply, hardware and general merchandise stores. A basic test takes 10 minutes to set up and when complete is mailed to a lab for analysis.
If test results are above the EPA recommended action level you need to have the radon level reduced by a certified radon ‘mitigator.’ Reducing radon is not technically difficult and costs approximately $800 - $2,500.
To locate professional radon testers and certified radon ‘mitigators’ near you by look on the web at either the “National Environmental Health Association” or “National Radon Safety Board” sites. Be sure to ask to see their credentials.
Radon is a radioactive gas produced from the uranium which is in the geological formation under the soil. The amount or radon gas varies depending on the amount of uranium in the formation. The type of soil under the house, the design of the house and the life style or the family living in the house all affect the amount of radon gas that enters a home.
For more info on radon:
· EPA’s National Radon Hotline, 1-800-438-2474
· For lists of certified testers and mitigators use the web to search for the “National
· EPA’s radon website http://www.epa.gov/radon/radontest.html.Environmental Health Association” and/or “National Radon Safety Board”.
· EPA’s mid-Atlantic region, 1-800-438-2474
· The National Environmental Publications Center, 1-800-490-9198 or http://www.epa.gov/cinc. They have “Citizens Guide to Radon” and “Home Buyers and Sellers Guide”
Editor’s Note: See EPA’s website for free, publically-available graphics about radon and public Service announcements for print, television, and radio at http://www.epa.gov/radon
Read more:
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/124fe7baacbc7bd6852576a5004e42b0?OpenDocument
Saturday, January 9, 2010
MILLING OF THE ORE and URANIUM MILL TAILINGS DEPOSITS
Rio Algom Quirke Tailings (water covered): Aerial view Aug. 1999 - BHP Billton)
Ore mined in open pit or underground mines is crushed and leached in a uranium mill.
A uranium mill is a chemical plant designed to extract uranium from ore.
It is usually located near the mines to limit transportation. In the most cases, sulfuric acid is used as the leaching agent, but alkaline leaching is also used. As the leaching agent not only extracts uranium from the ore, but also several other constituents like molybdenum, vanadium, selenium, iron, lead and arsenic, the uranium must be separated out of the leaching solution. The final product produced from the mill, commonly referred to as "yellow cake" (U3O8 with impurities).
When closing down a uranium mill, large amounts of radioactively contaminated scrap are produced, which have to be disposed in a safe manner.
URANIUM MILL TAILINGS DEPOSITS
Characteristics of uranium mill tailings
Uranium mill tailings are normally dumped as a sludge in special ponds or piles.
The largest such piles in the US and Canada contain up to 30 million tonnes of solid material. In Saxony, Germany the Helmsdorf pile near Zwickau contains 50 million tonnes, and in Thuringia the Culmitzsch pile near Seelingstädt 86 million tonnes of solids.
The amount of sludge produced is nearly the same as that of the ore milled. At a grade of 0.1% uranium, 99.9% of the material is left over.
Apart from the portion of the uranium removed, the sludge contains all the constituents of the ore. As long lived decay products such as thorium-230 and radium-226 are not removed, the sludge contains 85% of the initial radioactivity of the ore. Due to technical limitations, all of the uranium present in the ore can not be extracted. Therefore, the sludge also contains 5% to 10% of the uranium initially present in the ore.
In addition, the sludge contains heavy metals and other contaminants such as arsenic, as well as chemical reagents used during the milling process.
Mining and milling removes hazardous constituents in the ore from their relatively safe underground location and converts them to a fine sand, then sludge, whereby the hazardous materials become more susceptible to dispersion in the environment.
Moreover, the constituents inside the tailings pile are in a geochemical disequilibrium that results in various reactions causing additional hazards to the environment. For example, in dry areas, salts containing contaminants can migrate to the surface of the pile, where they are subject to erosion. If the ore contains the mineral pyrite (FeS2), then sulfuric acid forms inside the deposit when accessed by precipitation and oxygen. This acid causes a continuous automatic leaching of contaminants.
Radon-222 gas emanates from tailings piles and has a half life of 3.8 days. This may seem short, but due to the continuous production of radon from the decay of radium-226, which has a half life of 1600 years, radon presents a longterm hazard. Further, because the parent product of radium-226, thorium-230 (with a half life of 80,000 years) is also present, there is continuous production of radium-226. (view Uranium decay series)
After about 1 million years, the radioactivity of the tailings and thus its radon emanation will have decreased so that it is only limited by the residual uranium contents, which continuously produces new thorium-230.
If, for example, 90% of the uranium contained in an ore with 0.1% grade was extracted during the milling process, the radiation of the tailings stabilizes after 1 million years at a level 33 times that of uncontaminated material. Due to the 4.5 billion year half-life of uranium-238, there is only a minuscule further decrease.
Read more:
http://www.wise-uranium.org/uwai.html#MILL
Friday, January 8, 2010
Area activists ready energy efficiency mailings
By Sean Tubbs Charlottesville Tomorrow stubbs@cvilletomorrow.org
Published: January 8, 2010
In the coming days, residents in Charlottesville and Albemarle County will receive a how-to-guide that lists steps to increase the energy efficiency of their homes.
The Piedmont Environ-mental Council will mail more than 70,000 copies of its new “EnergySmart-Solutions” booklet in the hopes of reducing the demand for energy.
“The cheapest energy is the energy you don’t have to buy in the first place because you don’t use it,” said U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Ivy, at a news conference held Thursday to launch the guide.
The effort is patterned after the PEC’s “Buy Fresh, Buy Local” campaign, which was intended to boost consumer awareness of local agriculture.
The new campaign recommends 10 steps that property owners can take to lower energy bills, ranging from installing compact fluorescent light bulbs to making sure attics are properly insulated. Other steps include insulating hot water heaters, plugging electronics into power-strips and routinely changing air filters.
“The objective is to provide local residents with the full information they need all in one place to be able to help them save energy and save money on their energy bills,” said Scott Elliff. Elliff is a resident of Forest Lakes in Albemarle County who took the idea to the PEC last year.
The result is a Web site (http://www.pecva.org/anx/index.cfm/0,598,html) with video instructions of how to perform each of the 10 steps, starring local builder Doug Lowe of Artisan Construction. Elliff said all of the recommended steps would cost under $500, but would save the average home $375 a year in energy costs.
Site visitors who fill out a survey are eligible to receive a 10 percent discount on supplies at participating home improvement stores. Perriello said he anticipates a boost in the local economy as homeowners head to hardware stores for supplies.
Christopher Miller, president of the PEC, said he recently switched to compact fluorescent bulbs and reduced his electricity consumption by 40 percent.
“If 10 percent of the 70,000 people do it, it’s going to make a significant difference in the net energy use in the state of Virginia,” Miller said. The eventual goal is to deliver the guide to every household in Virginia.
The program is not the only local initiative designed to help homeowners make their structures more energy efficient. The city and county recently received a $500,000 grant from the Southeastern Energy Alliance to create the Local Energy Alliance Program to help homeowners finance major projects.
Cynthia Adams, the city’s climate protection programs coordinator, is leading the LEAP program as it transitions from concept to reality. She said the two programs fit together well, but LEAP is designed for much more ambitious projects.
“A person would go to LEAP if they had cold and draughty rooms,” Adams said. “Seventy [percent] to 80 percent of homes all have an issue with air swelling.”
LEAP will help homeowners pay for major retrofits through a combination of federal tax incentives and low-cost financing. Participants will also be connected with contractors who are certified to do the work. For instance, if all of a home’s air holes are sealed, caution must be taken to make sure dangerous gases such as carbon monoxide can be ventilated
The program is working with several dozen homeowners on a test basis but will officially launch later this year.
According to one local energy auditor, there is a place for both LEAP and the PEC’s EnergySmart-Solutions guide.
“There are more draughts just coming through your walls, coming through electrical penetrations, and that’s something everyone can do with caulk and form,” said Andrew Grigsby of Culpeper-based Commonwealth Sustain-ability Works. He added that only one in 40 of the homes he audits has an adequate amount of insulation in the attic.
“It’s cheap, it’s easy and every house needs it,” Grigsby said. “Most people think their houses function normally, and they don’t. That’s what I see.”
Read more:
http://www2.dailyprogress.com/cdp/news/local/article/area_activists_ready_energy_efficiency_mailings/50741/
Published: January 8, 2010
In the coming days, residents in Charlottesville and Albemarle County will receive a how-to-guide that lists steps to increase the energy efficiency of their homes.
The Piedmont Environ-mental Council will mail more than 70,000 copies of its new “EnergySmart-Solutions” booklet in the hopes of reducing the demand for energy.
“The cheapest energy is the energy you don’t have to buy in the first place because you don’t use it,” said U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Ivy, at a news conference held Thursday to launch the guide.
The effort is patterned after the PEC’s “Buy Fresh, Buy Local” campaign, which was intended to boost consumer awareness of local agriculture.
The new campaign recommends 10 steps that property owners can take to lower energy bills, ranging from installing compact fluorescent light bulbs to making sure attics are properly insulated. Other steps include insulating hot water heaters, plugging electronics into power-strips and routinely changing air filters.
“The objective is to provide local residents with the full information they need all in one place to be able to help them save energy and save money on their energy bills,” said Scott Elliff. Elliff is a resident of Forest Lakes in Albemarle County who took the idea to the PEC last year.
The result is a Web site (http://www.pecva.org/anx/index.cfm/0,598,html) with video instructions of how to perform each of the 10 steps, starring local builder Doug Lowe of Artisan Construction. Elliff said all of the recommended steps would cost under $500, but would save the average home $375 a year in energy costs.
Site visitors who fill out a survey are eligible to receive a 10 percent discount on supplies at participating home improvement stores. Perriello said he anticipates a boost in the local economy as homeowners head to hardware stores for supplies.
Christopher Miller, president of the PEC, said he recently switched to compact fluorescent bulbs and reduced his electricity consumption by 40 percent.
“If 10 percent of the 70,000 people do it, it’s going to make a significant difference in the net energy use in the state of Virginia,” Miller said. The eventual goal is to deliver the guide to every household in Virginia.
The program is not the only local initiative designed to help homeowners make their structures more energy efficient. The city and county recently received a $500,000 grant from the Southeastern Energy Alliance to create the Local Energy Alliance Program to help homeowners finance major projects.
Cynthia Adams, the city’s climate protection programs coordinator, is leading the LEAP program as it transitions from concept to reality. She said the two programs fit together well, but LEAP is designed for much more ambitious projects.
“A person would go to LEAP if they had cold and draughty rooms,” Adams said. “Seventy [percent] to 80 percent of homes all have an issue with air swelling.”
LEAP will help homeowners pay for major retrofits through a combination of federal tax incentives and low-cost financing. Participants will also be connected with contractors who are certified to do the work. For instance, if all of a home’s air holes are sealed, caution must be taken to make sure dangerous gases such as carbon monoxide can be ventilated
The program is working with several dozen homeowners on a test basis but will officially launch later this year.
According to one local energy auditor, there is a place for both LEAP and the PEC’s EnergySmart-Solutions guide.
“There are more draughts just coming through your walls, coming through electrical penetrations, and that’s something everyone can do with caulk and form,” said Andrew Grigsby of Culpeper-based Commonwealth Sustain-ability Works. He added that only one in 40 of the homes he audits has an adequate amount of insulation in the attic.
“It’s cheap, it’s easy and every house needs it,” Grigsby said. “Most people think their houses function normally, and they don’t. That’s what I see.”
Read more:
http://www2.dailyprogress.com/cdp/news/local/article/area_activists_ready_energy_efficiency_mailings/50741/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















